• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于影像的颈椎间盘假体植入术后 C5-6 节段非椎体关节及小关节的负荷分担分析: Bryan、Prestige LP 或 ProDisc-C 颈椎间盘假体的体内实验研究

Analysis of load sharing on uncovertebral and facet joints at the C5-6 level with implantation of the Bryan, Prestige LP, or ProDisc-C cervical disc prosthesis: an in vivo image-based finite element study.

机构信息

Spine Research Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.

出版信息

Neurosurg Focus. 2010 Jun;28(6):E9. doi: 10.3171/2010.3.FOCUS1046.

DOI:10.3171/2010.3.FOCUS1046
PMID:20568924
Abstract

OBJECT

The goal of this study was to evaluate and compare load sharing of the facet and uncovertebral joints after total cervical disc arthroplasty using 3 different implant designs.

METHODS

Three-dimensional voxel finite element models were built for the C5-6 spine unit based on CT images acquired from a candidate patient for cervical disc arthroplasty. Models of facet and uncovertebral joints were added and artificial discs were placed in the intervertebral disc space. Finite element analyses were conducted under normal physiological loads for flexion, extension, and lateral bending to evaluate von Mises stresses and strain energy density (SED) levels at the joints.

RESULTS

The Bryan disc imposed the greatest average stress and SED levels at facet and uncovertebral joints with flexion-extension and lateral bending, while the ProDisc-C and Prestige LP discs transferred less load due to their rigid cores. However, all artificial discs showed increased loads at the joints in lateral bending, which may be attributed to direct impinging contact force.

CONCLUSIONS

In unconstrained/semiconstrained prostheses with different core rigidity, the shared loads at the joints differ, and greater flexibility may result in greater joint loads. With respect to the 3 artificial discs studied, load sharing of the Bryan disc was highest and was closest to normal load sharing with the facet and uncovertebral joints. The Prestige LP and ProDisc-C carried more load through their rigid core, resulting in decreased load transmission to the facet and uncovertebral joints.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估和比较三种不同假体设计在全颈椎间盘置换术后对小关节突关节和钩椎关节的负荷分担。

方法

根据颈椎间盘置换术候选患者的 CT 图像,建立 C5-6 脊柱单元的三维体素有限元模型。添加小关节突关节和钩椎关节模型,并在椎间盘间隙放置人工椎间盘。在正常生理负荷下进行屈伸和侧屈的有限元分析,以评估关节处的 von Mises 应力和应变能密度(SED)水平。

结果

Bryan 椎间盘在屈伸和侧屈时对小关节突关节和钩椎关节施加的平均应力和 SED 水平最大,而 ProDisc-C 和 Prestige LP 椎间盘由于其刚性核心传递的负荷较小。然而,所有人工椎间盘在侧屈时关节处的负荷均增加,这可能归因于直接撞击接触力。

结论

在具有不同核心刚性的非约束/半约束假体中,关节的分担负荷不同,更大的灵活性可能导致更大的关节负荷。就所研究的三种人工椎间盘而言,Bryan 椎间盘的分担负荷最高,与小关节突关节和钩椎关节的正常负荷分担最为接近。Prestige LP 和 ProDisc-C 通过其刚性核心承载更多的负荷,导致向小关节突关节和钩椎关节的负荷传递减少。

