Alvarenga Fábio Augusto de Santi, Pinelli Camila, Loffredo Leonor de Castro Monteiro
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Araraquara School of Dentistry, UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Community Dentistry, Araraquara School of Dentistry, UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eur J Dent. 2015 Jan-Mar;9(1):1-5. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.149628.
The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of visual and digital methods to assess marginal microleakage in vitro.
Typical Class V preparations were made in bovine teeth and filled with composite resin. After dye penetration (0.5% basic fuchsin), teeth were sectioned and the 53 obtained fragments were assessed according to visual (stereomicroscope) and digital methods (Image Tool Software(®)-ITS) (University of Texas Health Science Center-San Antonio Dental School, USA). Two calibrated examiners (A and B) evaluated dye penetration, by means of a stereomicroscope with ×20 magnification (scores), and by the ITS (millimeters). The intra- and inter-examiner agreement was estimated according to Kappa statistics (κ), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ρ).
In relation to the visual method, the intra-examiner agreement was almost perfect (κA = 0.87) and substantial (κB = 0.76), respectively to the examiner A and B. The inter-examiner agreement showed an almost perfect reliability (κ = 0.84). For the digital method, the intra-examiner agreement was almost perfect for both examiners and equal to ρ = 0.99, and so was the inter-examiner agreement value.
Visual (stereomicroscope) and digital methods (ITS) showed high levels of intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility when marginal microleakage was assessed.
本研究旨在调查体外评估边缘微渗漏的视觉和数字方法的可靠性。
在牛牙上制备典型的V类洞型,并用复合树脂充填。在染料渗透(0.5%碱性品红)后,将牙齿切片,对获得的53个碎片根据视觉方法(体视显微镜)和数字方法(图像工具软件(®)-ITS)(美国德克萨斯大学健康科学中心-圣安东尼奥牙科学院)进行评估。两名经过校准的检查者(A和B)通过放大20倍的体视显微镜(评分)和ITS(毫米)评估染料渗透情况。根据kappa统计量(κ)和组内相关系数(ρ)估计检查者内和检查者间的一致性。
关于视觉方法,检查者A和B的检查者内一致性分别几乎为完美(κA = 0.87)和高度一致(κB = 0.76)。检查者间一致性显示出几乎完美的可靠性(κ = 0.84)。对于数字方法,两名检查者的检查者内一致性均几乎为完美,且等于ρ = 0.99,检查者间一致性值也是如此。
在评估边缘微渗漏时,视觉方法(体视显微镜)和数字方法(ITS)显示出检查者内和检查者间的高重复性。