Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, RIKEN-MIT Center for Neural Circuit Genetics, MIT Cambridge, MA, USA.
Front Neuroanat. 2010 Jun 9;4:22. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2010.00022. eCollection 2010.
"Column," like "gene," has both conceptual and linguistic shortcomings. The simple question "what is a column" is not easy to answer and the word itself is not easy to replace. In the present article, I have selected five points, in no way comprehensive or canonical, but which may nevertheless serve as a prompt and aid for further discussions and re-evaluation. These are: that anatomical columns are not solid structures, that they are part of locally interdigitating systems, that any delimited column also participates in a widely distributed network, that columns are not an obligatory cortical feature, and that columns (as "modules") occur widely in the brain in non-cortical structures. I focus on the larger scale macrocolumns, mainly from an anatomical perspective. My position is that cortical organization is inherently dynamic and likely to incorporate multiple processing styles. One can speculate that the distributed mappings within areas like piriform cortex may resemble at least one mode of neocortical processing strategy.
"Column"(柱)一词,像"gene"(基因)一样,既有概念上的缺陷,也有语言表达上的不足。简单地问“什么是柱”并不容易回答,而且这个词本身也不容易替换。在本文中,我选择了五个方面,它们不是全面或规范的,但可能有助于进一步的讨论和重新评估。这些方面是:解剖柱不是实体结构,它们是局部交织系统的一部分,任何有界的柱也参与广泛分布的网络,柱不是皮质的强制性特征,以及柱(作为“模块”)广泛存在于大脑的非皮质结构中。我主要从解剖学的角度关注较大的宏观柱。我的立场是,皮质组织本质上是动态的,可能包含多种处理方式。人们可以推测,梨状皮层等区域内的分布式映射可能至少类似于新皮质处理策略的一种模式。