Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Division of Pediatric Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe St., Blalock 904, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Anesth Analg. 2011 Oct;113(4):834-42. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31822c9a44. Epub 2011 Sep 2.
Opioid-induced side effects, such as pruritus, nausea, and vomiting are common and may be more debilitating than pain itself. A continuous low-dose naloxone infusion (0.25 μg/kg/h) ameliorates some of these side effects in many but not all patients without adversely affecting analgesia. We sought to determine the optimal dose of naloxone required to minimize opioid-induced side effects and to measure plasma morphine and naloxone levels in a dose escalation study.
Fifty-nine pediatric patients (24 male/35 female; average age 14.2 ± 2.2 years) experiencing moderate to severe postoperative pain were started on IV patient-controlled analgesia morphine (basal infusion 20 μg/kg/h, demand dose 20 μg/kg, 5 doses/h) and a low-dose naloxone infusion (initial cohort: 0.05 μg/kg/h; subsequent cohorts: 0.10, 0.15, 0.25, 0.40, 0.65, 1, and 1.65 μg/kg/h). If 2 patients developed intolerable nausea, vomiting, or pruritus, the naloxone infusion was increased for subsequent patients. Dose/treatment success occurred when 10 patients had minimal side effects at a naloxone dose. Blood samples were obtained for measurement of plasma morphine and naloxone levels after initiation of the naloxone infusion, processed, stored, and measured by tandem mass spectrometry with electrospray positive ionization.
The minimum naloxone dose at which patients were successfully treated with a <10% side effect/failure rate was 1 μg/kg/h; cohort size varied between 4 and 11 patients. Naloxone was more effective in preventing pruritus than nausea and vomiting. Concomitant use of supplemental medicines to treat opioid-induced side effects was required at all naloxone infusion rates. Plasma naloxone levels were below the level of assay quantification (0.1 ng/mL) for infusion rates ≤0.15 μg/kg/h. At rates >0.25 μg/kg/h, plasma levels increased linearly with increasing infusion rate. In each dose cohort, patients who failed therapy had comparable or higher plasma naloxone levels than those levels measured in patients who did not fail treatment. Plasma morphine levels ranged between 3.52 and 172 ng/mL, and >90% of levels ranged between 10.2 and 61.6 ng/mL. Plasma morphine levels were comparable between patients who failed therapy and those patients who achieved symptom control.
Naloxone infusion rates ≥1 μg/kg/h significantly reduced, but did not eliminate, the incidence of opioid-induced side effects in postoperative pediatric patients receiving IV patient-controlled analgesia morphine. Patients who failed therapy generally had plasma naloxone and morphine levels that were comparable to those who had good symptom relief suggesting that success or failure to ameliorate opioid-induced side effects was unrelated to plasma levels.
阿片类药物引起的副作用,如瘙痒、恶心和呕吐是常见的,可能比疼痛本身更具致残性。持续低剂量纳洛酮输注(0.25μg/kg/h)可改善许多患者的这些副作用,但不能改善所有患者的副作用,且不会对镇痛产生不利影响。我们旨在确定最小剂量的纳洛酮以最小化阿片类药物引起的副作用,并在剂量递增研究中测量血浆吗啡和纳洛酮水平。
59 名经历中度至重度术后疼痛的儿科患者(24 名男性/35 名女性;平均年龄 14.2±2.2 岁)开始接受 IV 患者自控镇痛吗啡(基础输注 20μg/kg/h,需求剂量 20μg/kg,5 次/h)和低剂量纳洛酮输注(初始队列:0.05μg/kg/h;随后队列:0.10、0.15、0.25、0.40、0.65、1 和 1.65μg/kg/h)。如果 2 名患者出现无法耐受的恶心、呕吐或瘙痒,纳洛酮输注会增加后续患者的剂量。当 10 名患者的纳洛酮剂量出现最小副作用时,就会出现剂量/治疗成功。在纳洛酮输注开始后采集血样,进行处理、储存,并通过电喷雾正离子化串联质谱法进行测量。
患者以<10%的副作用/失败率成功治疗的最小纳洛酮剂量为 1μg/kg/h;队列大小在 4 至 11 名患者之间变化。纳洛酮在预防瘙痒方面比预防恶心和呕吐更有效。在所有纳洛酮输注率下,都需要同时使用补充药物来治疗阿片类药物引起的副作用。输注率≤0.15μg/kg/h 时,纳洛酮的血浆水平低于检测限(0.1ng/mL)。输注率>0.25μg/kg/h 时,血浆水平随输注率线性增加。在每个剂量队列中,治疗失败的患者的血浆纳洛酮水平与未治疗失败的患者的水平相当或更高。血浆吗啡水平在 3.52 至 172ng/mL 之间,>90%的水平在 10.2 至 61.6ng/mL 之间。治疗失败的患者和达到症状控制的患者的血浆吗啡水平相当。
静脉注射患者自控镇痛吗啡的儿科患者接受≥1μg/kg/h 的纳洛酮输注可显著降低,但不能消除阿片类药物引起的副作用发生率。一般来说,治疗失败的患者的血浆纳洛酮和吗啡水平与有良好症状缓解的患者相当,这表明缓解阿片类药物引起的副作用的成功或失败与血浆水平无关。