Cavaggion Claudia, Luque-Suarez Alejandro, Voogt Lennard, Juul-Kristensen Birgit, Wollants Guy, Beke Lucas, Fransen Erik, Struyf Filip
Research Group MOVANT, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Malaga, Malaga, Spain.
Open Access J Sports Med. 2024 Nov 30;15:181-196. doi: 10.2147/OAJSM.S483272. eCollection 2024.
Exercise therapy is the first-line treatment in rotator cuff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP), and diverse types of exercise seem effective. However, it is not still clear if painful exercise should be allowed or avoided during exercises. The objective of this study was to investigate if exercise into pain is more effective than no pain in RCRSP.
A randomized controlled trial was conducted in a physiotherapy clinic in Belgium. Forty-three participants with chronic RCRSP were randomly allocated to G1 (exercising into pain) or G2 (exercising without pain) in a 12-week intervention with 6-month follow-up. Primary outcome was the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI); secondary outcomes were pain intensity, fear-avoidance beliefs, fear of pain, quality of life, strength, and range of motion. Outcomes were measured at baseline (T0), after 9 weeks (T1), 12 weeks (T2), and 6 months (T3) from the first session and analysed with linear mixed models.
No between-group difference in SPADI (time-by-group interaction, p = 0.25) up to 6 months was found, with mean difference (G1-G2) at T1 = 5.78 (CI95%: -3.43,14.59; p = 0.33), at T2 = 0.93 (CI95%: -7.20,9.05; p = 0.82), at T3 = 4.15 (CI95%: -2.61,10.92; p = 0.33). No between-group differences were found for any other outcomes.
Pain provocation seems not to be necessary in RCRSP for achieving successful treatment effect in pain and disability reduction, fear-related beliefs, and quality of life up to 6 months.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04553289.
运动疗法是肩袖相关肩部疼痛(RCRSP)的一线治疗方法,多种类型的运动似乎都有效。然而,在运动过程中是否应允许或避免进行引起疼痛的运动仍不明确。本研究的目的是调查在RCRSP中,进行引起疼痛的运动是否比不引起疼痛的运动更有效。
在比利时的一家物理治疗诊所进行了一项随机对照试验。43名慢性RCRSP患者在为期12周的干预及6个月的随访中被随机分配到G1组(进行引起疼痛的运动)或G2组(进行不引起疼痛的运动)。主要结局指标是肩部疼痛和功能障碍指数(SPADI);次要结局指标包括疼痛强度、恐惧回避信念、疼痛恐惧、生活质量、力量和关节活动范围。在第一次治疗后的基线(T0)、9周(T1)、12周(T2)和6个月(T3)测量结局指标,并采用线性混合模型进行分析。
在长达6个月的时间里,未发现两组间SPADI存在差异(时间×组间交互作用,p = 0.25),T1时的平均差异(G1 - G2)为5.78(95%CI:-3.43,14.59;p = 0.33),T2时为0.93(95%CI:-7.20,9.05;p = 0.82),T3时为4.15(95%CI:-2.61,10.92;p = 0.33)。在其他任何结局指标上均未发现两组间存在差异。
在RCRSP中,对于在长达6个月的时间里减轻疼痛和功能障碍、改善恐惧相关信念及生活质量而言,引发疼痛似乎并非成功治疗所必需。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04553289。