Suppr超能文献

晶体液与胶体液:在第十二回合被淘汰?

Crystalloids vs. colloids: KO at the twelfth round?

作者信息

Phillips Dennis P, Kaynar A Murat, Kellum John A, Gomez Hernando

出版信息

Crit Care. 2013 May 29;17(3):319. doi: 10.1186/cc12708.

Abstract

CITATION

Myburgh JA, Finfer S, Bellomo R, Billot L, Cass A, Gattas D, Glass P, Lipman J, Liu B, McArthur C, McGuinness S, Rajbhandari D, Taylor CB, Webb SA; CHEST Investigators; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group: Hydroxyethyl starch or saline for fluid resuscitation in intensive care. N Engl J Med 2012, 367:1901-1911.

BACKGROUND

The safety and efficacy of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) for fluid resuscitation have not been fully evaluated, and adverse effects of HES on survival and renal function have been reported.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 7,000 patients who had been admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 6% HES with a molecular weight of 130 kDa and a molar substitution ratio of 0.4 (130/0.4, Voluven; Fresenius Kabi AG, Bad Homburg vor der Höhe, Germany) in 0.9% sodium chloride or 0.9% sodium chloride (saline) for all fluid resuscitation until ICU discharge, death, or 90 days after randomization. The primary outcome was death within 90 days. Secondary outcomes included acute kidney injury and failure and treatment with renal replacement therapy.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a large-scale randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 6% HES(130/0.4) in 0.9% saline as compared with 0.9% saline alone for fluid resuscitation in a heterogeneous population of adult patients in the ICU.

DESIGN

The Crystalloid versus Hydroxyethyl Starch Trial (CHEST) was an investigator-initiated, multicenter,prospective, blinded, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

The study was set at 32 hospitals in Australia and New Zealand.

SUBJECTS

The subjects were adult patients (>18 years) who were admitted to the ICU and who required intravenous fluid above maintenance requirements determined by the treating clinician and supported by at least one objective physiological criterion. Patients were excluded if they received more than 1 L of 6% HES within 24 hours of screening or had one of the following:dialysis-dependent or impending dialysis renal failure,computed tomography evidence of non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) or severe traumatic ICH, creatinine of more than 3.9 mg/dL or urine output of less than 10 mL/hour for 12 hours, sodium of more than 160 meq/L, or chloride of more than 130 meq/L. Also excluded were females of childbearing age (unless proven not to be pregnant) and patients who had post-cardiac surgery status, liver transplant, or burns and those whose death was judged to be imminent or whose underlying disease process indicated a life expectancy of less than 90 days.

INTERVENTION

If fluid was deemed necessary by the treating clinician by the parameters described above, the patient received ‘study’ fluid with identical packaging and appearance. The fluid was either 6% HES (130/0.4) in saline (Voluven) or 0.9% saline.

OUTCOMES

Th e primary outcome was death within 90 days. Secondary outcomes were acute kidney injury (AKI) and failure and treatment with renal replacement therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 597 (18.0%) of 3,315 patients in the HES group and 566 (17.0%) of 3,336 in the saline group died (relative risk (RR) in the HES group 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96 to 1.18; P=0.26). There was no significant difference in mortality in six predefined subgroups. AKI--defined by RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, and End-stage kidney disease) criteria--occurred in few patients receiving HES (34.6%) compared with saline (38%) (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.97). However, renal replacement therapy was used in 235 (7.0%) of 3,352 patients in the HES group and 196 (5.8%) of 3,375 in the saline group (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.45; P=0.04). HES was significantly associated with more adverse events (5.3% versus 2.8%; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients in the ICU, there was no significant difference in 90-day mortality between patients resuscitated with 6% HES (130/0.4) or saline. However, despite a lower overall rate of AKI, more patients who received resuscitation with HES were given renal replacement therapy. (The study was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia; the Ministry of Health, New South Wales Government, Australia; and Fresenius Kabi; and by a Practitioner Fellowship from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (to Drs Myburgh and Bellomo), by a Principal Research Fellowship from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (to Dr Cass), and by a Practitioner Fellowship from the Medical Research Foundation of the Royal Perth Hospital (to Dr Webb); CHEST ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00935168.).

