Conceptual Immunology Group, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2010 Sep;67(17):2851-62. doi: 10.1007/s00018-010-0438-z. Epub 2010 Jun 24.
This essay was written to illustrate how one might think about the immune system. The formulation of valid theories is the basic component of how-to-think because the reduction of large and complex data sets by the use of logic into a succinct model with predictability and explanatory power, is the only way that we have to arrive at "understanding". Whether it is to achieve effective manipulation of the system or for pure pleasure, "understanding" is a universally agreed upon goal. It is in the nature of science that theories are there to be disproven. An experimentally disproven theory is a successful one. As they fail experimental test one by one, we end up with a default theory, that is, one that has yet to fail. Here, using the self-nonself discrimination as an example, how-to-think as I see it, will be illustrated.
本文旨在阐述人们如何思考免疫系统。理论的合理构建是如何思考的基本组成部分,因为通过逻辑将庞大而复杂的数据集简化为具有可预测性和解释力的简洁模型,是我们达到“理解”的唯一途径。无论是为了实现对系统的有效操控还是为了纯粹的乐趣,“理解”都是一个普遍认同的目标。理论的存在就是为了被证伪,这是科学的本质。一个经过实验证伪的理论就是成功的理论。随着它们一个接一个地经受不住实验的检验,我们最终得到一个默认理论,即尚未被证伪的理论。在这里,我将以自身-非自身识别为例来说明我所认为的思考方法。