• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科有套囊与无套囊气管内导管的Meta分析

Cuffed Versus Uncuffed Endotracheal Tubes in Pediatrics: A Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Chen Liang, Zhang Jun, Pan Guoshi, Li Xia, Shi Tianwu, He Wensheng

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, The Second People's Hospital of Hefei, Hefei Hospital Affiliated to Medical University of Anhui, No. 246 Heping Road, Hefei, 230011, Anhui Province, China.

出版信息

Open Med (Wars). 2018 Sep 8;13:366-373. doi: 10.1515/med-2018-0055. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1515/med-2018-0055
PMID:30211319
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6132085/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes are commonly used for pediatric patients in surgery and emergency situations. It is still controversial which approach should be adopted. The purpose of the study was to compare the application of cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes in pediatric patients.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library for clinical trials, which compared the two applications in children. The study characteristics and clinical data were summarized by two independent reviewers. Meta-analysis of the data was done using Revman 5.3 software.

RESULTS

6 studies with 4141 cases were included in this meta-analysis. The pooling analysis showed that more patients need tube changes in uncuffed than cuffed tubes (OR: 0.07, 95% CI: 0.05-0.10, P < 0.00001). However, there were no differences on intubation duration, reintubation occurrence, accidental extubation rate, croup occurrence and racemic epinephrine use during the intubation process. Also we didn't find any differences on laryngospasm and stridor occurrence after extubation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that uncuffed endotracheal tubes increased the need for tube changes. Other incidences or complications between the two groups had no differences. Cuffed tubes may be an optimal option for pediatric patients. But more trials are needed in the future.

摘要

背景

带套囊和不带套囊的气管内导管常用于小儿外科手术和紧急情况。应采用哪种方法仍存在争议。本研究的目的是比较带套囊和不带套囊气管内导管在小儿患者中的应用情况。

方法

我们检索了PubMed、科学网和考克兰图书馆,查找比较这两种导管在儿童中应用情况的临床试验。由两名独立审阅者总结研究特征和临床数据。使用Revman 5.3软件对数据进行荟萃分析。

结果

本荟萃分析纳入了6项研究,共4141例病例。汇总分析显示,与带套囊导管相比,不带套囊导管需要更换导管的患者更多(比值比:0.07,95%置信区间:0.05 - 0.10,P < 0.00001)。然而,在插管持续时间、再次插管发生率、意外拔管率、喉炎发生率以及插管过程中使用消旋肾上腺素方面,两组并无差异。在拔管后喉痉挛和喘鸣的发生率方面,我们也未发现差异。

