• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下颌角骨折微型钢板与拉力螺钉骨固定术的比较

Comparison of miniplate versus lag-screw osteosynthesis for fractures of the mandibular angle.

作者信息

Schaaf Heidrun, Kaubruegge Steffen, Streckbein Philipp, Wilbrand Jan-Falco, Kerkmann Heiko, Howaldt Hans-Peter

机构信息

Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg GmbH, Giessen, Germany.

出版信息

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Jan;111(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.03.043. Epub 2010 Jul 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.03.043
PMID:20598593
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Treating mandibular angle fractures is common in maxillofacial surgery. The aim of this study was to compare lag screw fixation and miniplates.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective investigation compared patients treated with miniplates (n = 24) and with lag screws (n = 21). Inclusion criteria were a solitary angle fracture without comminution or other reasons for load-bearing osteosynthesis. The main parameters for the outcome analysis were fracture gaps at 4 defined measuring points on postoperative radiography. Postsurgical complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Fracture gaps measured in panoramic radiographs differed significantly between the lag-screw (average 0.56 mm) group and the group using 1 miniplate (average 0.85 mm) and 2 miniplates (1.40 mm). Miniplate fixation resulted in a wider fracture gap, especially in the region of the lower margin of the mandible.

CONCLUSION

Lag-screw fixation demonstrated smaller fracture gaps compared with miniplate fixation.

摘要

目的

治疗下颌角骨折在颌面外科中很常见。本研究的目的是比较拉力螺钉固定和微型钢板。

研究设计

这项回顾性研究比较了接受微型钢板治疗的患者(n = 24)和接受拉力螺钉治疗的患者(n = 21)。纳入标准为孤立性角部骨折,无粉碎或其他进行承重骨固定的原因。结果分析的主要参数是术后X光片上4个定义测量点的骨折间隙。记录术后并发症。

结果

全景X光片中测量的骨折间隙在拉力螺钉组(平均0.56毫米)与使用1块微型钢板的组(平均0.85毫米)和2块微型钢板的组(1.40毫米)之间有显著差异。微型钢板固定导致骨折间隙更宽,尤其是在下颌骨下缘区域。

