Suppr超能文献

比较可调缝线与激光缝线松解在小梁切除术中的降眼压效果。

A comparison of the intraocular pressure lowering effect of adjustable suture versus laser suture lysis for trabeculectomy.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Kanmon Medical Center, Shimonoseki, Japan.

出版信息

J Glaucoma. 2011 Apr-May;20(4):228-33. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181e3d0e4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the intraocular pressure lowering effect of adjustable sutures and laser suture lysis for trabeculectomy in eyes with primary open angle glaucoma.

METHODS

Fifty patients with primary open angle glaucoma were studied. Eyes were assigned randomly to either trabeculectomy augmented with mitomycin C with adjustable sutures or with laser suture lysis. Patients were followed up for 12 months and success rate based on intraocular pressure was compared. Adjustable sutures were carried out as reported by Wells et al.

RESULTS

Mean baseline intraocular pressure was 27.8±2.8 mm Hg in the adjustable suture group and 27.3±2.9 mm Hg in the laser suture lysis group (P=0.7). Mean postoperative intraocular pressure was 12.1±2.0 mm Hg at 3 months, 12.7±3.2 mm Hg at 6 months, and 12.9±3.4 mm Hg at 12 months in the adjustable suture group and 12.1±2.6 mm Hg at 3 months, 13.1±4.7 mm Hg at 6 months, and 13.4±3.5 mm Hg at 12 months in the laser suture lysis group. There was no significant difference in the mean intraocular pressure between the groups at any time point. At 12 months, 24 patients (96%) in the adjustable suture group and 23 patients (92%) in the laser suture lysis group achieved an intraocular pressure of ≥20 mm Hg without medication and a minimum of 30 percent reduction (P=0.7). Significant anterior chamber reduction was found in no patient (0%) in the adjustable suture group and 6 patients (24%) in the laser suture lysis group after loosening of the adjustable sutures or laser suture lysis.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in hypotensive efficacy between adjustable suture group and laser suture lysis group. The use of adjustable sutures may reduce the incidence of shallow anterior chamber and hypotony after postoperative intraocular pressure lowering procedures.

摘要

目的

比较可调节缝线与激光松解缝线在原发性开角型青光眼小梁切除术中的降眼压效果。

方法

对 50 例原发性开角型青光眼患者进行研究。将患者随机分为接受丝裂霉素 C 增强小梁切除术联合可调节缝线或激光松解缝线的两组。患者随访 12 个月,并比较基于眼压的成功率。可调节缝线的操作方法按 Wells 等人的报道进行。

结果

可调节缝线组的平均基线眼压为 27.8±2.8mmHg,激光松解缝线组为 27.3±2.9mmHg(P=0.7)。可调节缝线组术后 3 个月的平均眼压为 12.1±2.0mmHg,6 个月为 12.7±3.2mmHg,12 个月为 12.9±3.4mmHg;激光松解缝线组术后 3 个月的平均眼压为 12.1±2.6mmHg,6 个月为 13.1±4.7mmHg,12 个月为 13.4±3.5mmHg。两组在任何时间点的平均眼压均无显著差异。在 12 个月时,可调节缝线组 24 例(96%)患者和激光松解缝线组 23 例(92%)患者无需药物治疗即可将眼压控制在≥20mmHg,眼压至少降低 30%(P=0.7)。在可调节缝线组中,没有患者(0%)在松解可调节缝线后出现明显的前房变浅,而在激光松解缝线组中,有 6 例(24%)患者出现这种情况。

结论

可调节缝线组与激光松解缝线组的降压效果无显著差异。使用可调节缝线可能会降低术后眼压降低术后浅前房和低眼压的发生率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验