University of Manchester, National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, Manchester, UK.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2010 Jun;54(6):479-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01263.x.
Routine health checks have gained prominence as a way of detecting unmet need in primary care for adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) and general practitioners are being incentivised in the UK to carry out health checks for many conditions through an incentivisation scheme known as the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF). However, little is known about the data being routinely recorded in such health checks in relation to people with ID as practices are currently only incentivised to keep a register of people with ID. The aim of this study was to explore the additional value of a health check for people with ID compared with standard care provided through the current QOF structure.
Representative practices were recruited using a stratified sampling approach in four primary care trusts to carry out health checks over a 6-month period. The extracted data were divided into two aggregated informational domains for the purpose of multilevel regression analysis: 'ID-specific' (containing data on visual assessment, hearing assessment, behaviour assessment, bladder function, bowel function and feeding assessment) and financially incentivised QOF targets (blood pressure, smoking status, ethnicity, body mass index, urine analysis and carer details) which are incentivised processes.
A total of 651 patients with ID were identified in 27 practices. Only nine practices undertook a health check on 92 of their patients with ID. Significant differences were found in the recorded information, between those who underwent a health check and those who did not (P < 0.001, chi(2) = 56.3). In the group that had health check, recorded information was on average higher for the 'QOF targets' domain, compared with the 'ID-specific' domain, by 58.7% (95% CI: 54.1, 63.3, P < 0.001).
If incentives are to be used as a method for improving care for people with ID through health checks a more targeted approach focused on ID-specific health issues might be more appropriate than an extensive health check.
常规健康检查已成为在初级保健中发现智力残疾(ID)成年人未满足需求的一种方式,英国的全科医生通过一种名为质量和结果框架(QOF)的激励计划被激励为许多疾病进行健康检查。然而,由于目前仅激励实践记录 ID 患者的登记册,因此对 ID 患者进行常规健康检查中记录的数据知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨与标准 QOF 结构相比,对 ID 患者进行健康检查的额外价值。
使用分层抽样方法在四个初级保健信托中招募代表性实践,以在 6 个月的时间内进行健康检查。提取的数据分为两个聚合信息域,用于多层次回归分析:“ID 特定”(包含视觉评估、听力评估、行为评估、膀胱功能、肠道功能和喂养评估的数据)和经济激励 QOF 目标(血压、吸烟状况、族裔、体重指数、尿液分析和护理人员详细信息),这是激励过程。
在 27 家实践中确定了 651 名 ID 患者。只有 9 家实践对其 92 名 ID 患者进行了健康检查。在接受健康检查和未接受健康检查的患者之间,记录的信息存在显著差异(P < 0.001,chi(2) = 56.3)。在接受健康检查的组中,与“ID 特定”域相比,“QOF 目标”域的记录信息平均高 58.7%(95%CI:54.1,63.3,P < 0.001)。
如果激励措施被用作通过健康检查改善 ID 患者护理的一种方法,那么关注 ID 特定健康问题的更有针对性的方法可能比广泛的健康检查更合适。