• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Subjective organization of U.S. presidents.

作者信息

Brown N R, Siegler R S

机构信息

IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY.

出版信息

Am J Psychol. 1991 Spring;104(1):1-33.

PMID:2058756
Abstract

College students appear to subjectively organize U.S. presidents into three groups and to use this organization to help them learn new information. Results of a paired comparison task in Experiment 1 suggested that subjects organized the presidents into Founding Fathers (Washington through John Quincy Adams), post-World War II presidents (Truman through Reagan), and noncontemporary presidents (Jackson through Franklin Roosevelt). This hypothesized organization was tested in Experiment 2 by presenting subjects with several lists with alternative organizations of the presidents. Difficulty of learning classifications of particular presidents within each list was predicted on the basis of the relation between that president's classification in the list and in the hypothesized preexisting organization. Instances where the preexisting and new classifications were consistent both for the particular president and for all other members of the group were easiest to learn. Instances where the particular president's classification was consistent but where some other presidents in the group were classified differently were of intermediate difficulty. Instances where neither the individual president's classification nor that of the entire group were consistent were most difficult. The results provided converging evidence for the hypothesized subjective organization of the presidents and also demonstrated the usefulness of a method that may be applicable to testing subjective organizations in a wide variety of other areas.

摘要

相似文献

1
Subjective organization of U.S. presidents.
Am J Psychol. 1991 Spring;104(1):1-33.
2
Presidential disability and the XXV Amendment.总统丧失履职能力与《第二十五条修正案》
Bull Am Coll Surg. 1997 Apr;82(4):24-6.
3
Recognizing the Presidents: Was Alexander Hamilton President?认认总统们:亚历山大·汉密尔顿当过总统吗?
Psychol Sci. 2016 May;27(5):644-50. doi: 10.1177/0956797616631113. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
4
Cognitive psychology. Forgetting the presidents.认知心理学。遗忘的总统们。
Science. 2014 Nov 28;346(6213):1106-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1259627.
5
Grief, glory, and political capital in the Capitol: presidents eulogizing presidents.国会大厦里的悲痛、荣耀与政治资本:总统悼念总统。
Death Stud. 2006 May;30(4):325-49. doi: 10.1080/07481180600553302.
6
Inhibition, contextual segregation, and subject strategies in list method directed forgetting.列表法定向遗忘中的抑制、情境分离和主体策略
Conscious Cogn. 1996 Dec;5(4):395-417. doi: 10.1006/ccog.1996.0025.
7
Mental illness in U.S. Presidents between 1776 and 1974: a review of biographical sources.1776年至1974年间美国总统的精神疾病:传记资料综述
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2006 Jan;194(1):47-51. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000195309.17887.f5.
8
Retrieval from long-term store as a function of mental age and intelligence.
Am J Ment Defic. 1986 Jan;90(4):440-8.
9
Franklin Delano Roosevelt: a famous patient.
J Relig Health. 2014 Aug;53(4):1102-11. doi: 10.1007/s10943-014-9886-3.
10
What young chimpanzees know about seeing.幼年黑猩猩对视觉的认知
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1996;61(3):i-vi, 1-152; discussion 153-91.

引用本文的文献

1
Magnitude comparison revisited: an alternative approach to binary choice under uncertainty.重新审视幅度比较:不确定性下的二元选择的另一种方法。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Apr;18(2):392-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0057-1.
2
Evidence for similar principles in episodic and semantic memory: the presidential serial position function.情节记忆和语义记忆中存在相似原则的证据:总统序列位置函数。
Mem Cognit. 2010 Jul;38(5):659-66. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.5.659.
3
Which presidents are most memorable?哪些总统最令人难忘?
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2010 Feb;25(1):32-6. doi: 10.1177/1533317508318832. Epub 2008 Jun 30.
4
The role of categorical information in processing relational attributes.
Mem Cognit. 1996 Nov;24(6):756-65. doi: 10.3758/bf03201100.