• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

陷阱类型、诱捕器放置位置和生境对美国东北部 Cerambycidae 和 Scolytinae(鞘翅目)捕获量的影响。

Trap type, lure placement, and habitat effects on Cerambycidae and Scolytinae (Coleoptera) catches in the Northeastern United States.

机构信息

USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry, 271 Mast Rd., Durham, NH 03824, USA.

出版信息

J Econ Entomol. 2010 Jun;103(3):698-707. doi: 10.1603/ec09395.

DOI:10.1603/ec09395
PMID:20568615
Abstract

Semiochemical-based exotic species surveys targeting forest Coleoptera have gradually expanded in North America and elsewhere. Determining how various factors affect trap catches and increase species richness in traps is important for maximizing the efficacy of survey efforts. Studies were conducted in southern Maine and New Hampshire by using ethanol and alpha-pinene as lures to determine the influence of trap type, lure placement and size, and habitat type on catches of Scolytinae and Cerambycidae in coniferous forests. Three trap types (canopy malaise, intercept panel, and multiple-funnel), three lure placements/sizes (standard placement, above trap, and enlarged), and two habitat types (margins of clearcuts and shelterwood) were tested in three experiments. The three trap types performed equally well in terms of average number of species captured, but the canopy malaise caught more unique species than the other traps. In most cases, traps with lures placed above traps caught fewer beetles than lures hanging from the side of traps or with an expanded surface area. Generally, more insects were captured in shelterwood treatments versus the margins of clearcuts.

摘要

基于半化学物质的外来物种调查已逐渐在北美和其他地区扩展,针对森林鞘翅目昆虫。确定各种因素如何影响陷阱捕获率并增加陷阱中的物种丰富度对于最大限度地提高调查效果非常重要。本研究在缅因州南部和新罕布什尔州进行,使用乙醇和α-蒎烯作为引诱剂,以确定陷阱类型、引诱物放置和大小以及生境类型对针叶林内小蠹科和天牛科昆虫捕获率的影响。在三个实验中测试了三种陷阱类型(树冠粘虫陷阱、拦截面板和多个漏斗)、三种引诱物放置/大小(标准放置、高于陷阱和扩大)和两种生境类型(皆伐林缘和疏林)。就捕获的平均物种数量而言,这三种陷阱类型的性能相当,但树冠粘虫陷阱比其他陷阱捕获了更多独特的物种。在大多数情况下,放置在高于陷阱的诱剂的陷阱捕获的甲虫比悬挂在陷阱侧面或具有更大表面积的诱剂的陷阱少。一般来说,在疏林处理中捕获的昆虫比皆伐林缘多。

