• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Carotid artery stenting: experience of a single institute in china.颈动脉支架置入术:中国一家机构的经验
Interv Neuroradiol. 2005 Sep 30;11(3):205-12. doi: 10.1177/159101990501100302. Epub 2005 Oct 26.
2
Appropriateness of learning curve for carotid artery stenting: an analysis of periprocedural complications.颈动脉支架置入术学习曲线的适宜性:围手术期并发症分析
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Dec;44(6):1205-11; discussion 1211-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.08.027. Epub 2006 Oct 20.
3
Carotid angioplasty and stenting: treatment of postcarotid endarterectomy restenosis is at least as safe as primary stenosis treatment.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术:治疗颈动脉内膜切除术后再狭窄至少与治疗原发性狭窄一样安全。
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Oct;50(4):755-761.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.04.060. Epub 2009 Jul 3.
4
Carotid angioplasty and stent placement: comparison of transcranial Doppler US data and clinical outcome with and without filtering cerebral protection devices in 509 patients.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术:509例患者使用和不使用脑保护装置时经颅多普勒超声数据与临床结果的比较
Radiology. 2005 Feb;234(2):493-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2342040119. Epub 2004 Dec 22.
5
Carotid Artery Stenting Without Embolic Protection Device: A Single-Center Experience.颈动脉支架置入术无栓塞保护装置:单中心经验。
J Endovasc Ther. 2019 Feb;26(1):121-127. doi: 10.1177/1526602818816656. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
6
Impact of residual stenosis on clinical outcomes when performing carotid artery stenting without postdilation.在未进行后扩张的情况下进行颈动脉支架置入术时残余狭窄对临床结局的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Jan;77(1):182-190. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.07.021. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
7
Double Filtration During Carotid Artery Stenting Using a Novel Post-Dilation Balloon With Integrated Embolic Protection.双重过滤颈动脉支架置入术:一种新型后置扩张球囊联合内置栓塞保护装置
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 25;12(4):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.11.039.
8
Carotid artery stenting in a vascular surgery practice.血管外科实践中的颈动脉支架置入术。
J Vasc Surg. 2002 Mar;35(3):430-4. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.121209.
9
Carotid stenting without use of balloon angioplasty and distal protection devices: preliminary experience in 100 cases.不使用球囊血管成形术和远端保护装置的颈动脉支架置入术:100例初步经验。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Aug;28(7):1378-83. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0543.
10
Initial experience with cerebral protection devices to prevent embolization during carotid artery stenting.颈动脉支架置入术中使用脑保护装置预防栓塞的初步经验。
J Vasc Surg. 2002 Dec;36(6):1175-85. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.129488.

引用本文的文献

1
Selective-versus-Standard Poststent Dilation for Carotid Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.颈动脉疾病支架置入术后选择性扩张与标准扩张的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 May;38(5):999-1005. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5103. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
2
Demographic and Technical Risk Factors of 30-Day Stroke, Myocardial Infarction, and/or Death in Standard- and High-Risk Patients Who Underwent Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting.接受颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术的标准风险和高风险患者发生30天卒中、心肌梗死及/或死亡的人口统计学和技术风险因素
Interv Neurol. 2015 Jul;3(3-4):165-73. doi: 10.1159/000430923.
3
Carotid Stenting without Angioplasty and without Protection: The Advantages of a Less Invasive Procedure.无血管成形术及无保护装置的颈动脉支架置入术:一种微创治疗方法的优势
Interv Neuroradiol. 2008 Jun 30;14(2):153-63. doi: 10.1177/159101990801400206.

