Edgerton R B, Cohen A
Department of Psychiatry, UCLA School of Medicine 90024-1759.
Br J Psychiatry. 1994 Feb;164(2):222-31. doi: 10.1192/bjp.164.2.222.
The World Health Organization's International Pilot Study on Schizophrenia (IPSS) and subsequent Determinants of Outcomes of Severe Mental Disorder (DOSMD) studies have reported that the course of schizophrenia is more favourable in 'developing' than 'developed' societies. The 1992 DOSMD study attributes this difference to culture. We review studies concerning the course of schizophrenia and conclude that the evidence for a more favourable course in developing societies is not conclusive. Indeed, a favourable course has also been reported in various industrialised societies. We also raise questions about the findings reported in the recent DOSMD study, including the conclusion that the putatively more favourable course is a product of culture. Finally, we argue that longitudinal, direct observation of patients in their natural environments must be carried out before variations in the course of schizophrenia can be adequately understood.
世界卫生组织的精神分裂症国际试点研究(IPSS)以及随后的严重精神障碍结局决定因素(DOSMD)研究报告称,精神分裂症的病程在“发展中”社会比“发达”社会更为有利。1992年的DOSMD研究将这种差异归因于文化。我们回顾了有关精神分裂症病程的研究,并得出结论,发展中社会病程更有利的证据并不确凿。事实上,在各种工业化社会中也有病程有利的报告。我们还对最近的DOSMD研究报告的结果提出了质疑,包括关于假定更有利的病程是文化产物的结论。最后,我们认为,在能够充分理解精神分裂症病程的差异之前,必须对患者在其自然环境中的情况进行纵向、直接观察。