Tilley Helen
Department of History, Classics, and Archaeology, Birkbeck College, University of London, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HX, United Kingdom.
Isis. 2010 Mar;101(1):110-9. doi: 10.1086/652692.
Scholars in imperial and science studies have recently begun to examine more systematically the different ways knowledge systems around the world have intersected. This essay concentrates on one aspect of this process, the codification of research into "primitive" or "indigenous" knowledge, especially knowledge that was transmitted orally, and argues that such investigations were a by-product of four interrelated phenomena: the globalization of the sciences themselves, particularly those fields that took the earth and its inhabitants as their object of analysis; the professionalization of anthropology and its growing emphasis on studying other cultures' medical, technical, and natural knowledge; the European push, in the late nineteenth century, toward "global colonialism" and the ethnographic research that accompanied colonial state building; and, finally, colonized and marginalized peoples' challenges to scientific epistemologies and their paradoxical call that scientists study their knowledge systems more carefully. These phenomena came together on a global scale in the decades surrounding the turn of the twentieth century to produce a subgenre of research within the sciences, here labeled "vernacular science," focused explicitly on "native" knowledge.
帝国研究和科学研究领域的学者们最近开始更系统地审视世界各地知识体系相互交叉的不同方式。本文聚焦于这一过程的一个方面,即将对“原始”或“本土”知识(尤其是通过口头传承的知识)的研究进行编纂,并认为此类调查是四种相互关联现象的副产品:科学本身的全球化,尤其是那些以地球及其居民为分析对象的领域;人类学的专业化及其对研究其他文化的医学、技术和自然知识的日益重视;19世纪后期欧洲向“全球殖民主义”的推进以及伴随殖民国家建设而来的人种志研究;最后,被殖民和边缘化群体对科学认识论的挑战以及他们矛盾的呼吁,即科学家更仔细地研究他们的知识体系。在20世纪之交前后的几十年里,这些现象在全球范围内汇聚在一起,催生了科学领域内一种特定的研究类型,这里称之为“本土科学”,它明确聚焦于“本土”知识。