Department of Orthopedics, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Jul;13(1):47-51. doi: 10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09680.
OBJECT The aim in this prospective study was to determine the morphological limitations of laminoplasty for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) by using intraoperative ultrasonography and to investigate correlations between ultrasonographic findings and 2-year follow-up results. METHODS Included in this study were 40 patients who underwent double-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy due to OPLL. Intraoperative ultrasonography was used to evaluate posterior shift of the spinal cord after the posterior decompression procedure. To determine the decompression status of the cord, the authors classified ultrasonographic findings into 3 types on the basis of the presence or absence of spinal cord contact with OPLL after decompression: Type 1, noncontact; Type 2, contact and apart; and Type 3, contact. Patients were divided accordingly into Group 1, showing Type 1 or 2 findings, representing sufficient decompression; and Group 2, showing Type 3 findings with insufficient decompression. Preoperative sagittal alignment of the cervical spine (C2-7 angle) and preoperative maximal thickness of OPLL were compared between groups. The authors also investigated the morphological limitations of laminoplasty and 2-year follow-up results by using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring system. RESULTS According to receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, an OPLL maximal thickness > 7.2 mm was a cutoff value for insufficient decompression. However, sufficient or insufficient decompression did not correlate with 2-year results, as determined by JOA scores. The C2-7 angle had no impact on ultrasonographic findings. CONCLUSIONS Laminoplasty has a morphological limitation for thick OPLLs, and a thickness > 7.2 mm represents a theoretical cutoff for residual cord compression after laminoplasty. According to 2-year results, however, laminoplasty can remain the first choice for any type of multiple-level OPLL.
目的:本前瞻性研究旨在通过术中超声确定颈椎后纵韧带骨化症(OPLL)椎板成形术的形态学限制,并探讨超声表现与 2 年随访结果之间的相关性。
方法:本研究纳入了 40 例因 OPLL 导致颈脊髓病而行双开门椎板成形术的患者。术中超声用于评估后路减压术后脊髓的后移情况。为了确定脊髓的减压情况,作者根据减压后脊髓与 OPLL 是否接触将超声表现分为 3 型:1 型,无接触;2 型,接触但分离;3 型,接触。据此,患者分为 2 组:1 组表现为 1 型或 2 型,代表充分减压;2 组表现为 3 型,提示减压不足。比较两组患者术前颈椎矢状位排列(C2-7 角)和术前 OPLL 最大厚度。作者还通过日本矫形协会(JOA)评分系统研究了椎板成形术的形态学限制和 2 年随访结果。
结果:根据受试者工作特征曲线分析,OPLL 最大厚度>7.2mm 是减压不足的截断值。然而,充分或减压不足与 2 年 JOA 评分结果无关。C2-7 角对超声表现无影响。
结论:椎板成形术对厚 OPLL 有形态学限制,厚度>7.2mm 代表椎板成形术后脊髓残留受压的理论截断值。然而,根据 2 年的结果,椎板成形术仍然是任何类型的多节段 OPLL 的首选治疗方法。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011-2
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024-7-12