Suppr超能文献

床旁超声可安全消除中心静脉置管后胸部 X 线的需求:外科重症监护病房(SICU)中的 CVC 超声。

Bedside ultrasound can safely eliminate the need for chest radiographs after central venous catheter placement: CVC sono in the surgical ICU (SICU).

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Acute Care, and Critical Care Surgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033-850, USA.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2010 Sep;163(1):155-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.04.020. Epub 2010 May 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Real-time ultrasound guidance of central venous catheter (CVC)/peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) insertion improves safety and efficacy. We hypothesized that a more robust ultrasound surveillance technique incorporating thoracic, vascular, and cardiac views-the CVC sono-would avoid the need for chest radiography to realize cost and efficiency gains.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective data collection in a high-volume, urban, academic SICU. A single surgical intensivist, blinded to the results of chest radiography, performed all CVC sonos post-insertion. Catheter malposition was defined as location extrinsic to the superior vena cava and determined by a board-certified radiologist on chest radiography. CVC sono consisted of (1) mechanical complications screen (hemo-, pneumothorax), (2) intravenous tip screen, (3) intracardiac tip screen. The result of CVC sono was compared with chest radiography.

RESULTS

CVC sono evaluated 83 catheters (42 CVCs and 41 PICCs) and was considered technically adequate in 59 (71%). Incomplete studies were significantly more common in those with chest tubes (P = 0.02), but not in those with cervical collars (P = 0.07), an open abdomen (P = 0.28), or BMI > 40 (P = 0.33). Mean CVC sono time was 10.8 min, compared with chest radiography of 75.3 min (P < 0.001). No hemo-pneumothoraces developed. Presence of multiple indwelling central catheters (>1 CVC) trended for inaccurate CVC sono for catheter malposition (accuracy: 79% versus 93%, P = 0.11).

CONCLUSION

A novel ultrasound technique, CVC sono eliminated the need for chest radiography in most patients after CVC/PICC insertion, saving time and money. Those with multiple indwelling central catheters may still require post-insertion conventional chest radiography.

摘要

背景

实时超声引导中心静脉导管(CVC)/外周置入中心静脉导管(PICC)置管可提高安全性和有效性。我们假设,一种更强大的超声监测技术,包括胸部、血管和心脏视图- CVC 超声,可以避免因实现成本和效率效益而需要进行胸部 X 线摄影。

方法

我们在一个大容量、城市、学术性重症监护室(SICU)进行了前瞻性数据收集。一名单独的外科重症医师在进行 CVC 超声检查时,对所有患者进行盲法操作,不参考胸部 X 线摄影结果。导管位置异常定义为位于上腔静脉外的位置,并由一名经过委员会认证的放射科医生通过胸部 X 线摄影来确定。CVC 超声包括(1)机械并发症筛查(血胸、气胸),(2)静脉尖端筛查,(3)心内尖端筛查。将 CVC 超声的结果与胸部 X 线摄影进行比较。

结果

CVC 超声评估了 83 根导管(42 根 CVC 和 41 根 PICC),其中 59 根(71%)被认为技术上是充分的。在那些有胸腔引流管的患者中,不完整的研究明显更常见(P = 0.02),但在那些有颈托(P = 0.07)、开放腹部(P = 0.28)或 BMI > 40 的患者中(P = 0.33),不完整的研究并不常见。CVC 超声的平均时间为 10.8 分钟,而胸部 X 线摄影的时间为 75.3 分钟(P < 0.001)。没有发生血胸和气胸。在存在多个留置中心导管(>1 根 CVC)的患者中,CVC 超声对导管位置异常的准确性趋势为不准确(准确性:79%对 93%,P = 0.11)。

结论

一种新的超声技术,CVC 超声在大多数 CVC/PICC 置管后患者中消除了对胸部 X 线摄影的需求,节省了时间和金钱。那些有多个留置中心导管的患者可能仍需要进行置管后的常规胸部 X 线摄影。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验