Endotracheal Tube Size Estimation in Paediatric Patients: A Head-to-head Comparison of Accuracy Between Ultrasonography and Age-based Formula.

OBJECTIVE

In the paediatric population, the selection of an appropriately sized endotracheal tube (ETT) is extremely important not only to ensure adequate ventilation but also to avoid post-extubation stridor and stenosis. Conventionally, formulas based on age, height, or weight are used to determine the most appropriate size. In this study, we compared ultrasonography (USG) and age-based formula for predicting the best microcuff ETT size in paediatric patients aged 1-5 years.

METHODS

One hundred eighteen patients, aged 1 to 5 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists, classifications of I or II, were included. After standard general anaesthesia protocols, the subglottic diameter was assessed by USG. Intubation was performed using ETT size according to age-based formula. The best clinical fit was determined after the leak test. The internal and external diameters of the ETTs were predicted by both methods and correlated with the best-fit ETT sizes used during the procedures using Pearson's correlation. Cohen's kappa was used for statistical agreement between two methods.

RESULTS

USG had a significantly higher correlation with the best-fit model as compared to the age-based formula, with 99.2% and 77.1% agreement rates. The best-fit ETT showed a better correlation with the USG-guided estimate (r = 0.994, < 0.001). The Cohen's Kappa value of 0.986 showed a statistically significantly higher agreement between USG-guided estimate and best-fit ETT.

CONCLUSION

USG-guided estimation of subglottic diameter is a better predictor for optimally sized microcuff ETT than the age-based formula in the paediatric age group of 1-5 years. 22% of tube changes could have been prevented with ultrasound-guidance as a primary approach for estimating ETT size.