Hideyuki Koga, Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, PO Box 4014 Ullevaal Stadion, 0806 Oslo, Norway.
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Nov;38(11):2218-25. doi: 10.1177/0363546510373570. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
The mechanism for noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury is still a matter of controversy. Video analysis of injury tapes is the only method available to extract biomechanical information from actual anterior cruciate ligament injury cases.
This article describes 3-dimensional knee joint kinematics in anterior cruciate ligament injury situations using a model-based image-matching technique.
Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
Ten anterior cruciate ligament injury video sequences from women's handball and basketball were analyzed using the model-based image-matching method.
The mean knee flexion angle among the 10 cases was 23° (range, 11°-30°) at initial contact (IC) and had increased by 24° (95% confidence interval [CI], 19°-29°) within the following 40 milliseconds. The mean valgus angle was neutral (range, -2° to 3°) at IC, but had increased by 12° (95% CI, 10°-13°) 40 milliseconds later. The knee was externally rotated 5° (range, -5° to 12°) at IC, but rotated internally by 8° (95% CI, 2°-14°) during the first 40 milliseconds, followed by external rotation of 17° (95% CI, 13°-22°). The mean peak vertical ground-reaction force was 3.2 times body weight (95% CI, 2.7-3.7), and occurred at 40 milliseconds after IC (range, 0-83).
Based on when the sudden changes in joint angular motion and the peak vertical ground-reaction force occurred, it is likely that the anterior cruciate ligament injury occurred approximately 40 milliseconds after IC. The kinematic patterns were surprisingly consistent among the 10 cases. All players had immediate valgus motion within 40 milliseconds after IC. Moreover, the tibia rotated internally during the first 40 milliseconds and then external rotation was observed, possibly after the anterior cruciate ligament had torn. These results suggest that valgus loading is a contributing factor in the anterior cruciate ligament injury mechanism and that internal tibial rotation is coupled with valgus motion. Prevention programs should focus on acquiring a good cutting and landing technique with knee flexion and without valgus loading of the knee.
非接触性前交叉韧带损伤的机制仍存在争议。对损伤录像的视频分析是从实际前交叉韧带损伤病例中提取生物力学信息的唯一方法。
本文使用基于模型的图像匹配技术描述前交叉韧带损伤情况下的三维膝关节运动学。
病例系列;证据水平,4 级。
使用基于模型的图像匹配方法分析了 10 例女子手球和篮球的前交叉韧带损伤视频序列。
10 例中平均膝关节屈曲角度在初始接触(IC)时为 23°(范围,11°-30°),在随后的 40 毫秒内增加了 24°(95%置信区间[CI],19°-29°)。在 IC 时平均外翻角度为中立位(范围,-2°至 3°),但 40 毫秒后增加了 12°(95%CI,10°-13°)。在 IC 时膝关节外旋 5°(范围,-5°至 12°),但在前 40 毫秒内内旋 8°(95%CI,2°-14°),随后外旋 17°(95%CI,13°-22°)。平均垂直地面反作用力峰值为 3.2 倍体重(95%CI,2.7-3.7),并在 IC 后 40 毫秒(范围,0-83)时发生。
根据关节角运动和垂直地面反作用力峰值突然变化的时间,前交叉韧带损伤可能发生在 IC 后约 40 毫秒。10 例的运动模式非常一致。所有运动员在 IC 后 40 毫秒内立即出现外翻运动。此外,胫骨在前 40 毫秒内先内旋,然后观察到外旋,可能在前交叉韧带撕裂后。这些结果表明,外翻负荷是前交叉韧带损伤机制的一个促成因素,并且胫骨内旋与外翻运动相关。预防计划应侧重于获得良好的切割和着陆技术,膝关节屈曲,无膝关节外翻负荷。