结论

我们的研究表明,不带套囊的气管内导管增加了更换导管的需求。两组之间的其他发生率或并发症并无差异。带套囊导管可能是小儿患者的最佳选择。但未来还需要更多试验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abe8/6132085/53158fe2a1c6/med-13-366-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abe8/6132085/c9907563d660/med-13-366-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abe8/6132085/6482c0d2ed1d/med-13-366-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abe8/6132085/471804df37e8/med-13-366-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abe8/6132085/1199a59711f2/med-13-366-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abe8/6132085/83473cfca72d/med-13-366-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abe8/6132085/4e7f5181e1eb/med-13-366-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abe8/6132085/f5576b85d27f/med-13-366-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abe8/6132085/c522425e84fb/med-13-366-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abe8/6132085/53158fe2a1c6/med-13-366-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abe8/6132085/c9907563d660/med-13-366-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abe8/6132085/6482c0d2ed1d/med-13-366-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abe8/6132085/471804df37e8/med-13-366-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abe8/6132085/1199a59711f2/med-13-366-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abe8/6132085/83473cfca72d/med-13-366-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abe8/6132085/4e7f5181e1eb/med-13-366-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abe8/6132085/f5576b85d27f/med-13-366-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abe8/6132085/c522425e84fb/med-13-366-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abe8/6132085/53158fe2a1c6/med-13-366-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Cuffed Versus Uncuffed Endotracheal Tubes in Pediatrics: A Meta-analysis.儿科有套囊与无套囊气管内导管的Meta分析
Open Med (Wars). 2018 Sep 8;13:366-373. doi: 10.1515/med-2018-0055. eCollection 2018.
2
Cuffed versus uncuffed endotracheal tubes for general anaesthesia in children aged eight years and under.八岁及以下儿童全身麻醉时使用带套囊与不带套囊气管内导管的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 17;11(11):CD011954. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011954.pub2.
3
Cuffed versus uncuffed endotracheal tubes in children: a meta-analysis.儿童带套囊与不带套囊气管内导管的比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Anesth. 2016 Feb;30(1):3-11. doi: 10.1007/s00540-015-2062-4. Epub 2015 Aug 22.
4
Incidence of Post-extubation Stridor in Infants With Cuffed vs. Uncuffed Endotracheal Tube: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.使用带套囊与不带套囊气管内导管的婴儿拔管后喘鸣的发生率:一项回顾性队列分析
Front Pediatr. 2022 May 11;10:864766. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.864766. eCollection 2022.
5
Work of breathing for cuffed and uncuffed pediatric endotracheal tubes in an in vitro lung model setting.在体外肺模型环境中,带套囊和不带套囊的儿科气管内导管的呼吸功。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2018 Sep;28(9):780-787. doi: 10.1111/pan.13430. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
6
Comparison of cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes in young children during general anesthesia.全身麻醉期间小儿带套囊与不带套囊气管内导管的比较。
Anesthesiology. 1997 Mar;86(3):627-31; discussion 27A. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199703000-00015.
7
The incidence of postoperative respiratory complications: A retrospective analysis of cuffed vs uncuffed tracheal tubes in children 0-7 years of age.术后呼吸并发症的发生率:对0至7岁儿童使用带套囊与不带套囊气管导管的回顾性分析。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2018 Mar;28(3):210-217. doi: 10.1111/pan.13340.
8
Prospective randomized controlled multi-centre trial of cuffed or uncuffed endotracheal tubes in small children.小儿带套囊与不带套囊气管内导管的前瞻性随机对照多中心试验。
Br J Anaesth. 2009 Dec;103(6):867-73. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep290. Epub 2009 Nov 3.
9
Cuffed versus uncuffed endotracheal tubes in neonates undergoing noncardiac surgeries: A randomized controlled trial.新生儿非心脏手术中带套囊与无套囊气管导管的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2024 Oct;34(10):1045-1052. doi: 10.1111/pan.14953. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
10
A Systematic Review on the Current Attitudes and Clinical Practices on the Use of Cuffed and Uncuffed Endotracheal Tubes in Pediatric Anesthesia.关于小儿麻醉中使用带套囊和不带套囊气管内导管的当前态度和临床实践的系统评价
Acta Med Philipp. 2024 May 23;58(9):22-29. doi: 10.47895/amp.v58i9.8743. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Exchange rates of second generation Microcuff® pediatric endotracheal tubes in children weighing more than 3 kg : A retrospective audit.体重超过3千克儿童使用第二代Microcuff®小儿气管内导管的汇率:一项回顾性审计。 (注:这里原文中的“Exchange rates”可能有误,结合语境推测更可能是“尺寸规格”之类意思,比如“Exchange sizes”,但按照给定原文准确翻译就是上述内容 )
