The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.
Cell Transplant. 2010;19(6):743-50. doi: 10.3727/096368910X508843. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
Intraperitoneal (IP) anesthesia is commonly used for laboratory animal experiments including rat islet isolation. However, the direct effects of anesthetics on pancreatic islets have been neglected. This study compared the islet function and recovery yield from rats that were anesthetized using IP and intramuscular (IM) injection. In addition, the lag time required to lose deep pain was measured in the following anesthetics combinations. Lewis rats were anesthetized using ketamine and xylazine (K/X) or zoletil and xylazine (Z/X). A glucose challenge test was performed on each group of prepared islets. The effect of the anesthetic agents (e.g., ketamine, zoletil, xylazine alone, and the combination of K/X and Z/X) on cell lines (rat insulinoma; RIN-5F) was investigated by determining their effect on the cell viability, the amount of insulin, and insulin mRNA expression levels of RIN-5F. The time needed for deep anesthesia in IM anesthesia was significantly shortened in comparison to IP [K/X (IM: 313 ± 66 s, IP: 371 ± 84 s) and Z/X (IM: 206 ± 76 s, IP: 245 ± 92 s)]. In addition, number of isolated islet yield by IM anesthesia was significantly improved [K/X (IM: 1530 ± 242, IP: 1245 ± 149) and Z/X (IM: 1136 ± 226, IP: 511 ± 154)]. The functions of fresh islets, indicated by the stimulation index, acquired under IM anesthesia was better preserved than that of IP. The viability and the insulin secretion of RIN-5F were decreased at 24 and 48 h. Insulin gene expression levels were decreased at 24 h as well. Anesthetics may be absorbed through the pancreas surface to the islets and have a direct effect, resulting in islet exposure and deterioration during isolation. In conclusion, for rodent islet isolation, IM anesthesia is simpler and safer in comparison to IP anesthesia.
腹腔内(IP)麻醉常用于包括大鼠胰岛分离在内的实验室动物实验。然而,麻醉剂对胰腺胰岛的直接影响一直被忽视。本研究比较了使用腹腔内和肌肉内(IM)注射麻醉的大鼠的胰岛功能和回收率。此外,还测量了以下麻醉剂组合中失去深度疼痛所需的滞后时间。使用氯胺酮和甲苯噻嗪(K/X)或唑来膦酸和甲苯噻嗪(Z/X)麻醉 Lewis 大鼠。对每组制备的胰岛进行葡萄糖刺激试验。通过测定麻醉剂(如氯胺酮、唑来膦酸、甲苯噻嗪单独以及 K/X 和 Z/X 的组合)对细胞系(大鼠胰岛素瘤;RIN-5F)的影响,研究其对细胞活力、胰岛素含量和胰岛素 mRNA 表达水平的影响。与 IP 相比,IM 麻醉的深度麻醉时间明显缩短[K/X(IM:313±66s,IP:371±84s)和 Z/X(IM:206±76s,IP:245±92s)]。此外,IM 麻醉的胰岛分离产量也显著提高[K/X(IM:1530±242,IP:1245±149)和 Z/X(IM:1136±226,IP:511±154)]。IM 麻醉下获得的新鲜胰岛刺激指数表明其功能更好地保留。24 和 48 小时后,RIN-5F 的活力和胰岛素分泌减少。胰岛素基因表达水平在 24 小时也降低。麻醉剂可能通过胰腺表面被吸收到胰岛中,并产生直接影响,导致胰岛在分离过程中暴露和恶化。总之,与 IP 麻醉相比,IM 麻醉在啮齿动物胰岛分离中更简单、更安全。