Surface modification for bonding between amalgam and orthodontic brackets.

OBJECTIVE

Testing of methods to enhance the shear bond strength (SBS) between orthodontic metal brackets and amalgam by sandblasting and different primers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three hundred samples of amalgam restorations (KerrAlloy) were prepared in self-cured acrylic blocks, polished, and divided into two groups: nonsandblasted and sandblasted. Each group was divided into five subgroups with different primers used in surface treatment methods, with a control group of bonded brackets on human mandibular incisors. Following the surface treatments, mandibular incisor brackets (Unitek) were bonded on the amalgam with adhesive resin (Transbond XT). The SBS of the samples was tested. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) and failure modes were then determined under a stereo-microscope. Two-way analysis of variance, Chi-square, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed to calculate the correlations between and among the SBS and ARI values, the failure modes, and surface roughness results.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences of SBS among the different adhesive primers and sandblasting methods ( < 0.05). The sandblasted amalgam with Assure Plus showed the highest SBS ( < 0.001). Samples mainly showed an ARI score = 1 and mix-mode failure. There was a statistically significant difference of surface roughness between nonsandblasted amalgam and sandblasted amalgam ( < 0.05), but no significant differences among priming agents ( > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Using adhesive primers with sandblasting together effectively enhances the SBS between orthodontic metal brackets and amalgam. The two primers with the ingredient methacryloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) monomer, Alloy Primer and Assure Plus, were the most effective. Including sandblasting in the treatment is essential to achieve the bonding strength required.