Raphael-Leff Joan
University College London/Anna Freud Centre.
Psychoanal Study Child. 2009;64:14-53.
This paper attempts to answer the question: Why, when most children play imaginatively, do so few go on to become creators? The author reviews ideas about the interplay between psychic reality, imaginative play, and creativity, elaborated by generations of researchers since Freud first linked these. The transformational process of play is seen to cultivate a multifaceted inner world and greater complexity of the creative capacity. Developmental themes, age-specific preoccupations, and the changing nature of play are considered. The author's original contribution is the concept of "generative identity"-proposing that a young child's self-image is configured through growing distinctions of gender (components of which are redefined as embodiment, representation, desire). Generative identity is further consolidated by negotiating issues of generation (cohort), genesis (origins), generativity (procreation) and "genitive" issues-separateness, arbitrariness, and the irreversibility of birth and death.
为什么大多数孩子在进行富有想象力的玩耍时,最终却很少有人成为创作者?作者回顾了自弗洛伊德首次将心理现实、想象性玩耍和创造力联系起来后,几代研究者所阐述的关于它们之间相互作用的观点。玩耍的转化过程被视为培养一个多面的内心世界和更复杂的创造能力。文中考虑了发展主题、特定年龄的关注点以及玩耍性质的变化。作者的原创贡献是“生成性身份”这一概念——提出幼儿的自我形象是通过日益明显的性别差异构建而成(其组成部分被重新定义为体现、表征、欲望)。通过协商代际(群体)、起源(起源)、生殖力(生育)和“属格”问题——分离、任意性以及出生和死亡的不可逆性,生成性身份得到进一步巩固。