Department of Ophthalmology, Kanmon Medical Center, Shimonoseki, Japan.
J Glaucoma. 2011 Apr-May;20(4):228-33. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181e3d0e4.
To compare the intraocular pressure lowering effect of adjustable sutures and laser suture lysis for trabeculectomy in eyes with primary open angle glaucoma.
Fifty patients with primary open angle glaucoma were studied. Eyes were assigned randomly to either trabeculectomy augmented with mitomycin C with adjustable sutures or with laser suture lysis. Patients were followed up for 12 months and success rate based on intraocular pressure was compared. Adjustable sutures were carried out as reported by Wells et al.
Mean baseline intraocular pressure was 27.8±2.8 mm Hg in the adjustable suture group and 27.3±2.9 mm Hg in the laser suture lysis group (P=0.7). Mean postoperative intraocular pressure was 12.1±2.0 mm Hg at 3 months, 12.7±3.2 mm Hg at 6 months, and 12.9±3.4 mm Hg at 12 months in the adjustable suture group and 12.1±2.6 mm Hg at 3 months, 13.1±4.7 mm Hg at 6 months, and 13.4±3.5 mm Hg at 12 months in the laser suture lysis group. There was no significant difference in the mean intraocular pressure between the groups at any time point. At 12 months, 24 patients (96%) in the adjustable suture group and 23 patients (92%) in the laser suture lysis group achieved an intraocular pressure of ≥20 mm Hg without medication and a minimum of 30 percent reduction (P=0.7). Significant anterior chamber reduction was found in no patient (0%) in the adjustable suture group and 6 patients (24%) in the laser suture lysis group after loosening of the adjustable sutures or laser suture lysis.
There was no significant difference in hypotensive efficacy between adjustable suture group and laser suture lysis group. The use of adjustable sutures may reduce the incidence of shallow anterior chamber and hypotony after postoperative intraocular pressure lowering procedures.
比较可调节缝线与激光松解缝线在原发性开角型青光眼小梁切除术中的降眼压效果。
对 50 例原发性开角型青光眼患者进行研究。将患者随机分为接受丝裂霉素 C 增强小梁切除术联合可调节缝线或激光松解缝线的两组。患者随访 12 个月,并比较基于眼压的成功率。可调节缝线的操作方法按 Wells 等人的报道进行。
可调节缝线组的平均基线眼压为 27.8±2.8mmHg,激光松解缝线组为 27.3±2.9mmHg(P=0.7)。可调节缝线组术后 3 个月的平均眼压为 12.1±2.0mmHg,6 个月为 12.7±3.2mmHg,12 个月为 12.9±3.4mmHg;激光松解缝线组术后 3 个月的平均眼压为 12.1±2.6mmHg,6 个月为 13.1±4.7mmHg,12 个月为 13.4±3.5mmHg。两组在任何时间点的平均眼压均无显著差异。在 12 个月时,可调节缝线组 24 例(96%)患者和激光松解缝线组 23 例(92%)患者无需药物治疗即可将眼压控制在≥20mmHg,眼压至少降低 30%(P=0.7)。在可调节缝线组中,没有患者(0%)在松解可调节缝线后出现明显的前房变浅,而在激光松解缝线组中,有 6 例(24%)患者出现这种情况。
可调节缝线组与激光松解缝线组的降压效果无显著差异。使用可调节缝线可能会降低术后眼压降低术后浅前房和低眼压的发生率。