Suppr超能文献

全身低频振动对青年男性纵跳能力的急性影响。

The acute effect of whole-body low-frequency vibration on countermovement vertical jump performance in college-aged men.

机构信息

Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi, USA.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Dec;24(12):3433-42. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c1ff7e.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the acute effects of whole-body vibration on jump performance. A total of 21 college-aged men, 18-30 years, recreationally resistance trained, were exposed to a total of 4 different acute whole-body low-frequency vibration (WBLFV) protocols (conditions 1-4), performing 2 protocols per testing session in random order. Exposures were all performed using high-amplitude (peak-peak 4-6 mm) and either 30 or 50 Hz for 30 continuous seconds, or 3 exposures of 10 seconds with 1 minute between exposures. Three countermovement vertical jumps (CMVJs) were performed before vibration (testing phase 1 or Tp1 and J1 the highest of 3 attempts) and at 3 separate time points postvibration (Tp2-4). Jump height (cm), peak power (Pmax), peak power per kilogram of body mass (Pmax kg), mean power (Pav), and mean velocity (Vav) were recorded. Repeated measures analysis of variance and analysis of covariance revealed no significant condition (C) or jump (J) differences for CMVJ height (cm) (p > 0.05). Analysis of percent change (Δ%) for CMVJ height (cm) revealed a significant Condition × Jump interaction, C4, J3 > C1, J3 (p = 0.009, mean diff 4.12%). Analysis of Pmax and Pmax kg revealed no significant Condition, Jump, or Condition × Jump interaction for the raw data or percent change (p > 0.05). Analysis of Pav (W) revealed significant differences for Condition (p = 0.031) but not for Jump (p = 0.226). There was a strong trend toward significance for Condition × Jump interaction (p = 0.059). C4 > C3 (p = 0.043, mean diff 23.78 W) and C1 (p = 0.038, mean diff 32.03 W). Analysis of Vav (m·s) revealed no significant main effects for Condition or Jump (p > 0.05) but found a significant Condition × Jump interaction (p = 0.007). C4, J6 > C2, J6 (p = 0.014, mean diff 0.05 m·s), and C3, J6 (p = 0.020, 0.05 m·s). WBLFV applied intermittently using 50 Hz appears to be more effective than other protocols using 30 and 50 Hz in facilitating select measures of CMVJ performance over a 17-minute time period post-WBLFV exposure. Practical manipulation of such a WBLFV "dose" may be beneficial to strength and conditioning practitioners wanting to acutely facilitate CMVJ and slow stretch shortening cycle performance while minimizing exposure time.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨全身振动对跳跃表现的急性影响。共有 21 名年龄在 18-30 岁之间、有规律进行抗阻训练的大学生参与了总共 4 种不同的全身低频振动(WBLFV)方案(条件 1-4),在随机顺序下,每种方案在每个测试阶段进行 2 次。所有暴露均采用高振幅(峰峰值 4-6mm)和 30 或 50Hz,持续 30 秒,或 3 次 10 秒的暴露,每次之间间隔 1 分钟。在振动前(测试阶段 1 或 Tp1,3 次尝试中最高的 J1)和振动后 3 个不同时间点(Tp2-4)进行了 3 次反跳垂直跳跃(CMVJ)。记录了跳跃高度(cm)、峰值功率(Pmax)、峰值功率每公斤体重(Pmaxkg)、平均功率(Pav)和平均速度(Vav)。重复测量方差分析和协方差分析显示,CMVJ 高度(cm)的条件(C)或跳跃(J)差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。CMVJ 高度(cm)的百分比变化(Δ%)分析显示,条件×跳跃交互作用 C4、J3>C1、J3 有统计学意义(p=0.009,平均差异 4.12%)。对原始数据或百分比变化(p>0.05)的 Pmax 和 Pmaxkg 进行分析,未发现条件、跳跃或条件×跳跃交互作用有统计学意义。对 Pav(W)的分析显示,条件(p=0.031)有显著差异,但跳跃(p=0.226)无显著差异。条件×跳跃交互作用有显著趋势(p=0.059)。C4>C3(p=0.043,平均差异 23.78W)和 C1(p=0.038,平均差异 32.03W)。对 Vav(m·s)的分析显示,条件或跳跃的主要效应无统计学意义(p>0.05),但发现条件×跳跃交互作用有统计学意义(p=0.007)。C4、J6>C2、J6(p=0.014,平均差异 0.05m·s)和 C3、J6(p=0.020,0.05m·s)。间歇性应用 50Hz 的全身低强度振动似乎比其他使用 30Hz 和 50Hz 的方案更有效,在全身低强度振动暴露后 17 分钟内更有利于选择 CMVJ 表现的测量。对这种全身低强度振动“剂量”的实际操作可能对希望在急性促进 CMVJ 和减缓伸展缩短周期表现的力量和调节从业者有益,同时最大限度地减少暴露时间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验