美国的成本曲线弯曲：比较效果研究的作用。
Bending the cost curve in the United States: the role of comparative effectiveness research.
机构信息
Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, 2207 Taubman Center, 1500 E, Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0432, USA.
出版信息
Crit Care. 2010;14(3):168. doi: 10.1186/cc9045. Epub 2010 Jun 22.
Abstract
Owing to an increasing focus on the rising cost of medical care in the United States, bending the cost curve has become the central tenet of healthcare reform. The exact definition of this phrase, however, remains elusive. In order to affect change in the cost and quality of healthcare, the importance of comparative effectiveness research must be recognized.
摘要
由于人们越来越关注美国不断上升的医疗保健成本，因此控制成本曲线已成为医疗改革的核心原则。然而，这一短语的确切定义仍然难以捉摸。为了改变医疗保健的成本和质量，必须认识到比较效果研究的重要性。
相似文献
1
Bending the cost curve in the United States: the role of comparative effectiveness research.美国的成本曲线弯曲：比较效果研究的作用。
Crit Care. 2010;14(3):168. doi: 10.1186/cc9045. Epub 2010 Jun 22.
2
Summaries for patients. High-value, cost-conscious health care.患者摘要。高价值、注重成本的医疗保健。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Feb 1;154(3):I30. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-3-201102010-00001.
3
The pragmatist's guide to comparative effectiveness research.实用主义者的比较效果研究指南。
J Econ Perspect. 2011 Spring;25(2):27-46. doi: 10.1257/jep.25.2.27.
4
Medicine's ethical responsibility for health care reform--the Top Five list.医学在医疗保健改革中的伦理责任——五大要点
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jan 28;362(4):283-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0911423. Epub 2009 Dec 23.
5
A political scrum. Post-election battles shaping over healthcare costs.一场政治混战。选举后的斗争围绕医疗成本展开。
Mod Healthc. 2012 Sep 24;42(39):8-9.
6
'We don't have a healthcare crisis in this country' ... yet.“在这个国家，我们尚未面临医疗保健危机”……目前还没有。
Postgrad Med. 1994 Feb 15;95(3):15-6, 23-5. doi: 10.1080/00325481.1994.11945802.
7
Controlling health care costs.控制医疗保健成本。
N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 14;351(16):1591-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp048159.
8
"Value for money": use with care.“性价比”：谨慎使用。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Feb 1;154(3):207-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-3-201102010-00012.
9
High-value, cost-conscious health care: concepts for clinicians to evaluate the benefits, harms, and costs of medical interventions.高值、成本意识的医疗保健：临床医生评估医疗干预措施的获益、危害和成本的概念。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Feb 1;154(3):174-80. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-3-201102010-00007.
10
Physicians and health-care reform: rolling up our sleeves or rolling the dice?医生与医疗改革：是挽起袖子实干还是冒险一搏？
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jul;104(7):1617-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.340.
引用本文的文献
1
Nudging best practice: the HITECH act and behavioral medicine.推动最佳实践：《健康信息技术经济与临床健康法案》与行为医学
Transl Behav Med. 2011 Mar 1;1(1):175-181. doi: 10.1007/s13142-010-0001-3.
2
Measuring resource utilization in patient-oriented comparative effectiveness research: a psychometric study of the Resource Utilization Questionnaire.在以患者为导向的比较效果研究中衡量资源利用情况：资源利用问卷的心理测量学研究
Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2011;25(2):80-106. doi: 10.1891/1541-6577.25.2.80.
本文引用的文献
1
Costs of relaparotomy on-demand versus planned relaparotomy in patients with severe peritonitis: an economic evaluation within a randomized controlled trial.按需再次剖腹探查与计划性再次剖腹探查治疗重度腹膜炎患者的成本比较：一项随机对照试验内的经济学评价。
Crit Care. 2010;14(3):R97. doi: 10.1186/cc9032. Epub 2010 May 27.
2
Bending the cost curve: a critical component of health care reform.控制成本曲线：医疗保健改革的关键组成部分。
JAMA. 2009 Sep 16;302(11):1223-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1373.
3
Comparison of on-demand vs planned relaparotomy strategy in patients with severe peritonitis: a randomized trial.重症腹膜炎患者按需再次剖腹手术与计划性再次剖腹手术策略的比较：一项随机试验
JAMA. 2007 Aug 22;298(8):865-72. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.8.865.
Zotero 插件