Clough G
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, St Mary's Hospital Medical School, London, U.K.
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1991;55(1):47-69. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(91)90011-g.
This article attempts to review some of the advances made during the past few years in our understanding of the nature of the barrier presented by the endothelial cell wall and how it may contribute to the regulation of exchange between blood and tissues. It has concentrated on a small number of experimental techniques which have yielded information on the correlation between structure and function of the endothelial cell wall and which have emphasized the potentially dynamic characteristics of the barrier. Whilst there now seems to be little dispute as to the location of the fluid conducting channels across the endothelial cell wall, within the clefts, fenestrae and in inflammation the open cell junctions, it has proved difficult to identify the molecular filter which limits macromolecular exchange across these pathways. In fenestrated endothelium it has been suggested that the filter resides at the fenestral diaphragms or in the underlying basement membrane, while in continuous endothelium there is strong support in the literature that the filter is located within the intercellular cleft, at regions of closely apposed cell membranes, or in the case of a vesicular pathway, at the necks or diaphragms of the vesicle openings. Alternatively, there is a considerable and increasing body of experimental evidence that macromolecular movement is retarded by the endothelial cell coat which lines the whole of the endothelial cell surface and covers the openings of interendothelial cell clefts, fenestral diaphragms and vesicle openings. It is believed to comprise glycoproteins secreted and regulated by the endothelial cells themselves and to have associated with it plasma proteins, particularly serum albumin. Expression of this glycocalyx and its modification have been demonstrated in vivo and in cultures of isolated endothelial cells, in vitro. Experiments using single microvessels in which a correlation between structure and function can be most readily made, offer further evidence that the clefts between endothelial cells are quantitively more than sufficient in extent to accommodate the fluid fluxes measured in even the most highly permeable vessels. They further demonstrate that the dramatic increases in fluid flux seen in inflammation result from a modulation of endothelial cell shape to form interendothelial cell gaps by activation of intracellular contractile mechanisms, mediated by changes in intracellular calcium. Increases in macromolecular leakage may only be seen when gap formation is accompanied by extensive modulation of the intercellular cement substance, or glycocalyx filling those gaps.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
本文试图回顾过去几年中我们在理解内皮细胞壁所形成屏障的性质以及它如何有助于调节血液与组织间物质交换方面取得的一些进展。文章着重介绍了少数几种实验技术,这些技术提供了有关内皮细胞壁结构与功能相关性的信息,并强调了该屏障潜在的动态特性。尽管目前对于贯穿内皮细胞壁的液体传导通道的位置,即在裂隙、窗孔以及炎症状态下开放的细胞连接部位,似乎争议不大,但事实证明,要确定限制大分子通过这些途径进行交换的分子过滤器却很困难。在有窗孔的内皮细胞中,有人提出过滤器位于窗孔隔膜或其下方的基底膜;而在连续内皮细胞中,文献中有充分证据表明过滤器位于细胞间裂隙处,即细胞膜紧密相邻的区域,或者在通过囊泡途径时,位于囊泡开口的颈部或隔膜处。另外,有大量且不断增加的实验证据表明,大分子的移动会受到内皮细胞表面覆盖物的阻碍,该覆盖物覆盖了整个内皮细胞表面,并覆盖内皮细胞间裂隙、窗孔隔膜和囊泡开口。据信它由内皮细胞自身分泌和调节的糖蛋白组成,并与血浆蛋白,尤其是血清白蛋白相关联。这种糖萼的表达及其修饰已在体内以及体外分离的内皮细胞培养物中得到证实。使用单个微血管进行的实验能够最容易地建立结构与功能之间的相关性,这些实验进一步证明,内皮细胞间的裂隙在数量上足以容纳即使是渗透性最高的血管中所测得的液体通量。它们还进一步表明,炎症中观察到的液体通量的显著增加是由于细胞内收缩机制被激活,导致内皮细胞形状发生改变,形成内皮细胞间间隙,而这种激活是由细胞内钙的变化介导的。只有当间隙形成伴随着细胞间胶状物质的广泛调节,或者糖萼填充这些间隙时,才会出现大分子泄漏增加的情况。(摘要截选至400字)