Center for the Study of Complementary and Alternative Therapies, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0782, USA.
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2010 Sep;34(3):500-28. doi: 10.1007/s11013-010-9186-7.
This cultural case study investigates one U.S. psychosocial rehabilitation organization's (Horizons) attempt to implement the recovery philosophy of the U.S. Recovery Movement and offers lessons from this local attempt that may inform global mental health care reform. Horizons' "recovery-oriented" initiatives unwittingly mobilized stressful North American discourses of valued citizenship. At times, efforts to "empower" people diagnosed with schizophrenia to become esteemed self-made citizens generated more stressful sociocultural conditions for people whose daily lives were typically remarkably stressful. A recovery-oriented mental health system must account for people diagnosed with schizophrenia's sensitivity to stress and offer consumers contextually relevant coping mechanisms. Any attempt to export U.S. mental health care practices to the rest of the world must acknowledge that (1) sociocultural conditions affect schizophrenia outcomes; (2) schizophrenia outcomes are already better in the developing world than in the United States; and (3) much of what leads to "better" outcomes in the developing world may rely on the availability of locally relevant techniques to address stress.
本文化案例研究调查了美国一家心理康复组织(Horizons)试图实施美国康复运动的康复理念,并从这一本土化尝试中汲取经验,以期为全球精神卫生保健改革提供参考。Horizons 的“以康复为导向”的举措无意间调动了北美有价值的公民身份的紧张话语。有时,为了“赋权”那些被诊断患有精神分裂症的人,让他们成为受人尊敬的白手起家的公民,这会给那些日常生活压力已经很大的人带来更大的社会文化压力。一个以康复为导向的精神卫生系统必须考虑到被诊断患有精神分裂症的人对压力的敏感性,并为消费者提供相关的应对机制。任何将美国精神卫生保健实践出口到世界其他地区的尝试都必须认识到:(1)社会文化条件会影响精神分裂症的结果;(2)发展中国家的精神分裂症结果已经优于美国;(3)在发展中国家导致“更好”结果的原因很多可能依赖于当地相关技术来应对压力。