Suppr超能文献

心境障碍问卷在精神科门诊环境中的表现。

Performance of the mood disorders questionnaire in a psychiatric outpatient setting.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, RI 02905, USA.

出版信息

Bipolar Disord. 2009 Nov;11(7):759-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2009.00755.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Mood Disorders Questionnaire (MDQ) has been the most widely studied screening questionnaire for bipolar disorder, though few studies have examined its performance in a heterogeneous sample of psychiatric outpatients. In the present report from the Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services (MIDAS) project, we examined the operating characteristics of the MDQ in a large sample of psychiatric outpatients presenting for treatment.

METHODS

A total of 534 psychiatric outpatients were interviewed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV and asked to complete the MDQ. Missing data on the MDQ reduced the number of patients to 480, 10.4% (n = 52) of whom were diagnosed with bipolar disorder.

RESULTS

Based on the scoring guidelines recommended by the developers of the MDQ, the sensitivity of the scale was only 63.5% for the entire group of bipolar patients. The specificity of the scale was 84.8%, and the positive and negative predictive values were 33.7% and 95.0%, respectively. When impairment was not required to define a case on the MDQ, then sensitivity increased to 75.0%, specificity dropped to 78.5%, positive predictive value was 29.8%, and negative predictive value was 96.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large sample of psychiatric outpatients, we found that the MDQ, when scored according to the developers' recommendations, had inadequate sensitivity as a screening measure. After the threshold to determine MDQ caseness was lowered by not requiring moderate or severe impairment, the sensitivity of the scale increased, but specificity decreased, and positive predictive value remained below 30%. These results raise questions regarding the MDQ's utility in routine clinical practice.

摘要

目的

心境障碍问卷(MDQ)是最广泛研究的双相障碍筛查问卷,尽管很少有研究在精神科门诊患者的异质样本中检验其性能。在 Rhode Island 方法改善诊断评估和服务(MIDAS)项目的本报告中,我们在接受治疗的大量精神科门诊患者样本中检查了 MDQ 的操作特征。

方法

共对 534 名精神科门诊患者进行了 DSM-IV 结构临床访谈,并要求他们完成 MDQ。MDQ 的缺失数据将患者人数减少到 480 名,其中 10.4%(n=52)被诊断为双相障碍。

结果

根据 MDQ 开发者推荐的评分指南,该量表对整个双相患者组的敏感性仅为 63.5%。该量表的特异性为 84.8%,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 33.7%和 95.0%。当 MDQ 不要求损伤来定义病例时,敏感性增加到 75.0%,特异性降低到 78.5%,阳性预测值为 29.8%,阴性预测值为 96.3%。

结论

在大量精神科门诊患者中,我们发现 MDQ 按照开发者的建议评分时,作为筛查措施的敏感性不足。在将确定 MDQ 病例的阈值降低到不要求中度或重度损伤后,该量表的敏感性增加,但特异性降低,阳性预测值仍低于 30%。这些结果引发了对 MDQ 在常规临床实践中的实用性的质疑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验