Department of Pharmacy, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Nov 22;61(12). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01350-17. Print 2017 Dec.
Guidelines for the treatment of sepsis, febrile neutropenia, and hospital-acquired pneumonia caused by include empirical regimens incorporating two antibiotics from different classes with activity against for select at-risk patients to increase the likelihood that the organism will be susceptible to at least one agent. The activity against and the rates of cross-resistance of ceftolozane-tazobactam were compared to those of the β-lactam comparators cefepime, ceftazidime, piperacillin-tazobactam, and meropenem alone and cumulatively with ciprofloxacin or tobramycin. Nonurine isolates were collected from adult inpatients at 44 geographically diverse U.S. hospitals. MICs were determined using reference broth microdilution methods. Of the 1,257 isolates collected, 29% were from patients in intensive care units and 39% were from respiratory sites. The overall rate of susceptibility to ceftolozane-tazobactam was high at 97%, whereas it was 72 to 76% for cefepime, ceftazidime, piperacillin-tazobactam, and meropenem. The rate of nonsusceptibility to all four comparator β-lactams was 11%; of the isolates nonsusceptible to the four comparator β-lactams, 80% remained susceptible to ceftolozane-tazobactam. Among the isolates nonsusceptible to the tested β-lactam comparators, less than half were susceptible to ciprofloxacin. By comparison, approximately 80% of the β-lactam-nonsusceptible isolates were susceptible to tobramycin, for overall cumulative susceptibility rates of 94 to 95%, nearly 10% higher than that of the ciprofloxacin-β-lactam combinations and approaching that of ceftolozane-tazobactam as a single agent. The rates of susceptibility to ceftolozane-tazobactam were consistently high, with little observable cross-resistance. Ceftolozane-tazobactam monotherapy performed at or above the level of commonly utilized combination therapies on the basis of susceptibilities. Ceftolozane-tazobactam should be considered for use in patients at high risk for resistant infection and as an alternative to empirical combination therapy, especially for patients unable to tolerate aminoglycosides.
包括经验性治疗方案在内的治疗指南,纳入了针对 的两类不同作用机制的抗生素,以提高所选高危患者对至少一种药物敏感的可能性。与 β-内酰胺类药物比较剂头孢吡肟、头孢他啶、哌拉西林他唑巴坦和亚胺培南单独使用以及与环丙沙星或妥布霉素联合使用相比,头孢洛扎他唑巴坦对 的活性和交叉耐药率进行了比较。从美国 44 个地理位置不同的医院的成年住院患者中收集了非尿液 分离株。使用参考肉汤微量稀释法测定 MIC。在收集的 1257 株分离株中,29%来自重症监护病房患者,39%来自呼吸道部位。头孢洛扎他唑巴坦的总体敏感性率很高,为 97%,而头孢吡肟、头孢他啶、哌拉西林他唑巴坦和亚胺培南的敏感性率为 72%至 76%。对所有四种比较 β-内酰胺类药物均不敏感的分离株率为 11%;对四种比较 β-内酰胺类药物均不敏感的分离株中,80%对头孢洛扎他唑巴坦仍敏感。在对测试的β-内酰胺类比较剂不敏感的分离株中,不到一半对环丙沙星敏感。相比之下,大约 80%的β-内酰胺类药物不敏感分离株对妥布霉素敏感,总体累积敏感性率为 94%至 95%,比环丙沙星-β-内酰胺类联合用药略高,接近头孢洛扎他唑巴坦作为单一药物的水平。头孢洛扎他唑巴坦的敏感性率始终很高,几乎没有观察到交叉耐药性。基于 药敏结果,头孢洛扎他唑巴坦单药治疗与常用联合治疗方案相当。对于高风险耐 感染患者,应考虑使用头孢洛扎他唑巴坦,作为经验性联合治疗的替代方案,特别是对于不能耐受氨基糖苷类药物的患者。