Suppr超能文献

长度是否适合作为描述肺泡毛细血管的指标?对人体肺部的批判性评估。

Is length an appropriate estimator to characterize pulmonary alveolar capillaries? A critical evaluation in the human lung.

机构信息

Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

出版信息

Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2010 Jul;293(7):1270-5. doi: 10.1002/ar.21158.

Abstract

Stereological estimations of total capillary length have been used to characterize changes in the alveolar capillary network (ACN) during developmental processes or pathophysiological conditions. Here, we analyzed whether length estimations are appropriate to describe the 3D nature of the ACN. Semi-thin sections of five human lungs, previously investigated by Gehr et al. (Respir Physiol 1978; 32:121-140), were used to estimate alveolar capillary length using a "design-based" or a "model-based" stereological approach. The design-based approach involves counting of capillary profiles related to a defined area of the reference space. The model-based approach bases on the assumption that capillaries are round tubes and length was calculated from capillary volume and surface area. The model-based approach provided a mean of 6,950 km (SD: 3,108 km) for total capillary length, the design-based approach resulted in a mean of 2,746 km (SD: 722 km). Because of the geometry of the ACN both approaches carry an unpredictable bias. The bias incurred by the design-based approach is proportional to the ratio between radius and length of the capillary segments in the ACN, the number of branching points and the winding of the capillaries. The model-based approach is biased because of the real noncylindrical shape of capillaries and the network structure. In conclusion, the estimation of the total length of capillaries in the ACN cannot be recommended as the geometry of the ACN does not fulfill the requirements for stereological length estimation. Until new methods are being developed, the unbiased estimates of capillary volume, and surface area should be preferred.

摘要

体视学估计的毛细血管总长度已被用于描述肺泡毛细血管网络 (ACN) 在发育过程或病理生理条件下的变化。在这里,我们分析了长度估计是否适合描述 ACN 的 3D 性质。使用 Gehr 等人先前研究过的五个人肺的半薄切片(Respir Physiol 1978; 32:121-140),使用“基于设计”或“基于模型”的体视学法来估计肺泡毛细血管长度。基于设计的方法涉及与参考空间的定义区域相关的毛细血管轮廓的计数。基于模型的方法基于这样的假设,即毛细血管是圆形管,长度是从毛细血管体积和表面积计算得出的。基于模型的方法提供了总毛细血管长度的平均值为 6950 公里(SD:3108 公里),基于设计的方法得出的平均值为 2746 公里(SD:722 公里)。由于 ACN 的几何形状,这两种方法都存在不可预测的偏差。基于设计的方法产生的偏差与 ACN 中毛细血管段的半径与长度之比、分支点的数量和毛细血管的缠绕成正比。基于模型的方法存在偏差,因为毛细血管的真实非圆柱形状和网络结构。总之,不建议使用 ACN 中毛细血管总长度的估计,因为 ACN 的几何形状不符合体视学长度估计的要求。在新方法得到开发之前,应优先选择毛细血管体积和表面积的无偏估计。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验