University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Jul-Aug;17(4):396-402. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.000992.
Immunosuppressive therapy following transplantation, if not managed well, can lead to increased drug toxicity or rejection episodes. We investigated whether use of an automated clinical management system in our liver transplant program would improve clinical outcomes in managing transplant recipients' immunosuppressive medications.
We performed a retrospective cohort study of two patient groups receiving liver transplants at our institution. One group of 301 patients transplanted from January 1, 2004 to November 30, 2006 received outpatient immunosuppressive management using a paper charting system. After instituting an automated clinical management system, the following group of 127 patients transplanted from December 12, 2006 to April 1, 2008 received their outpatient immunosuppressive management with that system. Only patients who received tacrolimus therapy, with or without mycophenolate mofetil or prednisone, were studied.
Our endpoints included percentage of patients having rejection and/or tacrolimus toxicity episodes. Various recipient, intraoperative, donor, and postoperative variables, including managing the immunosuppressive therapy with a paper charting system or an automated management system, were studied to determine which factors were associated with our endpoints.
Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed the automated system was significantly associated with fewer rejection episodes and fewer tacrolimus toxicity events. Formal cost-effectiveness analysis of the nurses' salaries for 1 year showed the automated system cost US$197 per patient and the paper system cost US$1703 per patient. The automated system improved quality of life years.
Use of an automated clinical management system for outpatient immunosuppressive management for liver transplant patients has resulted in a decrease in both tacrolimus toxicity and rejection episodes and is cost-effective.
移植后免疫抑制治疗,如果管理不当,可能会导致药物毒性增加或排斥反应。我们研究了在我们的肝移植项目中使用自动化临床管理系统是否会改善管理移植受者免疫抑制药物的临床结果。
我们对在我们的机构接受肝移植的两组患者进行了回顾性队列研究。一组 301 名患者于 2004 年 1 月 1 日至 2006 年 11 月 30 日接受门诊免疫抑制管理,使用纸质图表系统。在实施自动化临床管理系统后,以下 127 名患者于 2006 年 12 月 12 日至 2008 年 4 月 1 日接受该系统的门诊免疫抑制管理。仅研究了接受他克莫司治疗的患者,无论是否使用霉酚酸酯或泼尼松。
我们的终点包括发生排斥反应和/或他克莫司毒性的患者比例。研究了各种受体、手术中、供体和术后变量,包括使用纸质图表系统或自动化管理系统管理免疫抑制治疗,以确定哪些因素与我们的终点相关。
多变量逻辑回归分析显示,自动化系统与较少的排斥反应和较少的他克莫司毒性事件显著相关。对护士 1 年工资的正式成本效益分析表明,自动化系统每位患者花费 197 美元,纸质系统每位患者花费 1703 美元。自动化系统提高了生活质量年数。
使用自动化临床管理系统对肝移植患者进行门诊免疫抑制管理可减少他克莫司毒性和排斥反应,并且具有成本效益。