Suppr超能文献

大剂量口服泼尼松与泼尼松联合硫唑嘌呤治疗口腔天疱疮:一项回顾性、双中心、对照研究。

High dose oral prednisone vs. prednisone plus azathioprine for the treatment of oral pemphigus: a retrospective, bi-centre, comparative study.

机构信息

State Hospital for Dermatologic and Venereologic Diseases, Thessaloniki A' Department of Dermatology, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece.

出版信息

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011 Feb;25(2):206-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03753.x. Epub 2010 Jun 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Steroids are considered the cornerstone in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris. However, subsequent morbidity of their use has led to the development of combined therapeutic protocols, using steroid sparing agents.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare tolerability and efficacy of high dose oral prednisone daily, vs. low dose oral prednisone on alternate days plus azathioprine every day (Lever's mini treatment: LMT) in oral pemphigus.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data of 36 patients with oral pemphigus vulgaris, treated with either 1.5 mg/kg/day of oral prednisone daily, or LMT were re-evaluated and statistically analysed. Primary endpoints were time required to control disease activity, prednisone dose required until the end of consolidation phase, cumulative prednisone dose and rates of remission. Secondary endpoints were time to complete (CR) or partial remission (PR) on/off therapy, treatment-associated morbidity and days of hospitalization.

RESULTS

Both treatments resulted in high rates of clinical response. The mean prednisone dose required until the end of consolidation phase, and until CR or PR, on/off minimal therapy, was significantly lower in LMT group. However, the mean time required until the control of disease activity and CR or PR, for the same group, was significantly higher. Adverse events were more frequent among patients under daily prednisone. Mean time of hospitalization was also longer in the latter group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both treatments seem efficacious. Rapidly progressive lesions necessitate high prednisone dose for early and adequate control of the disease. Patients with impaired physical status, especially those with relatively stable lesions, at baseline might safely and effectively be treated with LMT.

摘要

背景

类固醇被认为是治疗寻常型天疱疮的基石。然而,由于其使用后的后续发病率,已经开发出联合治疗方案,使用类固醇保留剂。

目的

本研究旨在比较大剂量口服泼尼松每日治疗与小剂量泼尼松隔日口服联合每天硫唑嘌呤(Lever 的迷你治疗:LMT)治疗口腔天疱疮的耐受性和疗效。

患者和方法

回顾性分析了 36 例口腔寻常型天疱疮患者的数据,他们分别接受 1.5mg/kg/天的泼尼松每日治疗或 LMT 治疗。主要终点是控制疾病活动所需的时间、巩固阶段结束时所需的泼尼松剂量、累积泼尼松剂量和缓解率。次要终点是完成(CR)或部分缓解(PR)的时间/停药、治疗相关的发病率和住院天数。

结果

两种治疗方法均导致高临床缓解率。LMT 组在巩固阶段结束时和达到 CR 或 PR 时所需的平均泼尼松剂量明显较低。然而,该组达到控制疾病活动和 CR 或 PR 的平均时间明显较长。在每日接受泼尼松治疗的患者中,不良反应更为频繁。后者组的平均住院时间也更长。

结论

两种治疗方法似乎都有效。快速进展的病变需要高剂量的泼尼松以早期和充分控制疾病。对于基础疾病状态较差的患者,特别是病变相对稳定的患者,可以安全有效地采用 LMT 治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验