• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸腔镜辅助肺癌肺叶切除术:学习曲线。

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy for lung cancer: the learning curve.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, People's Hospital, Peking University, No. 11, Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100044, China.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2010 Oct;34(10):2368-72. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0661-7.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-010-0661-7
PMID:20567972
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy is an acceptable alternative to open lobectomy for treating early-stage lung cancer. As with any video-assisted surgical procedure, there is a learning curve to overcome before becoming proficient. In this study, the outcomes of 90 consecutive VATS lobectomies for lung cancer were evaluated to determine the learning curve for this procedure.

METHODS

A single group of surgeons performed VATS lobectomy with systematic lymph node dissection in 90 patients with lung cancer between September 2006 and January 2009. The patients were divided equally and chronologically into three groups: group A, group B, and group C; group A was the earliest group of patients treated. Clinical data were collected. The operative time, blood loss, number of dissected mediastinal lymph nodes and nodal stations, conversion rate to thoracotomy, postoperative complications, duration of chest drainage, and hospital stay duration were compared between the three groups.

RESULTS

There were no differences between the three groups with respect to age, gender, size of tumor, pathological stage, and operative procedure. The operative time and blood loss were significantly lower in groups B and C than in group A (P < 0.01); however, there were no differences between groups B and C. There were no differences among the groups in the number lymph nodes harvested, conversion rate, postoperative complications, duration of chest drainage, or hospital stay duration.

CONCLUSIONS

A learning curve for VATS lobectomy existed in this series. The surgeon became more proficient after 30-60 cases and was able to perform the procedure with decreased blood loss and operative time.

摘要

背景

胸腔镜辅助手术(VATS)肺叶切除术是治疗早期肺癌的一种可接受的开放式肺叶切除术替代方法。与任何视频辅助手术一样,在熟练掌握之前需要克服学习曲线。在这项研究中,评估了 90 例连续 VATS 肺叶切除术治疗肺癌的结果,以确定该手术的学习曲线。

方法

一组外科医生于 2006 年 9 月至 2009 年 1 月期间对 90 例肺癌患者进行了 VATS 肺叶切除术和系统纵隔淋巴结清扫术。患者分为三组:A 组、B 组和 C 组;A 组是最早接受治疗的一组患者。收集临床资料。比较三组患者的手术时间、出血量、解剖纵隔淋巴结数量和淋巴结站数、中转开胸率、术后并发症、胸腔引流时间和住院时间。

结果

三组患者的年龄、性别、肿瘤大小、病理分期和手术方式无差异。B 组和 C 组的手术时间和出血量明显低于 A 组(P < 0.01);但 B 组和 C 组之间无差异。三组患者淋巴结清扫数量、中转率、术后并发症、胸腔引流时间、住院时间无差异。

结论

在本系列中存在 VATS 肺叶切除术的学习曲线。外科医生在完成 30-60 例手术后变得更加熟练,能够减少出血和手术时间。

相似文献

1
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy for lung cancer: the learning curve.胸腔镜辅助肺癌肺叶切除术:学习曲线。
World J Surg. 2010 Oct;34(10):2368-72. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0661-7.
2
Complete mediastinal lymph node dissection in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy versus lobectomy by thoracotomy.电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术与开胸肺叶切除术中完全纵隔淋巴结清扫术的比较
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Mar;61(2):116-23. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1299589. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
3
Credentialing for robotic lobectomy: what is the learning curve? A retrospective analysis of 272 consecutive cases by a single surgeon.机器人肺叶切除术的认证:学习曲线是什么?单外科医生对 272 例连续病例的回顾性分析。
J Robot Surg. 2019 Oct;13(5):663-669. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-00902-1. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
4
Switching from Thoracoscopic to Robotic Platform for Lobectomy: Report of Learning Curve and Outcome.从胸腔镜到机器人平台行肺叶切除术的转换:学习曲线和结果报告。
Innovations (Phila). 2020 May/Jun;15(3):235-242. doi: 10.1177/1556984520911670. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
5
Learning curve in robotic-assisted lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer is not steep after experience in video-assisted lobectomy; single-surgeon experience using cumulative sum analysis.机器人辅助肺叶切除术治疗非小细胞肺癌的学习曲线在有了电视辅助肺叶切除术经验后并不陡峭;采用累积和分析的单外科医生经验。
Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2021;27:100362. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100362. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
6
Transitioning from video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy to robotics for lung cancer: are there outcomes advantages?从电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术到机器人手术治疗肺癌:是否有结果优势?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Feb;147(2):724-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Nov 16.
7
Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: an alternative to conventional thoracoscopic lobectomy in lung cancer surgery?单孔电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术:肺癌手术中传统胸腔镜肺叶切除术的替代方法?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Jun;20(6):813-9. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv034. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
8
Systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection outcomes and conversion rates of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer.系统性纵隔淋巴结清扫术治疗肺癌的单孔电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术的疗效及中转率
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Sep;89(9):1056-1060. doi: 10.1111/ans.15338. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
9
Video-assisted vs open mediastinal lymphadenectomy for Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a prospective randomized trial.电视辅助与开放性纵隔淋巴结廓清术治疗Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌:前瞻性随机试验结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Aug;44(2):244-9; discussion 249. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs668. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
10
[To Explore Clinical Value of Single-port Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery 
in Elderly Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Lobectomy, Segmentectomy 
and Lobectomy vs Segmentectomy].[探讨单孔电视胸腔镜手术在老年非小细胞肺癌患者中的临床价值:肺叶切除术、肺段切除术及肺叶切除术与肺段切除术的比较]
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2018 Apr 20;21(4):287-295. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2018.04.11.

