University of Colorado Denver, School of Medicine, Department of Physical Therapy, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Jul;91(7):1128-36. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.04.009.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the reliability and validity of 2 commonly used measures of pain related fear in patients with shoulder pain. DESIGN: A preplanned secondary analysis of a prospective single-arm trial involving a repeated-measures design. SETTING: Outpatient physical therapy clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=80) with a primary report of shoulder pain. INTERVENTION: All patients completed the outcome measures at baseline and at follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients completed a modified Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), the 11-item version of Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-11), and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) at baseline and at a 48-hour follow-up. Patients were dichotomized as improved or stable at follow-up based on the Global Rating of Change. RESULTS: Factor analysis indicated 3 stable factors for the FABQ and 1 stable factor for the TSK-11. Shoulder specific scoring for the FABQ and TSK-11 were used in subsequent analyses. Test-retest reliability intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was substantial for the FABQ and the TSK-11. The FABQ correlated significantly with SPADI pain and disability scores, while the TSK-11 correlated significantly only with SPADI pain scores. The shoulder-specific FABQ-W (work beliefs subscale) was a better than chance predictor of missing days of work during the 48-hour study period. CONCLUSIONS: The modified FABQ and TSK-11 may be appropriate for use in patients with shoulder pain. Shoulder-specific scoring of these measures resulted in substantial test-retest reliability, and the FABQ correlated with the SPADI for pain and disability. The FABQ also showed potential for prediction of short-term work loss in this sample. Pain-related fear may be an important variable in patients with shoulder pain and merits future consideration in longitudinal studies.
目的:研究两种常用于肩部疼痛患者的疼痛相关恐惧测量方法的信度和效度。
设计:对一项前瞻性单臂试验的预先计划的二次分析,采用重复测量设计。
设置:门诊物理治疗诊所。
参与者:肩部疼痛的主要报告患者(N=80)。
干预:所有患者在基线和随访时完成了测量。
主要观察指标:患者在基线和 48 小时随访时完成了改良恐惧回避信念问卷(FABQ)、11 项坦帕运动恐惧量表(TSK-11)和肩部疼痛和残疾指数(SPADI)。根据总体变化评分,患者在随访时分为改善或稳定。
结果:因子分析表明 FABQ 有 3 个稳定因子,TSK-11 有 1 个稳定因子。在后续分析中使用了 FABQ 和 TSK-11 的肩部特定评分。FABQ 和 TSK-11 的测试-重测信度组内相关系数(ICC)均较高。FABQ 与 SPADI 疼痛和残疾评分显著相关,而 TSK-11 仅与 SPADI 疼痛评分显著相关。FABQ 中的肩部特异性 FABQ-W(工作信念子量表)在 48 小时研究期间预测缺勤天数的能力优于机会。
结论:改良 FABQ 和 TSK-11 可能适用于肩部疼痛患者。这些措施的肩部特异性评分具有较高的测试-重测信度,FABQ 与 SPADI 的疼痛和残疾评分相关。FABQ 还显示出在该样本中预测短期工作损失的潜力。疼痛相关恐惧可能是肩部疼痛患者的一个重要变量,值得在未来的纵向研究中进一步考虑。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008-8-1
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010-4
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010-10-22
Open Access J Sports Med. 2024-11-30