结论

与微型钢板固定相比,拉力螺钉固定显示出更小的骨折间隙。

相似文献

1
Comparison of miniplate versus lag-screw osteosynthesis for fractures of the mandibular angle.下颌角骨折微型钢板与拉力螺钉骨固定术的比较
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Jan;111(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.03.043. Epub 2010 Jul 2.
2
[Comparison of miniplate and lag screw osteosynthesis in treatment of collum fractures].微型钢板与拉力螺钉内固定治疗股骨颈骨折的比较
Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir. 1996;41:131-3.
3
A comparative study between traditional fixation with miniplates and modified lag screws for the treatment of mandibular fractures.传统的微型钢板固定与改良的拉力螺钉治疗下颌骨骨折的对比研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Apr;22(3):1503-1511. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2243-7. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
4
[Experiences and results in management of mandibular fractures with the modified Krenkel lag screw--a retrospective study].[改良克伦克尔拉力螺钉治疗下颌骨骨折的经验与结果——一项回顾性研究]
Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir. 1996;41:96-9.
5
[Is miniplate osteosynthesis for combined mandibular body and bilateral mandibular condyle fractures adequate?].[小型接骨板骨合成术治疗下颌骨体部联合双侧下颌髁突骨折是否足够?]
Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir. 1996;41:61-3.
6
Transverse displacement of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal osteotomy: a comparison of lag screw fixation versus miniplates with monocortical screw technique.双侧矢状截骨术后近端节段的横向移位:拉力螺钉固定与单皮质螺钉技术微型钢板固定的比较
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Jan;66(1):104-11. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.06.275.
7
A comparative evaluation of osteosynthesis with lag screws, miniplates, or Kirschner wires for mandibular condylar process fractures.下颌髁突骨折采用拉力螺钉、微型钢板或克氏针进行骨内固定的比较评估。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001 Oct;59(10):1161-8; discussion 1169-70. doi: 10.1053/joms.2001.26718.
8
"A comparative evaluation between single noncompression titanium miniplate and three dimensional titanium miniplate in treatment of mandibular angle fracture"--a randomized prospective study.“单皮质非压缩钛小型接骨板与三维钛小型接骨板治疗下颌角骨折的对比评价”——一项随机前瞻性研究。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013 Mar;41(2):103-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.05.015. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
9
Management of mandibular angle fractures using the mandibular angle reduction forceps.使用下颌角复位钳治疗下颌角骨折
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 May;34(3):257-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2004.05.009.
10
Can an arch bar replace a second lag screw in management of anterior mandibular fractures?在治疗下颌前部骨折时,牙弓夹板能否替代第二枚拉力螺钉?
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Feb;70(2):378-83. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.08.010. Epub 2011 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of lag screws and miniplates in the fixation of anterior mandibular fractures- a prospective study.下颌前部骨折固定中拉力螺钉与微型钢板的比较评估——一项前瞻性研究。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025 May 28;29(1):112. doi: 10.1007/s10006-025-01406-7.
2
Comparative evaluation of different osteosynthesis modalities with respect to lingual splaying in mandibular interforaminal fractures using CBCT: A prospective study.使用CBCT对下颌孔间骨折舌侧张开情况下不同接骨方式的比较评估:一项前瞻性研究。
Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Jan-Apr;15(1):100-105. doi: 10.4103/njms.njms_5_23. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
3
Masticatory muscles activity in patients with mandibular angle fractures: A literature review on which procedure to use to reverse the best masticatory muscles functionality.
下颌角骨折患者咀嚼肌的活动:关于采用何种手术恢复最佳咀嚼肌功能的文献综述
Heliyon. 2023 Mar 31;9(4):e15024. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15024. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
Comparative Evaluation of Conventional Miniplates, Three-Dimensional Miniplates and Lag Screws for Internal Fixation of Parasymphysis Fracture of Mandible-A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Study.传统微型钢板、三维微型钢板及拉力螺钉用于下颌骨髁突骨折内固定的比较评价——一项双盲随机临床研究
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2022 Mar;21(1):283-289. doi: 10.1007/s12663-021-01647-5. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
5
Comparison of lag screws and double Y-shaped miniplates in the fixation of anterior mandibular fractures.拉力螺钉与双Y形微型钢板在下颌前部骨折固定中的比较。
World J Methodol. 2021 May 20;11(3):88-94. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v11.i3.88.
6
Management of Sub-Condylar and Angle of Mandible Fracture by a Trans-Buccal Trocar Along With an Intra-Oral Approach.经颊穿刺套管针联合口内入路治疗髁突下及下颌角骨折
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Dec;72(4):538-544. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-02058-7. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
7
Three-dimensional versus standard miniplate, lag screws versus miniplates, locking plate versus non-locking miniplates: Management of mandibular fractures, a systematic review and meta-analysis.三维接骨板与标准微型接骨板、拉力螺钉与微型接骨板、锁定接骨板与非锁定微型接骨板:下颌骨骨折的治疗,一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Dent Sci. 2019 Mar;14(1):66-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2018.04.004. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
8
A comparative study between traditional fixation with miniplates and modified lag screws for the treatment of mandibular fractures.传统的微型钢板固定与改良的拉力螺钉治疗下颌骨骨折的对比研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Apr;22(3):1503-1511. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2243-7. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
9
A Clinical Study of Mandibular Angle Fracture.下颌角骨折的临床研究
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Sep;36(5):201-6. doi: 10.14402/jkamprs.2014.36.5.201. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
10
Evaluation of in vitro resistance of different 2.0-mm titanium plates on the mandibular angle sectioning.不同2.0毫米钛板在下颌角截骨处的体外抗阻评估。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Mar;19(1):65-70. doi: 10.1007/s10006-014-0456-3.