相似文献

1
Trap type, lure placement, and habitat effects on Cerambycidae and Scolytinae (Coleoptera) catches in the Northeastern United States.陷阱类型、诱捕器放置位置和生境对美国东北部 Cerambycidae 和 Scolytinae(鞘翅目)捕获量的影响。
J Econ Entomol. 2010 Jun;103(3):698-707. doi: 10.1603/ec09395.
2
Effects of habitat type and trap placement on captures of bark (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and longhorned (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) beetles in semiochemical-baited traps.生境类型和诱捕器放置位置对引诱剂诱捕的树皮甲虫(鞘翅目:小蠹科)和长角甲虫(鞘翅目:天牛科)的捕获效果的影响。
J Econ Entomol. 2011 Jun;104(3):879-88. doi: 10.1603/ec10358.
3
Attaching lures to multiple-funnel traps targeting saproxylic beetles (Coleoptera) in pine stands: inside or outside funnels?在松树林中针对木质甲虫(鞘翅目)使用多漏斗诱捕器时,将诱饵附在诱捕器上:在漏斗内还是漏斗外?
J Econ Entomol. 2013 Feb;106(1):206-14. doi: 10.1603/ec12254.
4
Relative performance of Lindgren multiple-funnel, Intercept panel, and Colossus pipe traps in catching Cerambycidae and associated species in the southeastern United States.林格伦多漏斗、拦截板和巨管陷阱在捕捉美国东南部的 Cerambycidae 及其相关物种方面的相对性能。
J Econ Entomol. 2011 Dec;104(6):1934-41. doi: 10.1603/ec11166.
5
Ipsenol, Ipsdienol, Ethanol, and α-Pinene: Trap Lure Blend for Cerambycidae and Buprestidae (Coleoptera) in Pine Forests of Eastern North America.异松油烯、异长叶烯、乙醇和α-蒎烯:北美东部松林里天牛科和吉丁甲科(鞘翅目)的诱捕诱饵混合物。
J Econ Entomol. 2015 Aug;108(4):1837-51. doi: 10.1093/jee/tov126. Epub 2015 May 21.
6
Trap Height Affects Catches of Bark and Woodboring Beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Cerambycidae) in Baited Multiple-Funnel Traps in Southeastern United States.诱捕器高度对美国东南部诱捕多漏斗诱捕器中树皮和蛀木甲虫(鞘翅目:象甲科,天牛科)的捕获量的影响。
J Econ Entomol. 2020 Feb 8;113(1):273-280. doi: 10.1093/jee/toz271.
7
Species composition, seasonal activity, and semiochemical response of native and exotic bark and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) in northeastern Ohio.美国俄亥俄州东北部本地和外来树皮和粉蠹甲虫(鞘翅目:象甲科:小蠹科)的物种组成、季节性活动和信息素反应。
J Econ Entomol. 2010 Aug;103(4):1187-95. doi: 10.1603/ec10026.
8
Effect of trap type, trap position, time of year, and beetle density on captures of the redbay ambrosia beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae).陷阱类型、陷阱位置、年份时间和甲虫密度对红树南美杉小蠹(鞘翅目:象甲科:小蠹科)捕获的影响。
J Econ Entomol. 2011 Apr;104(2):501-8. doi: 10.1603/EC10263.
9
Interactions between Ethanol, syn-2,3-Hexanediol, 3-Hydroxyhexan-2-one, and 3-Hydroxyoctan-2-one Lures on Trap Catches of Hardwood Longhorn Beetles in Southeastern United States.乙醇、顺式-2,3-己二醇、3-羟基己-2-酮和3-羟基辛-2-酮诱饵之间的相互作用对美国东南部硬木长角甲虫诱捕量的影响
J Econ Entomol. 2017 Oct 1;110(5):2119-2128. doi: 10.1093/jee/tox188.
10
Multiple-Lure Surveillance Trapping for Ips Bark Beetles, Monochamus Longhorn Beetles, and Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae).针对 Ips 小蠹虫、松墨天牛和梨木虱(半翅目:蝽科)的多诱饵监测诱捕
J Econ Entomol. 2018 Sep 26;111(5):2255-2263. doi: 10.1093/jee/toy190.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Three Attractants for the Effective Capture of Adults in Multi-Funnel Traps.三种引诱剂在多漏斗诱捕器中对成虫有效捕获效果的比较
Insects. 2023 Jul 31;14(8):676. doi: 10.3390/insects14080676.
2
Edge Effects in the Distribution of Coleoptera in the Forests of the Center of the European Part of Russia.俄罗斯欧洲部分中部森林中鞘翅目分布的边缘效应
Insects. 2023 Apr 10;14(4):371. doi: 10.3390/insects14040371.
3
The Effect of Trap Color on Catches of and Three Most Numerous Non-Target Insect Species.诱捕器颜色对[目标昆虫名称]及三种数量最多的非目标昆虫种类捕获量的影响
Insects. 2022 Feb 22;13(3):220. doi: 10.3390/insects13030220.
4
Effect of Cleaning Multiple-Funnel Traps on Captures of Bark and Woodboring Beetles in Northeastern United States.清洁多重漏斗诱捕器对美国东北部树皮甲虫和蛀木甲虫捕获量的影响。
Insects. 2020 Oct 14;11(10):702. doi: 10.3390/insects11100702.
5
The Impact of Environmental Factors on the Efficacy of Chemical Communication in the Burying Beetle (Coleoptera: Silphidae).环境因素对埋葬甲(鞘翅目:葬甲科)化学通讯效果的影响。
J Insect Sci. 2020 Jul 1;20(4). doi: 10.1093/jisesa/ieaa061.
6
A comparison of trapping techniques (Coleoptera: Carabidae, Buprestidae, Cerambycidae, and Curculionoidea excluding Scolytinae).诱捕技术的比较(鞘翅目:步甲科、吉丁甲科、天牛科和象甲总科,不包括小蠹亚科)。
J Insect Sci. 2017 Jan 27;17(1). doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iew098. Print 2017 Jan.