Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care Medicine, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Emerg Med J. 2011 Jun;28(6):483-5. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.090464. Epub 2010 Jun 26.
Prehospital induction of therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest may require temperature monitoring in the field. Tympanic temperature is non-invasive and frequently used in clinical practice. Nevertheless, it has not yet been evaluated in patients undergoing mild therapeutic hypothermia (MTH). Therefore, a prospective observational study was conducted comparing three different sites of temperature monitoring during therapeutic hypothermia.
Ten consecutive patients admitted to our medical intensive care unit after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were included in this study. During MTH, tympanic temperature was measured using a digital thermometer. Simultaneously, oesophageal and bladder temperatures were recorded in a total of 558 single measurements.
Compared with oesophageal temperature, bladder temperature had a bias of 0.019°C (limits of agreement ± 0.61°C (2SD)), and tympanic measurement had a bias of 0.021°C (± 0.80°C). Correlation analysis revealed a high relationship for tympanic versus oesophageal temperature (r = 0.95, p < 0.0001) and also for tympanic versus bladder temperature (r = 0.96, p < 0.0001).
That tympanic temperature accurately indicates both oesophageal and bladder temperatures with a very small discrepancy in patients undergoing MTH after cardiac arrest is demonstrated in this study. Although our results were obtained in the hospital setting, these findings may be relevant for the prehospital application of therapeutic hypothermia as well. In this case, tympanic temperature may provide an easy and non-invasive method for temperature monitoring.
心脏骤停后,在院前进行治疗性低温诱导可能需要在现场进行体温监测。鼓室温度是非侵入性的,并且在临床实践中经常使用。然而,它尚未在接受轻度治疗性低温(MTH)的患者中进行评估。因此,进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,比较了在治疗性低温期间监测三个不同部位的温度。
本研究纳入了 10 例连续因院外心脏骤停后入住我们内科重症监护病房的患者。在 MTH 期间,使用数字温度计测量鼓室温度。同时,在总共 558 次单次测量中记录了食管和膀胱温度。
与食管温度相比,膀胱温度的偏差为 0.019°C(一致性界限±0.61°C(2SD)),鼓室测量的偏差为 0.021°C(±0.80°C)。相关分析显示,鼓室与食管温度之间存在高度相关性(r = 0.95,p < 0.0001),与鼓室与膀胱温度之间也存在高度相关性(r = 0.96,p < 0.0001)。
本研究表明,在心脏骤停后接受 MTH 的患者中,鼓室温度可准确指示食管和膀胱温度,差异很小。尽管我们的结果是在医院环境中获得的,但这些发现可能与治疗性低温的院前应用相关。在这种情况下,鼓室温度可能为体温监测提供一种简单、非侵入性的方法。