Department of Intensive Care, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, route de Lennik 808, 1070 Bruxelles, Belgium.
Crit Care. 2010;14(4):R126. doi: 10.1186/cc9091. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
Altered pharmacokinetics (PK) in critically ill patients can result in insufficient serum β-lactam concentrations when standard dosages are administered. Previous studies on β-lactam PK have generally excluded the most severely ill patients, or were conducted during the steady-state period of treatment. The aim of our study was to determine whether the first dose of piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, and meropenem would result in adequate serum drug concentrations in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.
Open, prospective, multicenter study in four Belgian intensive care units. All consecutive patients with a diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock, in whom treatment with the study drugs was indicated, were included. Serum concentrations of the antibiotics were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) before and 1, 1.5, 4.5 and 6 or 8 hours after administration.
80 patients were treated with piperacillin-tazobactam (n = 27), ceftazidime (n = 18), cefepime (n = 19) or meropenem (n = 16). Serum concentrations remained above 4 times the minimal inhibitory concentration (T > 4 × MIC), corresponding to the clinical breakpoint for Pseudomonas aeruginosa defined by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), for 57% of the dosage interval for meropenem (target MIC = 8 μg/mL), 45% for ceftazidime (MIC = 32 μg/mL), 34% for cefepime (MIC = 32 μg/mL), and 33% for piperacillin-tazobactam (MIC = 64 μg/mL). The number of patients who attained the target PK profile was 12/16 for meropenem (75%), 5/18 for ceftazidime (28%), 3/19 (16%) for cefepime, and 12/27 (44%) for piperacillin-tazobactam.
Serum concentrations of the antibiotic after the first dose were acceptable only for meropenem. Standard dosage regimens for piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime and cefepime may, therefore, be insufficient to empirically cover less susceptible pathogens in the early phase of severe sepsis and septic shock.
危重病患者的药代动力学(PK)改变可能导致给予标准剂量时血清β-内酰胺浓度不足。以前关于β-内酰胺 PK 的研究通常排除了病情最严重的患者,或者是在治疗的稳态期进行的。我们的研究目的是确定哌拉西林-他唑巴坦、头孢他啶、头孢吡肟和美罗培南的首剂量是否会使严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的血清药物浓度达到足够水平。
在比利时的四个重症监护病房进行的开放、前瞻性、多中心研究。所有符合严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克诊断、需要使用研究药物治疗的连续患者均纳入研究。通过高效液相色谱法(HPLC)在给药前及给药后 1、1.5、4.5 和 6 或 8 小时测定抗生素的血清浓度。
80 例患者接受了哌拉西林-他唑巴坦(n=27)、头孢他啶(n=18)、头孢吡肟(n=19)或美罗培南(n=16)治疗。对于美罗培南(目标 MIC=8μg/ml),57%的剂量间隔时间血清浓度保持在最低抑菌浓度(T>4×MIC)的 4 倍以上,这相当于欧洲抗菌药物敏感性试验委员会(EUCAST)定义的铜绿假单胞菌的临床折点;头孢他啶(MIC=32μg/ml)的 45%,头孢吡肟(MIC=32μg/ml)的 34%,哌拉西林-他唑巴坦(MIC=64μg/ml)的 33%。达到目标 PK 特征的患者数量为美罗培南 12/16(75%)、头孢他啶 5/18(28%)、头孢吡肟 3/19(16%)和哌拉西林-他唑巴坦 12/27(44%)。
首剂量后抗生素的血清浓度仅对美罗培南可接受。因此,哌拉西林-他唑巴坦、头孢他啶和头孢吡肟的标准剂量方案可能不足以在严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的早期阶段经验性覆盖敏感性较低的病原体。