von Rettberg M, Thil E, Genzwürker H, Gernoth C, Hinkelbein J
Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Anaesthesist. 2011 Apr;60(4):334-42. doi: 10.1007/s00101-010-1756-0.
Estimating the endotracheal tube size with the optimal internal diameter (ID) is of outstanding importance for airway management in pediatric patients. For many years different weight, height, and/or age-based formulas have been published. The aim of the present study was to identify and to compare published formulas to estimate optimal tube size in pediatric patients.
A PubMed search was performed to identify published formulas for tube diameter in pediatric patients. The keywords "pediatric" or "paediatric", "anesthesia" or "anaesthesia", "anaesthesiology" or "anesthesiology", "size", "formula", "diameter", "tube" or "endotracheal tube" were used. Analysis was limited to articles published between 01.01.1951 and 30.06.2009. Additionally, similar publications retrieved from PubMed (related articles) and cited references were identified. Publications and formulas were assessed and classified by two independent colleagues.
In the specified time-frame, 13 publications (11 original contributions and 2 letters to the editor) were identified with PubMed and 3 more formulas with the extended search. Altogether 22 formulas to estimate appropriate endotracheal tube size for pediatric patients (age 0-18 years) were identified: 12 age-based formulas for tubes without a cuff, 4 height-based formulas for tubes without a cuff, 2 weight-based formulas for tubes without a cuff and one multivariate formula for tubes without a cuff as well as 3 age-based formulas for cuffed endotracheal tubes.
The identified formulas were comparatively simple to apply but were validated only for pediatric patients older than 1 year. Using tubes with a cuff can minimize the problem of optimal tube size. If a tube without a cuff is intended to be used other sizes should also be available.
估算具有最佳内径(ID)的气管导管尺寸对于儿科患者的气道管理极为重要。多年来,已公布了多种基于体重、身高和/或年龄的公式。本研究的目的是识别并比较已公布的用于估算儿科患者最佳导管尺寸的公式。
在PubMed上进行检索,以识别已公布的儿科患者气管导管直径公式。使用了关键词“儿科的”或“小儿科的”、“麻醉”或“麻醉学”、“麻醉学”或“麻醉学”、“尺寸”、“公式”、“直径”、“导管”或“气管导管”。分析仅限于1951年1月1日至2009年6月30日期间发表的文章。此外,还识别了从PubMed检索到的类似出版物(相关文章)和引用的参考文献。由两位独立的同事对出版物和公式进行评估和分类。
在指定的时间范围内,通过PubMed识别出13篇出版物(11篇原创文章和2封给编辑的信),通过扩展检索又识别出3个更多的公式。总共识别出22个用于估算儿科患者(0至18岁)合适气管导管尺寸的公式:12个基于年龄的无套囊导管公式、4个基于身高的无套囊导管公式、2个基于体重的无套囊导管公式和1个基于多变量的无套囊导管公式,以及3个基于年龄的有套囊气管导管公式。
所识别的公式应用起来相对简单,但仅在1岁以上的儿科患者中得到验证。使用有套囊的导管可以最大程度地减少最佳导管尺寸的问题。如果打算使用无套囊的导管,也应准备其他尺寸的导管。