引用本文的文献

1
Resectable non-stage IV nonsmall cell lung cancer: the surgical perspective.可切除的非 IV 期非小细胞肺癌:外科视角。
Eur Respir Rev. 2024 Mar 20;33(171). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0195-2023. Print 2024 Jan 31.
2
Hospital learning curves for robot-assisted surgeries: a population-based analysis.机器人辅助手术的医院学习曲线:基于人群的分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Mar;38(3):1367-1378. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10625-6. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
3
Short-term outcomes of robotic lobectomy versus video-assisted lobectomy in patients with pulmonary neoplasms.

本文引用的文献

1
Complications and learning curves for video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy.电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术的并发症及学习曲线
Thorac Surg Clin. 2008 Aug;18(3):275-80. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2008.04.004.
2
Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: centers of excellence or excellence of centers?电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术:卓越中心还是中心卓越?
Thorac Surg Clin. 2008 Aug;18(3):263-8. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2008.04.001.
3
Learning curve in videothoracoscopic thymectomy: how many operations and in which situations?电视胸腔镜胸腺切除术的学习曲线:需要进行多少例手术以及在哪些情况下进行?
机器人肺叶切除术与电视辅助肺叶切除术治疗肺部肿瘤患者的短期疗效比较。
Thorac Cancer. 2023 Jun;14(16):1512-1519. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14895. Epub 2023 May 1.
4
Is faster better? Impact of operative time on postoperative outcomes after VATS anatomical pulmonary resection.速度更快就更好吗?电视辅助胸腔镜解剖性肺切除术后手术时间对术后结局的影响。
J Thorac Dis. 2022 Jun;14(6):1980-1989. doi: 10.21037/jtd-21-1774.
5
Comparison of two preoperative positioning techniques and unpositioning methods in non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.非插管电视辅助胸腔镜手术中两种术前定位技术与非定位方法的比较
J Thorac Dis. 2022 Feb;14(2):464-473. doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-114.
6
Evaluation of Short-Term Outcomes and the Learning Curve Wherein a Thoracic Resident Doctor Performed Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Anatomical Lung Resection for Lung Cancer.评估一名胸科住院医师行电视辅助胸腔镜解剖性肺切除术治疗肺癌的短期疗效和学习曲线。
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Aug 20;28(4):249-254. doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.21-00216. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
7
Perioperative Outcome of Robotic Approach Manual Videothoracoscopic Major Resection in Patients Affected by Early Lung Cancer: Results of a Randomized Multicentric Study (ROMAN Study).早期肺癌患者机器人辅助与手动电视胸腔镜肺叶切除术围手术期结果:一项随机多中心研究(ROMAN研究)的结果
Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 9;11:726408. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.726408. eCollection 2021.
8
Thoracoscopy: The past, the present and the future! A personal journey.胸腔镜检查:过去、现在与未来!一段个人历程。
Afr J Thorac Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr 3;24(1). doi: 10.7196/AJTCCM.2018.v24i1.182. eCollection 2018.
9
Impact of da Vinci Xi robot in pulmonary resection.达芬奇Xi机器人在肺切除术中的影响。
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Jul;12(7):3561-3572. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-720.
10
Novice training: The time course for developing competence in single port video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.新手培训:单孔电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术技能培养的时间进程
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Mar;99(12):e19459. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019459.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Jul;34(1):155-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.12.056. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
4
Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: report of CALGB 39802--a prospective, multi-institution feasibility study.电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术:CALGB 39802报告——一项前瞻性、多机构可行性研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Nov 1;25(31):4993-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.6649.
5
Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer stage I and stage II: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition).非小细胞肺癌I期和II期的治疗:美国胸科医师学会循证临床实践指南(第2版)
Chest. 2007 Sep;132(3 Suppl):234S-242S. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1378.
6
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is more favorable than thoracotomy for resection of clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer.对于临床I期非小细胞肺癌的切除,电视辅助胸腔镜手术比开胸手术更具优势。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Jun;83(6):1965-70. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.01.049.
7
Thoracoscopic lobectomy is a safe and versatile procedure: experience with 500 consecutive patients.电视胸腔镜肺叶切除术是一种安全且用途广泛的手术:500例连续患者的经验。
Ann Surg. 2006 Sep;244(3):420-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000234892.79056.63.
8
Systematic node dissection by VATS is not inferior to that through an open thoracotomy: a comparative clinicopathologic retrospective study.电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)系统性淋巴结清扫术并不逊色于开胸手术:一项比较临床病理回顾性研究。
Surgery. 2005 Sep;138(3):510-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.04.005.
9
Assessment of node dissection for clinical stage I primary lung cancer by VATS.电视辅助胸腔镜手术对临床I期原发性肺癌的淋巴结清扫评估
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 May;27(5):745-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.02.007.
10
A cumulative analysis of an individual surgeon's early experience with elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.对一名外科医生择期开放性腹主动脉瘤修复早期经验的累积分析。
Am J Surg. 2005 Apr;189(4):469-73. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.06.044.