• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

昆士兰和德国一级创伤中心收治的重伤创伤患者的比较。

A comparison of severely injured trauma patients admitted to level 1 trauma centres in Queensland and Germany.

作者信息

Nijboer Johanna M M, Wullschleger Martin E, Nielsen Susan E, McNamee Anitia M, Lefering Rolf, ten Duis Hendrik-Jan, Schuetz Michael A

机构信息

Department of Surgery - Trauma Service, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2010 Mar;80(3):145-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05210.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05210.x
PMID:20575915
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The allocation of a trauma network in Queensland is still in the developmental phase. In a search for indicators to improve trauma care both locally as state-wide, a study was carried out comparing trauma patients in Queensland to trauma patients in Germany, a country with 82.4 million inhabitants and a well-established trauma system.

METHODS

Trauma patients > or =15 years of age, with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > or = 16 admitted to the Princess Alexandra Hospital (PAH) and to the 59 German hospitals participating in the Trauma Registry of the German Society for Trauma Surgery (DGU-G) during the year 2005 were retrospectively identified and analysed.

RESULTS

Both cohorts are comparable when it comes to demographics and injury mechanism, but differ significantly in other important aspects. Striking is the low number of primary admitted patients in the PAH cohort: 58% versus 83% in the DGU-G cohort. PAH patients were less physiologically deranged and less severely injured: ISS 25.2 +/- 9.9 versus 29.9 +/- 13.1 (P < 0.001). Subsequently, they less often needed surgery (61% versus 79%), ICU admission (49% versus 92%) and had a lower mortality: 9.8% versus 17.9% of the DGU-G cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Relevant differences were the low number of primary admissions, the lesser severity of injuries, and the low mortality of the patients treated at the PAH. These differences are likely to be interrelated and Queensland's size and suboptimal organization of trauma care may have played an important role.

摘要

背景

昆士兰州创伤网络的分配仍处于发展阶段。为了寻找可在本地及全州范围内改善创伤护理的指标,开展了一项研究,将昆士兰州的创伤患者与德国的创伤患者进行比较。德国有8240万人口,拥有完善的创伤系统。

方法

回顾性确定并分析了2005年期间入住亚历山德拉公主医院(PAH)的15岁及以上、损伤严重度评分(ISS)≥16的创伤患者,以及参与德国创伤外科学会创伤登记处(DGU-G)的59家德国医院的创伤患者。

结果

两组在人口统计学和损伤机制方面具有可比性,但在其他重要方面存在显著差异。引人注目的是,PAH组初次入院患者数量较少:58%,而DGU-G组为83%。PAH患者的生理紊乱程度较轻,损伤程度也较轻:ISS为25.2±9.9,而DGU-G组为29.9±13.1(P<0.001)。随后,他们需要手术的频率较低(61%对79%)、入住重症监护病房的频率较低(49%对92%),死亡率也较低:为DGU-G组的9.8%对17.9%。

结论

相关差异在于PAH的初次入院患者数量少、损伤严重程度较低以及患者死亡率较低。这些差异可能相互关联,昆士兰州的规模和创伤护理组织欠佳可能起到了重要作用。

相似文献

1
A comparison of severely injured trauma patients admitted to level 1 trauma centres in Queensland and Germany.昆士兰和德国一级创伤中心收治的重伤创伤患者的比较。
ANZ J Surg. 2010 Mar;80(3):145-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05210.x.
2
300 all-terrain vehicle crashes: an East Tennessee trauma center's experience.300起全地形车事故:东田纳西州一家创伤中心的经验
Tenn Med. 2009 Aug;102(8):45-7.
3
A decade of intensive care unit trauma admissions in Auckland.奥克兰十年重症监护病房创伤入院情况
N Z Med J. 2000 Aug 11;113(1115):327-30.
4
Pre-hospital and in-hospital parameters and outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury: a comparison between German and Australian trauma registries.创伤性脑损伤患者的院前和院内参数及结局:德国和澳大利亚创伤登记处的比较。
Injury. 2010 Sep;41(9):901-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.01.002. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
5
Pre-hospital rescue times and actions in severe trauma. A comparison between two trauma systems: Germany and the Netherlands.严重创伤的院前救援时间及行动:德国和荷兰两个创伤系统的比较
Injury. 2014 Oct;45 Suppl 3:S43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.017.
6
Assessment of mortality in older trauma patients sustaining injuries from falls or motor vehicle collisions treated in regional level I trauma centers.对在地区一级创伤中心接受治疗的因跌倒或机动车碰撞受伤的老年创伤患者的死亡率评估。
Ann Surg. 2009 Mar;249(3):488-95. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819a8b4f.
7
Proportion of seriously injured patients admitted to hospitals in the US with a high annual injured patient volume: a metric of regionalized trauma care.美国每年收治重伤患者数量较多的医院中重伤患者的比例:区域创伤护理的一项指标。
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Feb;206(2):212-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.08.019. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
8
Hypothermia and associated outcomes in seriously injured trauma patients in a predominantly sub-tropical climate.亚热带气候为主地区重伤创伤患者的体温过低及相关后果
Resuscitation. 2009 Feb;80(2):217-23. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.10.021. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
9
Improved trauma patient outcomes after implementation of a dedicated trauma admitting service.实施专门的创伤收治服务后创伤患者的治疗效果得到改善。
Injury. 2009 Jan;40(1):99-103. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.06.034. Epub 2008 Dec 30.
10
Trauma care at rural level III trauma centers in a state trauma system.某州创伤系统中农村三级创伤中心的创伤护理
J Trauma. 2007 Feb;62(2):498-503. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000197671.00818.76.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiological comparison between the Navarra Major Trauma Registry and the German Trauma Registry (TR-DGU®).纳瓦拉重大创伤登记处与德国创伤登记处(TR-DGU®)的流行病学比较。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Nov 2;25(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0453-2.
2
Impact of Trauma System Structure on Injury Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.创伤系统结构对损伤结局的影响:一项系统评价与Meta分析
World J Surg. 2018 May;42(5):1327-1339. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4292-0.
3
Trauma systems: models of prehospital and inhospital care.
创伤系统:院前与院内护理模式
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2012 Jun;38(3):253-60. doi: 10.1007/s00068-012-0192-z. Epub 2012 May 16.
4
Trauma registry comparison: six-year results in trauma care in Southern Finland and Germany.创伤登记比较:芬兰南部和德国六年创伤护理结果
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015 Oct;41(5):509-16. doi: 10.1007/s00068-014-0470-z. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
5
Characterization of image transfer patterns in a regional trauma network.区域创伤网络中图像传输模式的特征分析
J Med Syst. 2014 Nov;38(11):137. doi: 10.1007/s10916-014-0137-7. Epub 2014 Sep 30.