摘要

引用文献

Myburgh JA, Finfer S, Bellomo R, Billot L, Cass A, Gattas D, Glass P, Lipman J, Liu B, McArthur C, McGuinness S, Rajbhandari D, Taylor CB, Webb SA; CHEST研究团队; 澳大利亚和新西兰重症监护协会临床试验组:羟乙基淀粉或生理盐水用于重症监护中的液体复苏。《新英格兰医学杂志》2012年,367卷:1901 - 1911页。

背景

羟乙基淀粉(HES)用于液体复苏的安全性和有效性尚未得到充分评估,且已有关于HES对生存和肾功能的不良反应的报道。

方法

我们将7000例入住重症监护病房(ICU)的患者按1:1比例随机分组,一组接受分子量为130 kDa、摩尔取代率为0.4的6% HES(130/0.4,万汶;费森尤斯卡比公司,德国巴特洪堡)溶于0.9%氯化钠溶液中,另一组接受0.9%氯化钠溶液(生理盐水)进行所有液体复苏,直至患者从ICU出院、死亡或随机分组后90天。主要结局为90天内死亡。次要结局包括急性肾损伤和肾衰竭以及接受肾脏替代治疗。

目的

我们进行了一项大规模随机对照试验,以评估在ICU成年患者的异质性群体中,6% HES(130/0.4)溶于0.9%生理盐水中与单纯0.9%生理盐水用于液体复苏的安全性和有效性。

设计

晶体液与羟乙基淀粉试验(CHEST)是一项由研究者发起的、多中心、前瞻性、盲法、平行组、随机对照试验。

地点

该研究在澳大利亚和新西兰的32家医院开展。

研究对象

研究对象为入住ICU的成年患者(>18岁),这些患者需要静脉输注超过维持所需量的液体,由主治医生根据至少一项客观生理标准确定。如果患者在筛查后24小时内接受了超过1 L的6% HES,或存在以下情况之一,则被排除:依赖透析或即将进行透析的肾衰竭、计算机断层扫描显示非创伤性颅内出血(ICH)或严重创伤性ICH、肌酐超过3.9 mg/dL或尿量低于10 mL/小时持续12小时、钠超过160 meq/L或氯超过130 meq/L。育龄期女性(除非证实未怀孕)以及有心脏手术后状态、肝移植、烧伤的患者,以及那些被判定即将死亡或其基础疾病进程表明预期寿命小于90天的患者也被排除。

干预措施

如果主治医生根据上述参数认为有必要进行补液,患者将接受包装和外观相同的“研究”液体。液体要么是6% HES(130/0.4)溶于生理盐水中(万汶),要么是0.9%生理盐水。

结局指标

主要结局为90天内死亡。次要结局为急性肾损伤(AKI)和肾衰竭以及接受肾脏替代治疗。

结果

HES组3315例患者中有597例(18.0%)死亡,生理盐水组3336例患者中有566例(17.0%)死亡(HES组相对风险(RR)为1.06,95%置信区间(CI)为0.96至(此处原文有误,应为1.18);P = 0.26)。在六个预先定义的亚组中,死亡率无显著差异。根据RIFLE(风险、损伤、衰竭、丧失和终末期肾病)标准定义的AKI,接受HES治疗的患者中发生率较低(34.6%),低于接受生理盐水治疗的患者(38%)(RR 0.91,95% CI 0.85至0.97)。然而,HES组3352例患者中有235例(7.0%)接受了肾脏替代治疗,生理盐水组3375例患者中有196例(5.8%)接受了肾脏替代治疗(RR 1.21,95% CI 1.00至1.45;P = 0.04)。HES与更多不良事件显著相关(5.3%对2.8%;P < 0.001)。

结论

在ICU患者中,接受6% HES(130/0.4)或生理盐水复苏的患者90天死亡率无显著差异。然而,尽管接受HES复苏的患者总体AKI发生率较低,但接受HES复苏的更多患者接受了肾脏替代治疗。(该研究由澳大利亚国家卫生与医学研究委员会、澳大利亚新南威尔士州政府卫生部和费森尤斯卡比公司资助;并由澳大利亚国家卫生与医学研究委员会授予的从业者奖学金(授予Myburgh博士和Bellomo博士)、澳大利亚国家卫生与医学研究委员会授予的首席研究奖学金(授予Cass博士)以及珀斯皇家医院医学研究基金会授予的从业者奖学金(授予Webb博士)资助;CHEST临床试验注册号NCT00935168。)

相似文献

2

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Colloid solutions for fluid resuscitation.用于液体复苏的胶体溶液。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23(1):CD001319. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001319.pub2.
9
A systematic review of the comparative safety of colloids.胶体相对安全性的系统评价。
Arch Surg. 2004 May;139(5):552-63. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.5.552.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验