Division of Surgical Intensive Care, University Hospital of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, Zurich 8091, Switzerland.
Crit Care. 2010;14(3):R123. doi: 10.1186/cc9086. Epub 2010 Jun 28.
Despite large experience in the management of severe burn injury, there are still controversies regarding the best type of fluid resuscitation, especially during the first 24 hours after the trauma. Therefore, our study addressed the question whether hyperoncotic hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 200/0.5 (10%) administered in combination with crystalloids within the first 24 hours after injury is as effective as 'crystalloids only' in severe burn injury patients.
30 consecutive patients were enrolled to this prospective interventional open label study and assigned either to a traditional 'crystalloids only' or to a 'HES 200/0.5 (10%)' volume resuscitation protocol. Total amount of fluid administration, complications such as pulmonary failure, abdominal compartment syndrome, sepsis, renal failure and overall mortality were assessed. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed for binary outcomes and adjustment for potential confounders was done in the multivariate regression models. For continuous outcome parameters multiple linear regression analysis was used.
Group differences between patients receiving crystalloids only or HES 200/0.5 (10%) were not statistically significant. However, a large effect towards increased overall mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 7.12; P = 0.16) in the HES 200/0.5 (10%) group as compared to the crystalloids only group (43.8% versus 14.3%) was present. Similarly, the incidence of renal failure was 25.0% in the HES 200/0.5 (10%) group versus 7.1% in the crystalloid only group (adjusted hazard ratio 6.16; P = 0.42).
This small study indicates that the application of hyperoncotic HES 200/0.5 (10%) within the first 24 hours after severe burn injury may be associated with fatal outcome and should therefore be used with caution.
NCT01120730.
尽管在严重烧伤的治疗方面拥有丰富的经验,但在创伤后 24 小时内,最佳的液体复苏类型仍存在争议。因此,我们的研究旨在探讨在严重烧伤患者中,伤后 24 小时内联合应用高渗羟乙基淀粉(HES)200/0.5(10%)与单纯晶体液相比是否同样有效。
本前瞻性干预性开放标签研究纳入了 30 例连续患者,并将其分为传统的“单纯晶体液”或“HES 200/0.5(10%)”容量复苏方案组。评估总输液量、肺衰竭、腹腔间隔室综合征、脓毒症、肾衰竭和总体死亡率等并发症。对二项结局采用 Cox 比例风险回归分析,对多变量回归模型进行潜在混杂因素的调整。对连续结局参数采用多元线性回归分析。
接受单纯晶体液或 HES 200/0.5(10%)的患者之间的组间差异无统计学意义。然而,与单纯晶体液组相比,HES 200/0.5(10%)组的总体死亡率(调整后的危险比 7.12;P=0.16)显著升高。同样,HES 200/0.5(10%)组的肾衰竭发生率为 25.0%,而单纯晶体液组为 7.1%(调整后的危险比 6.16;P=0.42)。
本小样本研究表明,在严重烧伤后 24 小时内应用高渗 HES 200/0.5(10%)可能与致命结局相关,因此应谨慎使用。
NCT01120730。