• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估阴道镜检查与细胞学检查作为对视觉检查呈阳性的女性进行分流的二级检测方法。

Evaluation of colposcopy vs cytology as secondary test to triage women found positive on visual inspection test.

作者信息

Pimple S A, Amin G, Goswami S, Shastri S S

机构信息

Department of Preventive Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.

出版信息

Indian J Cancer. 2010 Jul-Sep;47(3):308-13. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.64726.

DOI:10.4103/0019-509X.64726
PMID:20587908
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colposcopic evaluation and guided biopsy is an important diagnostic step and standard of management for abnormal cytology smears in developed countries.

AIM

The present study evaluates the performance of colposcopy vs conventional cytology in estimating the presence and grade of cervical disease against the reference standard of histopathology as a secondary test modality to triage women found positive on primary screening by visual inspection with 5% acetic acid (VIA).

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

Colposcopy and directed biopsy were performed after primary screening for cervical cancer in an urban hospital cancer screening clinic between January 2000 and June 2005, in Mumbai, India.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Healthy women (8863) in the age group of 35-65 years participated in the cervical cancer early detection program in the hospital and community cancer screening clinics in Mumbai. Women found positive on the primary screening test by VIA underwent diagnostic evaluation by Pap smear cytology and colposcopy evaluation with directed biopsies.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Accuracy parameters and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated using 2 X 2 tables and standard formulae.

RESULTS

The test range of sensitivity of colposcopy for the detection of histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1+ (CIN1+) or CIN2+ was 58.0-74.7% and that of specificity was 57.5-92.9%. The sensitivity and specificity of cytology to detect CIN2+ was 57.4% and 99.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Colposcopy is a good sensitive test for the detection of CIN and can be considered as a secondary testing tool to triage women found positive on VIA.

摘要

背景

在发达国家,阴道镜评估和引导下活检是异常细胞学涂片重要的诊断步骤和管理标准。

目的

本研究以组织病理学作为二级检测方式,评估阴道镜与传统细胞学在估计宫颈疾病的存在和分级方面的表现,以便对通过5%醋酸肉眼检查(VIA)进行初次筛查呈阳性的女性进行分流。

设置与设计

2000年1月至2005年6月期间,在印度孟买一家城市医院的癌症筛查诊所对宫颈癌进行初次筛查后进行阴道镜检查和定向活检。

材料与方法

年龄在35 - 65岁的健康女性(8863名)参与了孟买医院和社区癌症筛查诊所的宫颈癌早期检测项目。通过VIA初次筛查呈阳性的女性接受巴氏涂片细胞学诊断评估和阴道镜检查及定向活检。

统计分析

使用2×2表格和标准公式计算准确性参数及其95%置信区间。

结果

阴道镜检测组织学确诊的宫颈上皮内瘤变1级及以上(CIN1+)或CIN2+的敏感性测试范围为58.0 - 74.7%,特异性测试范围为57.5 - 92.9%。细胞学检测CIN2+的敏感性和特异性分别为57.4%和99.4%。

