Suppr超能文献

使用微计算机断层扫描评估两种新型玻璃离子体基密封剂材料的边缘渗漏。

Marginal leakage of two newer glass-ionomer-based sealant materials assessed using micro-CT.

机构信息

Key Laboratory for Oral Biomedical Engineering, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Luoyu Road 237, 430079 Wuhan, Hubei, PR China.

出版信息

J Dent. 2010 Sep;38(9):731-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.018. Epub 2010 May 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To test newer glass-ionomer-based materials as sealant materials. One glass-ionomer sealant was light-cured to obtain an early setting reaction. The null-hypothesis tested was: there is no difference in marginal leakage of sealants produced with high-viscosity glass-ionomer, with and without energy supplied, and that of glass-carbomer, in comparison with resin composite sealants in vitro.

METHODS

Materials used were Clinpro, Ketac Molar Easymix and Glass-Carbomer. Sealants were placed in the occlusal surface of 89 molar teeth, thermocycled for 5000 cycles and evaluated using micro-CT for silver nitrate penetration depth at the enamel-sealant interface by two trained evaluators. Data were analysed, using ANOVA and Scheffe's test.

RESULTS

Glass-carbomer sealants showed one or more 'fracture lines' in the material and at the enamel-material interface, filled with a kind of transparent, but not black coloured, material. High-viscosity glass-ionomer sealants with and without energy supplied had statistically significantly lower mean marginal leakage scores than sealants produced by composite resin (p<0.01). No marginal leakage was found in the high-viscosity glass-ionomer group without energy supplied.

CONCLUSIONS

The high-viscosity glass-ionomer (Ketac Molar Easymix) sealants had lower marginal leakage than resin composite sealants, and should be tested in vivo. Glass-carbomer sealants were non-interpretable.

摘要

目的

测试新型玻璃离子体基材料作为密封剂材料。一种玻璃离子体密封剂经光固化以获得早期凝固反应。测试的零假设是:在体外,高粘度玻璃离子体与能量供应的和没有能量供应的密封剂与玻璃碳聚合物密封剂相比,其边缘渗漏没有差异,且与树脂复合密封剂相比也没有差异。

方法

使用 Clinpro、Ketac Molar Easymix 和 Glass-Carbomer 材料。将密封剂放置在 89 颗磨牙的咬合面,经 5000 次热循环后,由两名经过培训的评估员使用微 CT 评估硝酸银渗透深度在釉质-密封剂界面处的情况。使用 ANOVA 和 Scheffe 检验分析数据。

结果

玻璃碳聚合物密封剂在材料和釉质-材料界面处显示出一个或多个“断裂线”,填充有一种透明但不是黑色的物质。有能量供应的和没有能量供应的高粘度玻璃离子体密封剂的平均边缘渗漏评分明显低于复合树脂制成的密封剂(p<0.01)。在没有能量供应的高粘度玻璃离子体组中没有发现边缘渗漏。

结论

高粘度玻璃离子体(Ketac Molar Easymix)密封剂的边缘渗漏低于树脂复合密封剂,应该进行体内测试。玻璃碳聚合物密封剂无法解释。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验