• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单缝线小梁切除术与可拆除缝线小梁切除术的对比研究

Comparative study of trabeculectomy using single sutures versus releasable sutures.

作者信息

Matlach Juliane, Hoffmann Niels, Freiberg Florentina J, Grehn Franz, Klink Thomas

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;6:1019-27. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S32503. Epub 2012 Jul 6.

DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S32503
PMID:22848142
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3402124/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of trabeculectomy using single sutures or releasable sutures.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed the medical records of 61 patients who had undergone trabeculectomy using single sutures (n = 33, 54.1%) or releasable sutures (n = 28, 45.9%). The scleral flap was secured with a mean 3.9 (range 3-5) single sutures in 33 patients and with three releasable sutures in 28 patients. Primary outcomes were the success rate, based on intraocular pressure and medication usage, and the frequency of complications and post-surgical interventions. The criteria used to determine complete success were, first, intraocular pressure < 18 mmHg and, second, ≤21 mmHg and ≥20% intraocular pressure reduction without glaucoma medication.

RESULTS

All patients had an intraocular pressure ≤ 21 mmHg; 87.5% in the single suture group and 92.6% in the releasable suture group had an intraocular pressure < 18 mmHg at 24 months. There was a highly significant reduction in intraocular pressure to baseline values in both groups at the last visit. Applying the first criterion, complete success was achieved in 57.6% of patients with single sutures and 71.4% with releasable sutures, and based on the second criterion, 66.7% and 71.4%, respectively. No significant difference was found between the groups with regard to intraocular pressure, or success or complication rates.

CONCLUSION

The results of trabeculectomy using single sutures or releasable sutures are equivalent. Therefore, the choice of suture technique should be based on individual patient requirements and surgeon experience.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较使用单根缝线或可松解缝线进行小梁切除术的效果。

方法

这项回顾性研究分析了61例行小梁切除术患者的病历,其中使用单根缝线的患者有33例(54.1%),使用可松解缝线的患者有28例(45.9%)。33例患者用平均3.9根(范围3 - 5根)单根缝线固定巩膜瓣,28例患者用3根可松解缝线固定。主要结局指标为基于眼压和药物使用情况的成功率、并发症发生频率及术后干预情况。判定完全成功的标准为:第一,眼压<18 mmHg;第二,眼压≤21 mmHg且在未使用青光眼药物情况下眼压降低≥20%。

结果

所有患者眼压均≤21 mmHg;单根缝线组87.5%的患者和可松解缝线组92.6%的患者在24个月时眼压<18 mmHg。两组在末次随访时眼压均较基线值有极显著降低。按照第一个标准,单根缝线组57.6%的患者和可松解缝线组71.4%的患者取得了完全成功;按照第二个标准,分别为66.7%和71.4%。两组在眼压、成功率或并发症发生率方面未发现显著差异。

结论

使用单根缝线或可松解缝线进行小梁切除术的效果相当。因此,缝线技术的选择应基于患者个体需求和术者经验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3358/3402124/4cfdf19b5faa/opth-6-1019f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3358/3402124/94a40d981e1d/opth-6-1019f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3358/3402124/f8fb7d24332b/opth-6-1019f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3358/3402124/4cfdf19b5faa/opth-6-1019f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3358/3402124/94a40d981e1d/opth-6-1019f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3358/3402124/f8fb7d24332b/opth-6-1019f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3358/3402124/4cfdf19b5faa/opth-6-1019f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative study of trabeculectomy using single sutures versus releasable sutures.单缝线小梁切除术与可拆除缝线小梁切除术的对比研究
Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;6:1019-27. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S32503. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
2
Trabeculectomy: is releasable suture trabeculectomy a cause of better bleb?小梁切除术:可松解缝线小梁切除术是否是更好的滤泡的原因?
Rom J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan-Mar;65(1):54-58. doi: 10.22336/rjo.2021.10.
3
Laser suture lysis or releasable sutures after trabeculectomy.小梁切除术后的激光缝线溶解或可拆除缝线
J Glaucoma. 2007 Mar;16(2):240-5. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31802d6ded.
4
Trabeculectomy with releasable sutures: a prospective, randomized pilot study.可松解缝线小梁切除术:一项前瞻性随机试验研究
Arch Ophthalmol. 1998 Oct;116(10):1288-93. doi: 10.1001/archopht.116.10.1288.
5
Regular Versus Releasable Sutures in Surgery for Primary Congenital Glaucoma.原发性先天性青光眼手术中普通缝线与可拆除缝线的比较
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2017 Sep 1;54(5):295-301. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20170320-01. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
6
Comparison of 3 different releasable suture techniques in trabeculectomy.小梁切除术中三种不同可松解缝线技术的比较。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jun 10;26(4):307-14. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000718. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
7
Outcome of trabeculectomy with 5-fluorouracil using releasable suture technique in a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital.尼日利亚一家三级医院采用可松解缝线技术行小梁切除术联合5-氟尿嘧啶治疗的结果
West Afr J Med. 2011 May-Jun;30(3):173-7.
8
Efficacy and complications of releasable suture trabeculectomy and standard trabeculectomy.可松解缝线小梁切除术与标准小梁切除术的疗效及并发症
Int Ophthalmol. 2005 Feb-Apr;26(1-2):9-14. doi: 10.1007/s10792-006-0002-x. Epub 2006 Jun 15.
9
Trabeculectomy with releasable sutures.带可松解缝线的小梁切除术
Arch Ophthalmol. 1994 Jan;112(1):62-6. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1994.01090130072020.
10
Trabeculectomy with versus without releasable sutures for glaucoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.青光眼巩膜切除术联合可松解缝线与不联合可松解缝线的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar 31;14:41. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-14-41.