本文引用的文献

1
Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients.高危患者中颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的比较
N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 7;351(15):1493-501. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040127.
2
Management of ruptures complicating angioplasty and stenting of supraaortic arteries: report of two cases and a review of the literature.主动脉弓上动脉血管成形术和支架置入术并发破裂的处理:两例报告及文献复习
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003 Nov-Dec;24(10):2057-61.
3
Editorial comment--Carotid artery stenting with or without protection devices? Strong opinions, poor evidence!编者按——颈动脉支架置入术:使用或不使用保护装置?观点鲜明,证据不足!
Stroke. 2003 Aug;34(8):1941-3. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000080938.80364.75. Epub 2003 Jul 3.
4
Protected carotid stenting: clinical advantages and complications of embolic protection devices in 442 consecutive patients.颈动脉支架置入术的保护措施:442例连续患者中栓子保护装置的临床优势及并发症
Stroke. 2003 Aug;34(8):1936-41. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000081000.23561.61. Epub 2003 Jul 3.
5
The causes and risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic internal-carotid-artery stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators.无症状性颈内动脉狭窄患者中风的病因及风险。北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验协作组。
N Engl J Med. 2000 Jun 8;342(23):1693-700. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200006083422302.
6
Asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis defined by ultrasound and the risk of subsequent stroke in the elderly. The Cardiovascular Health Study.超声定义的无症状性颈内动脉狭窄与老年人随后发生卒中的风险。心血管健康研究。
Stroke. 1998 Nov;29(11):2371-6. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.11.2371.
7
The natural history of asymptomatic moderate internal carotid artery stenosis by duplex ultrasound.经双功超声检查的无症状性中度颈内动脉狭窄的自然病史。
Vasc Med. 1998;3(2):101-8. doi: 10.1177/1358836X9800300203.
8
Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association.颈动脉内膜切除术指南:美国心脏协会中风委员会特别写作小组为医疗专业人员发布的声明
Stroke. 1998 Feb;29(2):554-62. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.2.554.
9
Efficacy of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group.无症状性颈动脉狭窄行颈动脉内膜切除术的疗效。退伍军人事务部协作研究组。
N Engl J Med. 1993 Jan 28;328(4):221-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199301283280401.
10
Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study.无症状性颈动脉狭窄的动脉内膜切除术。无症状性颈动脉粥样硬化研究执行委员会。
JAMA. 1995 May 10;273(18):1421-8.

颈动脉支架置入术:中国一家机构的经验

Carotid artery stenting: experience of a single institute in china.

作者信息

Li S M, Li D, Ling F, Miao Z R, Wang M L

机构信息

From the Interventional Center, Xuan-Wu Hospital, the Capital University of Medical Science, Beijing; China -

出版信息

Interv Neuroradiol. 2005 Sep 30;11(3):205-12. doi: 10.1177/159101990501100302. Epub 2005 Oct 26.

DOI:10.1177/159101990501100302
PMID:20584476
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3404774/
Abstract

Concern regarding the safety of Carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) exists because of the risk of cerebral embolization during the procedure. The purpose of this article is to discuss that technology modification may improve the outcomes of this procedure. Between October 1997 and October 2004, 439 consecutive patients with 478 stenotic carotid arteries were treated. 284 vessels were stented without the use of embolic protection devices and 194 vessels with protection. Among cases not using protection device, 201 arteries were stented with predilation alone, 63 with postdilation alone, six with both pre- and post-dilation, two with neither and twelve were stented with balloon expandable stents. The technical success of 100%.The combined stroke and death rate during the procedure and the 30-day follow-up at 30 days was 1.67% overall. Three (0.63%) deaths occurred; one was due to a major infarction secondary to stent breakage, and two died of massive reperfusion intracerebral haemorrhage. There were total six ischemic stroke, of the five ischemic strokes wich developed in nonprotection group, two were among 201 cases with predilation alone (0.99%), which developed after stent deployment and postprocedure, and three among 63 cases with postdilation alone (4.76%), which developed immediately after postdilation. The incidence of ischemic stroke was lower among those who were stented with predilation alone than among those who were stented with postdilation alone. This likely results from reduced intimal injury and decreased risk of embolic complications.

摘要

由于颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术(CAS)过程中存在脑栓塞风险,人们对其安全性存在担忧。本文的目的是讨论技术改进可能会改善该手术的结果。在1997年10月至2004年10月期间,对439例连续患者的478条狭窄颈动脉进行了治疗。284条血管在未使用栓子保护装置的情况下进行了支架置入,194条血管使用了保护装置。在未使用保护装置的病例中,201条动脉仅进行了预扩张后置入支架,63条仅进行了后扩张,6条同时进行了预扩张和后扩张,2条两者均未进行,12条使用球囊扩张支架进行了置入。技术成功率为100%。手术过程中和30天随访期间的综合卒中与死亡率在30天时总体为1.67%。发生了3例(0.63%)死亡;1例死于支架断裂继发的大面积梗死,2例死于大量再灌注性脑出血。共有6例缺血性卒中,在非保护组发生的5例缺血性卒中中,2例发生在仅进行预扩张的201例患者中(0.99%),发生在支架置入后及术后,3例发生在仅进行后扩张的63例患者中(4.76%),发生在后扩张后立即出现。仅进行预扩张置入支架的患者中缺血性卒中的发生率低于仅进行后扩张置入支架的患者。这可能是由于内膜损伤减少和栓塞并发症风险降低所致。