结论

阴道镜是检测CIN的良好敏感检测方法,可被视为对VIA检测呈阳性的女性进行分流的二级检测工具。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of colposcopy vs cytology as secondary test to triage women found positive on visual inspection test.评估阴道镜检查与细胞学检查作为对视觉检查呈阳性的女性进行分流的二级检测方法。
Indian J Cancer. 2010 Jul-Sep;47(3):308-13. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.64726.
2
Cervical screening with primary HPV testing or cytology in a population of women in which those aged 33 years or younger had previously been offered HPV vaccination: Results of the Compass pilot randomised trial.在一个33岁及以下女性此前已接种HPV疫苗的女性群体中,采用原发性HPV检测或细胞学进行宫颈癌筛查:指南针试点随机试验的结果。
PLoS Med. 2017 Sep 19;14(9):e1002388. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002388. eCollection 2017 Sep.
3
The IMproving Primary Screening And Colposcopy Triage trial: human papillomavirus, cervical cytology, and histopathologic results from the baseline and 1-year follow-up phase.IMproving Primary Screening And Colposcopy Triage 试验:人乳头瘤病毒、宫颈细胞学和组织病理学结果,来自基线和 1 年随访阶段。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Sep;225(3):278.e1-278.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.03.047. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
4
Age-specific evaluation of primary human papillomavirus screening vs conventional cytology in a randomized setting.在随机环境中对原发性人乳头瘤病毒筛查与传统细胞学进行特定年龄评估。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Dec 2;101(23):1612-23. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp367. Epub 2009 Nov 9.
5
Human papillomavirus test with cytology triage in organized screening for cervical cancer.在宫颈癌组织筛查中采用人乳头瘤病毒检测及细胞学分流
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 Nov;95(11):1220-1227. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13013.
6
Evaluation of visual inspection with acetic acid as a feasible screening test for cervical neoplasia.评估醋酸目视检查作为子宫颈肿瘤可行筛查试验的效果。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011 Dec;37(12):1802-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2011.01614.x. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
7
Artificial intelligence-assisted cytology for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or invasive cancer: A multicenter, clinical-based, observational study.人工智能辅助细胞学检测宫颈上皮内瘤变或浸润性癌:一项多中心、基于临床的观察性研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Oct;159(1):171-178. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.07.099. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
8
Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.25 岁及以上女性宫颈癌筛查中致癌型人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测及 HPV16 或 HPV18 基因分型的性能:ATHENA 研究的一项亚组分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Sep;12(9):880-90. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70188-7. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
9
HPV testing with cytology triage for cervical cancer screening in routine practice.细胞学分流的 HPV 检测在常规宫颈癌筛查中的应用。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 May;210(5):474.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.12.033. Epub 2013 Dec 25.
10
Comparison of visual inspection with acetic acid and cervical cytology to detect high-grade cervical neoplasia among HIV-infected women in India.比较印度 HIV 感染女性中醋酸视觉检查与宫颈细胞学检查对高级别宫颈癌的检出率。
Int J Cancer. 2012 Jan 1;130(1):234-40. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25971. Epub 2011 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Colposcopy and Histopathology in Abnormal Cervix.宫颈异常的阴道镜检查与组织病理学比较
Cureus. 2024 Feb 15;16(2):e54274. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54274. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Discrepancy between Cytology and Histology in Cervical Cancer Screening: a Multicenter Retrospective Study (KGOG 1040).细胞学与组织学在宫颈癌筛查中的差异:一项多中心回顾性研究(KGOG 1040)。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Jun 21;36(24):e164. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e164.
3
The Diagnostic Efficacy of Swede Score for Prediction of Pre-invasive Cervical Lesions: A Prospective Hospital-Based Study.
瑞典评分法预测宫颈上皮内瘤变的诊断效能:一项基于医院的前瞻性研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2020 Dec;70(6):497-502. doi: 10.1007/s13224-020-01344-2. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
4
Comparative Study of Smart Scope® Visual Screening Test with Naked Eye Visual Screening and Pap Test.智能镜®视觉筛查试验与肉眼视觉筛查和巴氏涂片检查的比较研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020 Dec 1;21(12):3509-3515. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.12.3509.
5
Evaluation of cytology as secondary triage in visual inspection after application of 4% acetic acid-based cervical cancer screening program.在应用基于4%醋酸的宫颈癌筛查程序后,评估细胞学作为视觉检查中的二级分诊方法。
South Asian J Cancer. 2019 Apr-Jun;8(2):102-107. doi: 10.4103/sajc.sajc_50_18.
6
Correlation of Two Colposcopic Indices for Predicting Premalignant Lesions of Cervix.两种用于预测宫颈癌前病变的阴道镜指数的相关性
J Midlife Health. 2017 Jul-Sep;8(3):118-123. doi: 10.4103/jmh.JMH_22_17.
7
Analysis of Sensitivity, Specificity, and Positive and Negative Predictive Values of Smear and Colposcopy in Diagnosis of Premalignant and Malignant Cervical Lesions.涂片和阴道镜检查在诊断宫颈癌前病变和恶性病变中的敏感性、特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值分析
Med Sci Monit. 2015 Dec 10;21:3860-7. doi: 10.12659/msm.895227.
8
Evaluation of the accuracy in detecting cervical lesions by nurses versus doctors using a stationary colposcope and Gynocular in a low-resource setting.在资源匮乏地区,比较护士和医生使用固定式阴道镜和双目阴道镜检测宫颈病变的准确性。
BMJ Open. 2014 Nov 3;4(11):e005313. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005313.
9
Concordance between hybrid capture 2 results performed on cervical samples obtained before and immediately after visual inspection with acetic Acid test.在醋酸试验视觉检查之前和之后立即采集的宫颈样本上进行的杂交捕获2结果之间的一致性。
Int J Prev Med. 2014 Feb;5(2):191-5.
10
Evaluation of stationary colposcope and the Gynocular, by the Swede score systematic colposcopic system in VIA positive women: a crossover randomized trial.评价固定式阴道镜和阴道镜检查仪(Gynocular)在 VIA 阳性女性中的应用:一项交叉随机试验——瑞典评分系统阴道镜检查法。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Feb;24(2):339-45. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000042.