引用本文的文献

1
Midterm outcome of single scleral suture technique in trabeculectomy and phacotrabeculectomy: a simplified approach.小梁切除术和白内障小梁切除术中单巩膜缝合技术的中期结果:一种简化方法
Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun 13;11:2515841419854829. doi: 10.1177/2515841419854829. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
2
Trabeculectomy with versus without releasable sutures for glaucoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.青光眼巩膜切除术联合可松解缝线与不联合可松解缝线的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar 31;14:41. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-14-41.
3
[Modern filtration surgery. An update].

本文引用的文献

1
The prognostic value of the wuerzburg bleb classification score for the outcome of trabeculectomy.威斯巴登滤过泡分级评分对小梁切除术结果的预后价值。
Ophthalmologica. 2011;225(1):55-60. doi: 10.1159/000314717. Epub 2010 Aug 14.
2
A comparison of the intraocular pressure lowering effect of adjustable suture versus laser suture lysis for trabeculectomy.比较可调缝线与激光缝线松解在小梁切除术中的降眼压效果。
J Glaucoma. 2011 Apr-May;20(4):228-33. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181e3d0e4.
3
A new 6 o'clock traction suture technique for glaucoma filtration surgery.
[现代滤过性手术。最新进展]
Ophthalmologe. 2013 Apr;110(4):299-305. doi: 10.1007/s00347-012-2710-0.
青光眼滤过手术的一种新的 6 点钟牵引缝线技术。
J Glaucoma. 2011 Jan;20(1):28-9. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181d1d348.
4
[Suture management after trabeculectomy].[小梁切除术后的缝线管理]
Ophthalmologe. 2009 Apr;106(4):364-7. doi: 10.1007/s00347-009-1921-5.
5
Modulation of wound healing during and after glaucoma surgery.青光眼手术期间及术后伤口愈合的调节
Prog Brain Res. 2008;173:237-54. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)01117-5.
6
Releasable suture technique.可松解缝合技术。
J Glaucoma. 2008 Aug;17(5):414-21. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31817d2399.
7
[Surgery of primary open angle glaucoma].[原发性开角型青光眼的手术治疗]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2008 Jan;225(1):30-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1027124.
8
Laser suture lysis or releasable sutures after trabeculectomy.小梁切除术后的激光缝线溶解或可拆除缝线
J Glaucoma. 2007 Mar;16(2):240-5. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31802d6ded.
9
The influence of scleral flap position and dimensions on intraocular pressure control in experimental trabeculectomy.巩膜瓣位置和尺寸对实验性小梁切除术中眼压控制的影响。
J Glaucoma. 2006 Aug;15(4):286-90. doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000212241.18842.83.
10
Transconjunctival suture adjustment for initial intraocular pressure control after trabeculectomy.小梁切除术后经结膜缝线调整以初步控制眼压
J Glaucoma. 2005 Dec;14(6):435-40. doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000185421.51715.84.