Anaesthesiologie. 2024 Dec;73(12):829-836. doi: 10.1007/s00101-024-01486-2. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
2
Effect of use of cuffed endotracheal tubes on the occurrence of postoperative extubation-related respiratory adverse events in pediatric patients with airway hypersensitivity: a retrospective cohort study.带套囊气管内导管的使用对气道高敏反应小儿患者术后拔管相关呼吸不良事件发生情况的影响:一项回顾性队列研究
J Anesth. 2025 Feb;39(1):61-66. doi: 10.1007/s00540-024-03423-4. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Cuffed versus uncuffed endotracheal tubes for general anaesthesia in children aged eight years and under.八岁及以下儿童全身麻醉时使用带套囊与不带套囊气管内导管的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 17;11(11):CD011954. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011954.pub2.
2
Cuffed endotracheal tubes in children: the effect of the size of the cuffed endotracheal tube on intracuff pressure.儿童带套囊气管内导管:带套囊气管内导管尺寸对套囊内压力的影响
Paediatr Anaesth. 2017 May;27(5):494-500. doi: 10.1111/pan.13099. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
3
Comparison of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) with cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes in infants.
A Systematic Review on the Current Attitudes and Clinical Practices on the Use of Cuffed and Uncuffed Endotracheal Tubes in Pediatric Anesthesia.关于小儿麻醉中使用带套囊和不带套囊气管内导管的当前态度和临床实践的系统评价
Acta Med Philipp. 2024 May 23;58(9):22-29. doi: 10.47895/amp.v58i9.8743. eCollection 2024.
4
Airway Management in Pediatric Patients: Cuff-Solved Problem?儿科患者的气道管理:套囊解决问题了吗?
Children (Basel). 2022 Sep 28;9(10):1490. doi: 10.3390/children9101490.
5
Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure Monitor: A Fancy Gadget or Necessary Tool in Intensivist's Armamentarium.气管内导管套囊压力监测仪:重症监护医生装备中的一件新奇小玩意儿还是必要工具?
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Feb;25(2):121-122. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23742.
6
Frequency and characterization of the use of cuffed tracheal tubes in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units in Brazil.巴西新生儿和儿科重症监护病房中使用带套囊气管导管的频率和特征。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2020 Jun;32(2):235-243. doi: 10.5935/0103-507x.20200038. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
7
Uncuffed Endotracheal Tube Experience in Pediatric Patients with Laparotomy and Laparoscopic Surgeries.小儿剖腹术和腹腔镜手术中无套囊气管插管的体验。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 May 9;2020:6325293. doi: 10.1155/2020/6325293. eCollection 2020.
8
Endotracheal cuff pressures in the PICU: Incidence of underinflation and overinflation.儿科重症监护病房中的气管内套管压力:充气不足和充气过度的发生率。
Can J Respir Ther. 2020 Jan 21;56:1-4. doi: 10.29390/cjrt-2019-018. eCollection 2019.
婴儿中喉罩气道(PLMA)与带套囊和不带套囊气管内导管的比较。
Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2016 Nov 10;16(4):286-291. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2016.1219.
4
Evaluation of emergency pediatric tracheal intubation by pediatric anesthesiologists on inpatient units and the emergency department.儿科麻醉医生在住院部和急诊科对小儿紧急气管插管的评估。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2016 Apr;26(4):384-91. doi: 10.1111/pan.12839. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
5
Cuffed versus uncuffed endotracheal tubes in children: a meta-analysis.儿童带套囊与不带套囊气管内导管的比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Anesth. 2016 Feb;30(1):3-11. doi: 10.1007/s00540-015-2062-4. Epub 2015 Aug 22.
6
Stridor in Neonates After Using the Microcuff® and Uncuffed Tracheal Tubes: A Retrospective Review.使用Microcuff®气管导管和无套囊气管导管后新生儿的喘鸣:一项回顾性研究
Anesth Analg. 2015 Nov;121(5):1321-4. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000918.
7
Pediatric airway anatomy may not be what we thought: implications for clinical practice and the use of cuffed endotracheal tubes.小儿气道解剖结构可能并非我们所想:对临床实践及带套囊气管内导管使用的启示
Paediatr Anaesth. 2015 Jan;25(1):9-19. doi: 10.1111/pan.12528. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
8
Inspiratory stridor after tracheal intubation with a MicroCuff® tracheal tube in three young infants.三名幼儿使用MicroCuff®气管导管进行气管插管后出现吸气性喘鸣。
Anesthesiology. 2013 Mar;118(3):748-50. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318282cc7a.
9
Unplanned extubation in the neonatal ICU: a systematic review, critical appraisal, and evidence-based recommendations.新生儿重症监护病房中计划外拔管:系统评价、批判性评估和循证推荐。
Respir Care. 2013 Jul;58(7):1237-45. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02164. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
10
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and publication bias.系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目 (PRISMA) 声明和发表偏倚。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2011 Mar;39(2):91-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2010.11.001. Epub 2010 Dec 9.