相似文献

1
Analysis of load sharing on uncovertebral and facet joints at the C5-6 level with implantation of the Bryan, Prestige LP, or ProDisc-C cervical disc prosthesis: an in vivo image-based finite element study.基于影像的颈椎间盘假体植入术后 C5-6 节段非椎体关节及小关节的负荷分担分析: Bryan、Prestige LP 或 ProDisc-C 颈椎间盘假体的体内实验研究
Neurosurg Focus. 2010 Jun;28(6):E9. doi: 10.3171/2010.3.FOCUS1046.
2
Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.颈椎终板与Bryan、Prestige LP和ProDisc - C颈椎间盘假体之间界面的应力分析:一项基于体内图像的有限元研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jul 1;34(15):1554-60. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aa643b.
3
Relaxation of forces needed to distract cervical vertebrae after discectomy: a biomechanical study.椎间盘切除术后颈椎撑开所需力量的松弛:一项生物力学研究
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Apr;22(2):100-4. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318168d9c0.
4
Effect of arthroplasty design on cervical spine kinematics: analysis of the Bryan Disc, ProDisc-C, and Synergy disc.人工关节设计对颈椎运动学的影响:Bryan 椎间盘、ProDisc-C 和 Synergy 椎间盘的分析。
Neurosurg Focus. 2010 Jun;28(6):E6. doi: 10.3171/2010.3.FOCUS1058.
5
Effect of spacer diameter of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.Dynesys动态稳定系统间隔器直径对腰椎生物力学的影响:有限元分析
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012 Jul;25(5):E140-9. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31824e5e10.
6
Biomechanical comparison of noncontiguous cervical disc arthroplasty and noncontiguous cervical discectomy and fusion in the treatment of noncontinuous cervical degenerative disc disease: a finite element analysis.非连续颈椎间盘置换与非连续颈椎间盘切除融合术治疗非连续性颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病的生物力学比较:有限元分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Jan 31;15(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-1549-3.
7
Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.腰椎全椎间盘置换中约束的生物力学效应:一项有限元分析研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 May 20;34(12):1281-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a4ec2d.
8
Analysis of in vivo kinematics of 3 different cervical devices: Bryan disc, ProDisc-C, and Prestige LP disc.分析 3 种不同颈椎装置(Bryan 椎间盘、ProDisc-C 椎间盘和 Prestige LP 椎间盘)的体内运动学。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Dec;15(6):630-5. doi: 10.3171/2011.8.SPINE11273. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
9
Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.融合术和Bryan人工椎间盘置换术后的颈椎运动学
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Feb;21(1):19-22. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180500778.
10
Analysis of segmental cervical spine vertebral motion after prodisc-C cervical disc replacement.椎间盘置换术后颈椎节段运动分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Apr 15;35(8):E285-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c88165.

引用本文的文献

1
Facet joint loading after 1-, 2- and 3-level cervical disc arthroplasty: a comparison of spiked versus keeled baseplates.1、2和3节段颈椎间盘置换术后小关节负荷:带尖刺与带龙骨基板的比较
N Am Spine Soc J. 2024 Jun 27;19:100512. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100512. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
A comparative study of the effect of facet tropism on the index-level kinematics and biomechanics after artificial cervical disc replacement (ACDR) with Prestige LP, Prodisc-C vivo, and Mobi-C: a finite element study.颈椎间盘置换术后节段间运动学和生物力学的有限元研究: facet tropism 对 Prestige LP、Prodisc-C vivo 和 Mobi-C 人工颈椎间盘置换的影响比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Oct 30;19(1):705. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05218-5.
3
Prospective Multicenter Trial of Cervical Arthroplasty with the ROTAIO® Cervical Disc Prosthesis.
ROTAIO®颈椎间盘假体颈椎置换术的前瞻性多中心试验
Global Spine J. 2024 Mar;14(2):429-437. doi: 10.1177/21925682221109563. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
4
Investigation into Cervical Spine Biomechanics Following Single, Multilevel and Hybrid Disc Replacement Surgery with Dynamic Cervical Implant and Fusion: A Finite Element Study.使用动态颈椎植入物和融合技术进行单节段、多节段及混合式椎间盘置换术后颈椎生物力学的研究:一项有限元研究
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Jan 4;9(1):16. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9010016.
5
The CT assessment of uncovertebral joints degeneration in a healthy population.健康人群钩椎关节退变的CT评估
Eur J Med Res. 2021 Dec 13;26(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s40001-021-00619-2.
6
Long-term Follow-Up Results of Dynamic Cervical Implant in Patients with Cervical Disk Diseases: Compared with Arthroplasty.颈椎间盘疾病患者动态颈椎植入物的长期随访结果:与关节成形术相比。
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2023 Sep;84(5):455-461. doi: 10.1055/a-1712-5386. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
7
A graphical guide for constructing a finite element model of the cervical spine with digital orthopedic software.使用数字骨科软件构建颈椎有限元模型的图形指南。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jan;9(2):169. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-2451.
8
Effect of Facet Tropism on Postoperative Cervical Range of Motion After Single-Level Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.关节突关节不对称对单节段颈椎间盘置换术后颈椎活动度的影响。
Global Spine J. 2022 Oct;12(8):1696-1707. doi: 10.1177/2192568220986144. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
9
Unique biomechanical signatures of Bryan, Prodisc C, and Prestige LP cervical disc replacements: a finite element modelling study.Bryan、Prodisc C 和 Prestige LP 颈椎间盘置换假体的独特生物力学特征:一项有限元建模研究。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Nov;29(11):2631-2639. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06113-y. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
10
Durability of cervical disc arthroplasties and its influence factors: A systematic review and a network meta-analysis.颈椎间盘置换术的耐久性及其影响因素:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Feb;96(6):e5947. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005947.