Lamont Hugh S, Cramer Joel T, Bemben Debra A, Shehab Randa L, Anderson Mark A, Bemben Michael G
Neuromuscular Research Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.
J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Nov;22(6):1882-93. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181821a1a.
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of a 6-week, periodized squat training program, with or without whole-body low-frequency vibration (WBLFV), on jump performance. Males ranged in age from 20 to 30 years and were randomized into groups that did squat training with (SQTV, n = 13) or without (SQT, n = 11) vibration, or a control group (CG, n = 6). Measures of jump height (cm), peak power (Pmax), Pmax per kilogram of body mass (Pmax/kg), and mean power were recorded during 30-cm depth jumps and 20-kg squat jumps at weeks 1 (pretraining), 3 (midtraining), and 7 (posttraining). No significant group differences were seen for 30-cm depth jump height between weeks 1 and 7 (p > 0.05). Trial three (W7) measures were greater than those for trial two (W3) and trial one (W1) (p < 0.05). Significant group differences were seen for 20-kg squat jump height, with SQTV > SQT between weeks 1 and 7 (p < 0.05). Significant trial differences were seen, with W7 > W3 > W1 (p < 0.05) as well as for 30-cm depth jump Pmax percent change (W7 > W3 and W1 p < 0.05)). A significant trial effect was seen for 20-kg squat jump Pmax (W7 > W1, p < 0.05) and 20-kg squat jump Pmax/kg percent change (W7 > W3 > W1, p < 0.05). The addition of vibration to SQTV seemed to facilitate Pmax and mean power adaptation for depth jumps and Pmax for squat jumps, although not significantly (p > 0.05). Stretch reflex potentiation and increased motor unit synchronization and firing rates may account for the trends seen. Baseline squat strength, resistance training experience, and amplitude, frequency, and duration of application of WBLFV seem to be important factors that need to be controlled for.
本研究的目的是考察为期6周的、有或无全身低频振动(WBLFV)的周期化深蹲训练计划对跳跃性能的影响。男性年龄在20至30岁之间,被随机分为三组,分别是进行带振动的深蹲训练组(SQTV,n = 13)、进行不带振动的深蹲训练组(SQT,n = 11)以及对照组(CG,n = 6)。在第1周(训练前)、第3周(训练中期)和第7周(训练后),对30厘米深度跳跃和20千克深蹲跳跃过程中的跳跃高度(厘米)、峰值功率(Pmax)、每千克体重的峰值功率(Pmax/kg)以及平均功率进行了记录。第1周和第7周之间,30厘米深度跳跃高度在组间无显著差异(p > 0.05)。第3次测试(W7)的测量值大于第2次测试(W3)和第1次测试(W1)(p < 0.05)。对于20千克深蹲跳跃高度,在第1周和第7周组间存在显著差异,SQTV组大于SQT组(p < 0.05)。在测试间也存在显著差异,W7 > W3 > W1(p < 0.05),30厘米深度跳跃的Pmax百分比变化情况也是如此(W7 > W3和W1,p < 0.05)。对于20千克深蹲跳跃的Pmax(W7 > W1,p < 0.05)和20千克深蹲跳跃的Pmax/kg百分比变化(W7 > W3 > W1,p < 0.05),存在显著的测试效应。给SQTV组增加振动似乎有助于深度跳跃的Pmax和平均功率适应以及深蹲跳跃的Pmax适应,尽管差异不显著(p > 0.05)。牵张反射增强以及运动单位同步性和放电频率增加可能是观察到这些趋势的原因。基线深蹲力量、阻力训练经验以及WBLFV的应用幅度、频率和持续时间似乎是需要控制的重要因素。