Suppr超能文献

免疫印迹法与酶联免疫吸附测定法在检测格林-巴利综合征患儿抗神经节苷脂抗体中的比较

Comparison of immunoblotting and ELISA for detection of anti-ganglioside antibodies in children with Guillain-Barre syndrome.

作者信息

Bonyadi Mohammad Reza, Barzegar Mohammad, Badalzadeh Reza, Hashemilar Mazyar

机构信息

Department of Immunology, Drug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

出版信息

Iran J Immunol. 2010 Jun;7(2):117-23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anti-ganglioside antibody assays are widely used for diagnosis of autoimmune peripheral neuropathies.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine serum levels of anti-ganglioside antibodies in children with Guillain-Barre syndrome by immunoblotting technique and compare the results with those obtained by ELISA method.

METHOD

In this investigation, 50 children with Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) who were admitted from July 2006 to July 2008, to Tabriz Children's Hospital in the northwest of Iran were studied. 30 children admitted for various other reasons than GBS were randomly selected as a control group. The levels of anti-ganglioside antibodies in serum were measured by ELISA and immunoblotting methods using commercial kits.

RESULTS

Anti-ganglioside antibodies (IgG) were detected in 16 (32%) GBS patients and in 1 (3.3%) control using ELISA assay. However, by employing immunoblotting technique, antibodies against seven gangliosides were found positive in 28 (56%) of GBS patients and none in the control group. The sensitivities of immunoblotting and ELISA methods were 56% and 32% and their specificities were 100% and 97%, respectively (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

According to the clinical criteria of GBS, the specificity and sensitivity of immunoblotting was better than those of ELISA. It is important to notice that the immunoblotting method is able to measure the seven types of antibodies (GM1, GM2, GM3, GD1a, GD1b, GT1b, and GQ1b) simultaneously and it is an easy, routine method with a lower cost.

摘要

背景

抗神经节苷脂抗体检测广泛用于自身免疫性周围神经病的诊断。

目的

本研究旨在通过免疫印迹技术测定吉兰-巴雷综合征患儿血清抗神经节苷脂抗体水平,并将结果与酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)法所得结果进行比较。

方法

在本次调查中,对2006年7月至2008年7月收治于伊朗西北部大不里士儿童医院的50例吉兰-巴雷综合征(GBS)患儿进行了研究。随机选取30例因GBS以外的各种其他原因入院的患儿作为对照组。使用商用试剂盒通过ELISA和免疫印迹法测定血清中抗神经节苷脂抗体水平。

结果

采用ELISA法检测,16例(32%)GBS患者和1例(3.3%)对照者检测到抗神经节苷脂抗体(IgG)。然而,采用免疫印迹技术,28例(56%)GBS患者检测到针对七种神经节苷脂的抗体呈阳性,而对照组无一例阳性。免疫印迹法和ELISA法的敏感性分别为56%和32%,特异性分别为100%和97%(p<0.001)。

结论

根据GBS的临床标准,免疫印迹法的特异性和敏感性优于ELISA法。需要注意的是,免疫印迹法能够同时检测七种抗体(GM1、GM2、GM3、GD1a、GD1b、GT1b和GQ1b),且是一种简便、常规且成本较低的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验