Department of Surgery, Memorial-Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
HPB (Oxford). 2010 Jun;12(5):302-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00182.x.
As the number of effective treatment options has increased, the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma has become complex. The most appropriate therapy depends largely on the functional status of the underlying liver. In patients with advanced cirrhosis and tumor extent within the Milan criteria, liver transplantation is clearly the best option, as this therapy treats the cancer along with the underlying hepatic parenchymal disease. As the results of transplantation has become established in patients with limited disease, investigation has increasingly focused on downstaging patients with disease outside of Milan criteria and defining the upper limits of transplantable tumors. In patients with well preserved hepatic function, liver resection is the most appropriate and effective treatment. Hepatic resection is not as constrained by tumor extent and location to the same degree as transplantation and ablative therapies. Some patients who recur after resection may still be eligible for transplantation. Ablative therapies, particularly percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and transarterial chemoembolization have been used primarily to treat patients with low volume irresectable tumors. Whether ablation of small tumors provides long term disease control that is comparable to resection remains unclear.
随着有效治疗方案数量的增加,肝细胞癌患者的治疗管理变得复杂。最合适的治疗方法在很大程度上取决于基础肝脏的功能状态。对于晚期肝硬化和肿瘤范围符合米兰标准的患者,肝移植显然是最佳选择,因为这种治疗方法可以同时治疗癌症和潜在的肝实质疾病。随着移植治疗结果在局限性疾病患者中得到确立,研究越来越关注对米兰标准以外疾病患者进行降期治疗,并确定可移植肿瘤的上限。对于肝功能良好的患者,肝切除术是最合适和最有效的治疗方法。肝切除术不像移植和消融治疗那样受到肿瘤范围和位置的限制。一些在切除后复发的患者可能仍然有资格接受移植。消融治疗,特别是经皮射频消融和经动脉化疗栓塞,主要用于治疗体积较小的不可切除肿瘤的患者。消融小肿瘤是否能提供与切除相当的长期疾病控制仍不清楚。