Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, RI 02905, USA.
Compr Psychiatry. 2010 Jul-Aug;51(4):340-6. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2009.09.004. Epub 2009 Dec 21.
Most screening scales for psychiatric disorders consist of a series of questions about the signs and symptoms of the disorder of interest, and to determine whether a patient screens positive, the scores of the individual items are summed and the total score is compared with an empirically derived threshold. A problem with the score summation approach toward case identification on screening scales is that different studies may find that different thresholds are optimal for distinguishing cases from noncases. An alternative approach toward screening is the prototype matching approach, in which respondents are asked to indicate how well their clinical history matches the described prototype. In the present report from the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services project, we compared the symptom summation and prototype matching approaches toward screening for bipolar disorder in a large sample of psychiatric outpatients. Nine hundred sixty-one psychiatric outpatients were interviewed with the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition and completed the Bipolar Spectrum Disorders Scale (BSDS). The BSDS is a unique screening scale consisting of a prototypic description of bipolar disorder. The respondent checks off which items in the prototypic paragraph describes them and also answers a single multiple-choice question at the end of the paragraph asking how well the paragraph describes them. The results of a receiver operating curve analysis found that the score summation and prototype matching approaches toward screening on the BSDS performed equally well. These findings provide preliminary evidence that an alternative approach toward psychiatric screening, the prototype matching approach, is as effective as the traditional score summation method. This raises the intriguing possibility of developing a combined screening scale/educational instrument that can be formatted as a brochure and thus placed in clinicians' waiting rooms, thereby facilitating use of the measure.
大多数精神障碍筛查量表由一系列关于所关注障碍的体征和症状的问题组成,为了确定患者是否筛查阳性,将个体项目的分数相加,并将总分与经验得出的阈值进行比较。筛查量表中用于确定病例的分数相加方法存在一个问题,即不同的研究可能会发现,不同的阈值最适合区分病例和非病例。另一种筛查方法是原型匹配方法,其中要求受访者表明他们的临床病史与描述的原型匹配的程度。在罗德岛改善诊断评估和服务项目的本报告中,我们在大量精神科门诊患者中比较了症状总和和原型匹配方法在筛查双相情感障碍方面的应用。961 名精神科门诊患者接受了《精神障碍诊断与统计手册第四版》的结构临床访谈,并完成了双相谱系障碍量表(BSDS)。BSDS 是一种独特的筛查量表,由双相障碍的典型描述组成。受访者在原型段落中勾选描述他们的项目,并在段落末尾回答一个多项选择题,询问该段落对他们的描述程度。接收者操作曲线分析的结果发现,BSDS 上的分数总和和原型匹配方法在筛查方面的效果相当。这些发现初步证明了一种替代的精神障碍筛查方法,原型匹配方法与传统的分数总和方法一样有效。这提出了一个有趣的可能性,即开发一种组合的筛查量表/教育工具,可以格式化为小册子,然后放置在临床医生的候诊室中,从而便于使用该工具。