PKR 和 I 型干扰素在原发性和继发性感染期间对病毒控制的作用。

Role of PKR and Type I IFNs in viral control during primary and secondary infection.

机构信息

Department of Pathobiological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS Pathog. 2010 Jun 24;6(6):e1000966. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000966.

Abstract

Type I interferons (IFNs) are known to mediate viral control, and also promote survival and expansion of virus-specific CD8+ T cells. However, it is unclear whether signaling cascades involved in eliciting these diverse cellular effects are also distinct. One of the best-characterized anti-viral signaling mechanisms of Type I IFNs is mediated by the IFN-inducible dsRNA activated protein kinase, PKR. Here, we have investigated the role of PKR and Type I IFNs in regulating viral clearance and CD8+ T cell response during primary and secondary viral infections. Our studies demonstrate differential requirement for PKR, in viral control versus elicitation of CD8+ T cell responses during primary infection of mice with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV). PKR-deficient mice mounted potent CD8+ T cell responses, but failed to effectively control LCMV. The compromised LCMV control in the absence of PKR was multifactorial, and linked to less effective CD8+ T cell-mediated viral suppression, enhanced viral replication in cells, and lower steady state expression levels of IFN-responsive genes. Moreover, we show that despite normal expansion of memory CD8+ T cells and differentiation into effectors during a secondary response, effective clearance of LCMV but not vaccinia virus required PKR activity in infected cells. In the absence of Type I IFN signaling, secondary effector CD8+ T cells were ineffective in controlling both LCMV and vaccinia virus replication in vivo. These findings provide insight into cellular pathways of Type I IFN actions, and highlight the under-appreciated importance of innate immune mechanisms of viral control during secondary infections, despite the accelerated responses of memory CD8+ T cells. Additionally, the results presented here have furthered our understanding of the immune correlates of anti-viral protective immunity, which have implications in the rational design of vaccines.

摘要

I 型干扰素(IFNs)已知可介导病毒控制,还可促进病毒特异性 CD8+T 细胞的存活和扩增。然而,尚不清楚引发这些不同细胞效应的信号级联反应是否也不同。I 型 IFNs 诱导的最典型抗病毒信号机制之一是由 IFN 诱导的双链 RNA 激活蛋白激酶(PKR)介导的。在这里,我们研究了 PKR 和 I 型 IFNs 在调节原发性和继发性病毒感染期间的病毒清除和 CD8+T 细胞反应中的作用。我们的研究表明,在淋巴细胞性脉络丛脑膜炎病毒(LCMV)原发性感染期间,PKR 在病毒控制与 CD8+T 细胞反应的诱导方面的作用存在差异。PKR 缺陷型小鼠产生了强大的 CD8+T 细胞反应,但未能有效控制 LCMV。在缺乏 PKR 的情况下,LCMV 控制不佳是多因素的,与更有效的 CD8+T 细胞介导的病毒抑制作用降低、细胞内病毒复制增强以及 IFN 反应基因的稳态表达水平降低有关。此外,我们表明,尽管在二次反应中记忆 CD8+T 细胞正常扩增并分化为效应细胞,但 LCMV 的有效清除而不是痘苗病毒的清除需要感染细胞中的 PKR 活性。在缺乏 I 型 IFN 信号的情况下,效应性 CD8+T 细胞在体内对 LCMV 和痘苗病毒的复制均无效。这些发现提供了对 I 型 IFN 作用的细胞途径的深入了解,并强调了尽管记忆 CD8+T 细胞的反应加速,但在继发性感染中,先天免疫机制对病毒控制的重要性被低估了。此外,这里呈现的结果进一步加深了我们对抗病毒保护免疫的免疫相关性的理解,这对疫苗的合理设计具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cde8/2891951/520638fe81d5/ppat.1000966.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索