Department of Gynecology Oncology, Zhejiang Provincial Cancer Hospital, 38 Guangji Road, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 May;283(5):1133-7. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1574-2. Epub 2010 Jun 29.
To explore and compare the differences in the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of synchronous primary endometrial and ovarian cancers with primary endometrial cancer metastatic to adnexa.
Between January 1997 and December 2009, 51 cases with endometrial cancer simultaneously with adnexa malignancy were identified. Among them, there were 18 cases with synchronous primary cancers of the endometrium and ovary (Group A) and 33 cases with primary endometrial cancer metastatic to the adnexa (Group B). Clinical and pathologic information was obtained from medical records. Parametric methods were used to compare clinical and pathologic features. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed and compared using log-rank test.
The mean age at diagnosis of the disease was 56.6 ± 10.8 years (range 34-76 years) in Group A and 53.1 ± 9.5 years (range 37-76 years) in Group B. The two groups' distribution of preoperative image findings, size of endometrial lesion, myometrial invasion, unilateral or bilateral, cervix invasion, and postoperative radiation existed significant differences. With a mean follow-up time of 4.3 ± 3.4 years (range 2-11 years), 5-year overall survival (OS) was 75 and 56% in Groups A and B, respectively (p = 0.034). The univariate analysis showed only postoperative radiation and synchronous tumors were independent factors which affected OS (p = 0.015; p = 0.034) and progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.015; p = 0.036), respectively. Not any feature was revealed by multivariate analysis as independent prognostic factors.
Our results showed that OS and PFS of synchronous primary ovarian cancer in patients with endometrial cancer is better than those with ovarian metastasis patients. Pre- and intra-operative, intensive and careful assessment, and strict and continuous postoperative surveillance should pay attention to the endometrial cancer patients who preserved ovary for having possibility of coexisting occult ovarian lesions.
探讨和比较原发性子宫内膜癌合并卵巢原发性癌与原发性子宫内膜癌转移至附件的临床病理特征和预后差异。
1997 年 1 月至 2009 年 12 月期间,共确定了 51 例子宫内膜癌合并附件恶性肿瘤患者。其中 18 例为原发性子宫内膜和卵巢同时性癌症(A 组),33 例为原发性子宫内膜癌转移至附件(B 组)。从病历中获取临床和病理信息。采用参数方法比较临床和病理特征。使用 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析并通过对数秩检验进行比较。
A 组患者的平均发病年龄为 56.6 ± 10.8 岁(34-76 岁),B 组为 53.1 ± 9.5 岁(37-76 岁)。两组术前影像学检查结果、子宫内膜病变大小、肌层浸润、单侧或双侧、宫颈浸润和术后放疗的分布存在显著差异。平均随访时间为 4.3 ± 3.4 年(2-11 年),A 组和 B 组的 5 年总生存率(OS)分别为 75%和 56%(p = 0.034)。单因素分析显示,仅术后放疗和同步肿瘤是影响 OS(p = 0.015;p = 0.034)和无进展生存期(PFS)(p = 0.015;p = 0.036)的独立因素。多因素分析未显示任何特征为独立预后因素。
我们的研究结果表明,原发性卵巢癌与子宫内膜癌并存患者的 OS 和 PFS 优于卵巢转移患者。对于保留卵巢的子宫内膜癌患者,应在术前和术中进行密集和仔细的评估,并严格和持续的术后监测,以注意可能同时存在隐匿性卵巢病变的可能性。