Suppr超能文献

纳洛酮预防硬膜外吗啡用于癌痛镇痛的不良反应

[Prevention by naloxone of adverse effects of epidural morphine analgesia for cancer pain].

作者信息

Vedrenne J B, Esteve M, Guillaume A

机构信息

Institut Curie, Section Médicale et Hospitalière, Paris.

出版信息

Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1991;10(2):98-103. doi: 10.1016/s0750-7658(05)80448-4.

Abstract

Forty cancer patients were randomly assigned to two groups (n = 20). All had incapacitating pain unresponsive to the usual non opioid analgesic drugs. An epidural catheter was set up at the level of the most painful metamere, and made to pass subcutaneously so as to exit either in the supraclacicular fossa, or on the patient's flank. At T0, the patients were given 4 mg morphine hydrochloride diluted in 10 ml normal saline. Thirty min later, patients in the naloxone group (group N) were given a 0.4 mg bolus, followed by a constant rate infusion of 5 micrograms.kg-1.h-1, of naloxone hydrochloride during 18 h. Patients in group P (placebo) were given normal saline instead. The degree of pain was studied with a visual analogue scale and analgesia was assessed by a clinician on a five point scale. These two parameters were obtained half an hour after the injection of morphine and 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours later. At the same time, the patients were questioned about adverse side-effects: nausea, vomiting, pruritus, dysuria, urinary retention. Respiratory depression was assessed clinically and biologically (blood gas measurements at the afore mentioned times). Heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure were also measured. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in quality and duration of analgesia. Pain reached its lowest level 4 h after the injection of morphine, returning to half its original value at the 24th h. This was also true for the incidence of nausea (11 in group N, 5 in group P), vomiting (3 in both groups), and urinary retention (6 in group P, 5 in group N).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

40名癌症患者被随机分为两组(n = 20)。所有患者均有严重疼痛,对常规非阿片类镇痛药无反应。在最疼痛的脊髓节段水平置入硬膜外导管,并使其经皮下穿出,出口位于锁骨上窝或患者侧腹。在T0时,给患者静脉注射用10 ml生理盐水稀释的4 mg盐酸吗啡。30分钟后,纳洛酮组(N组)患者静脉推注0.4 mg纳洛酮,随后在18小时内以5 μg·kg-1·h-1的速率持续输注盐酸纳洛酮。P组(安慰剂组)患者则给予生理盐水。采用视觉模拟评分法研究疼痛程度,由临床医生采用五点量表评估镇痛效果。在注射吗啡后半小时以及2、4、6和24小时后获取这两个参数。同时,询问患者有关不良反应:恶心、呕吐、瘙痒、排尿困难、尿潴留。通过临床和生物学方法(在上述时间进行血气测量)评估呼吸抑制情况。还测量心率、收缩压和舒张压。两组在镇痛质量和持续时间上无统计学显著差异。注射吗啡后4小时疼痛降至最低水平,在第24小时恢复至初始值的一半。恶心发生率(N组11例,P组5例)、呕吐发生率(两组均为3例)和尿潴留发生率(P组6例,N组5例)也是如此。(摘要截断于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验