Suppr超能文献

结肠镜检查中息肉的检测、切除和活检的专业差异。

Specialty differences in polyp detection, removal, and biopsy during colonoscopy.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med. 2010 Jun;123(6):528-35. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.01.016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colonoscopy is a technically complex procedure commonly performed to detect and remove colorectal pathology. This study examined the influence of provider characteristics on polyp detection, polyp removal, and diagnostic biopsy rates.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study using a 20% sample of 2003 Medicare claims. Primary outcome measures were use of diagnostic biopsy, polyp detection, and polyp removal. We used generalized estimating equations to identify independent predictors of the outcomes, adjusting for patient and provider characteristics.

RESULTS

Among 328,167 outpatient colonoscopies, polyp detection and removal rates were significantly lower for nongastroenterologists than gastroenterologists, with adjusted relative risk for polyp detection between 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-0.83) for general surgeons and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.89-0.98) for internists. Compared with gastroenterologists, diagnostic biopsy was significantly less likely for general (relative risk [RR] 0.69; 95% CI, 0.65-0.74) or colorectal surgeons (RR 0.58; 95% CI, 0.52-0.65). The likelihood of polyp detection and removal was higher for physicians in the middle 2 quartiles of annual colonoscopy volume, but similar for physicians in the highest and lowest volume quartiles. Polyp detection and removal were significantly less likely for examinations in ambulatory surgery centers or offices than hospital outpatient settings, while diagnostic biopsy was significantly less likely in office settings.

CONCLUSIONS

Physician specialty, annual colonoscopy volume, and site of service are significant predictors of polyp detection, polyp removal, and diagnostic biopsy. These findings may have important implications for the effectiveness of colonoscopy.

摘要

背景

结肠镜检查是一项技术复杂的程序,常用于检测和切除结直肠病变。本研究探讨了提供者特征对息肉检出率、息肉切除率和诊断性活检率的影响。

方法

我们使用 2003 年医疗保险索赔的 20%样本进行回顾性横断面研究。主要结局指标是使用诊断性活检、息肉检出和息肉切除。我们使用广义估计方程来识别这些结果的独立预测因素,并调整患者和提供者特征。

结果

在 328167 例门诊结肠镜检查中,非胃肠病学家的息肉检出率和切除率明显低于胃肠病学家,普外科医生的相对风险为 0.80(95%可信区间[CI],0.77-0.83),内科医生为 0.93(95% CI,0.89-0.98)。与胃肠病学家相比,普外科医生(相对风险[RR] 0.69;95% CI,0.65-0.74)或结直肠外科医生(RR 0.58;95% CI,0.52-0.65)进行诊断性活检的可能性明显降低。在年度结肠镜检查量处于中间 2 个四分位数的医生中,息肉检出和切除的可能性更高,但在最高和最低容量四分位数的医生中则相似。在门诊手术中心或办公室进行的检查中,息肉检出和切除的可能性明显低于医院门诊环境,而在办公室环境中,进行诊断性活检的可能性明显降低。

结论

医生的专业、年度结肠镜检查量和服务地点是息肉检出、息肉切除和诊断性活检的重要预测因素。这些发现可能对结肠镜检查的效果有重要影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验